Does anyone really care...?

 

On 7/7/2010 5:22 AM, DanS wrote:

 

> Frank wrote in news:4c33c738@news.x-privat.org:

 

>

 

>> On 7/6/2010 5:11 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>> news:4c33c123$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 7/6/2010 2:59 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>> news:4c338d66$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 1:00 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>> news:4c337e6c$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 8:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> service-->

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Maybe 3-5 people in here care about your

 

>>>>>>>> opinion...maybe!

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Like I said....

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Lee than that care about your opinion.

 

>>>

 

>> Obviously you do!...LOL!

 

>>

 

>

 

WoW little boy. Do I push all of your buttons, or what?...LOL!

alias is caught lying...again...as usual.

 

On 7/7/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 1:56 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>> station or

 

>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>> money on

 

>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>> than

 

>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>

 

>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>> communication.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>

 

>>> I can cite just as many governments that use Linux and, like your

 

>>> examples, besides the point of my post. Facebook, Twitter, Email, IM,

 

>>> WWW, etc. work just fine in Linux and much safer for the home user.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> You seem to skate right over the points I raised. Not that Linux won't

 

>> work, but that there times when only Windows will work.

 

>

 

> See my other reply.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> Of course, that little bit of logic seems to be something that your

 

>> one world operating system doesn't seem to accommodate well.

 

>

 

> I advocate using both. Got any more erroneous guesses as to what I think?

 

>

 

>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me, why is it

 

>> that I have never had, with but one exception, and that from a pirated

 

>> disk copy, had a virus or other form of mal ware that effected the

 

>> operation of my computer in all the years I've been using one, and I

 

>> do back to the Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user

 

>> of community machines.

 

>>

 

>> Is this because I am such a super man, or is it that perhaps, with

 

>> even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is not the demon that you

 

>> portray it as.

 

>>

 

>> Cheers,

 

>>

 

>> John D. Slocomb

 

>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>

 

> You are a geek. You know how to secure Windows. Most people don't which

 

> is why 3 out of 5 Windows computers are infected and hundreds of

 

> thousands of Windows computers are in bot nets bringing you spam and

 

> malware straight to your in-box.

 

>

 

That is the one of the biggest GD lies you keep telling, yet when

 

cornered and asked to provide the verifiable, empirical data, that you

 

base that statement on, you disappear and provide nothing in the form of

 

proof.

 

You are a LIAR, LIAR and we all know it.

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 4:37 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>

 

>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>> configurable.

 

>>>

 

>>> Work Stations

 

>>>

 

>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

>>> a third part program.

 

>>>

 

>>> File search

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>

 

>>> File transfer

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>

 

>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>

 

>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>

 

>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>

 

>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>

 

>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>

 

>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>

 

>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>

 

>>> Cost:

 

>>>

 

>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>

 

>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>> run Windows".

 

>

 

> So what?

 

>

 

>>

 

>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>> communication.

 

>

 

> If I sent them an Open Office .doc, they wouldn't know the difference.

 

 

 

Proof that you've never really been in any real business environment.

 

>>

 

>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>

 

> If you were to send them an Open Office doc, they wouldn't know the

 

> difference.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>

 

> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did you miss that

 

> or were you too busy nit picking?

 

 

 

That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly express your

 

hatred for all things MS.

 

You're not fooling anyone...other than yourself. You've had 7 for just a

 

few weeks now and are still a lying linturd loser.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>

 

> Most home users and most business users would not need Auto Cad nor

 

> would they need complicated Word docs.

 

 

 

That is an opinion of yours and cannot be proven by any verifiable,

 

empirical data.

 

Oops!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>> Linux.

 

>

 

> I can cite governments that use Linux but they're not in the third

 

> world. Germany, Spain and France come to mind.

 

 

 

No, you're wrong. Only some certain, small, agencies of those

 

governments use linux, not the entire governments of those Countries.

 

Oops!

 

>

 

>>

 

>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Cheers,

 

>>

 

>> John D. Slocomb

 

>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>

 

> Linux is better for some things and Windows is better for others.

 

 

 

Not really. That is only your opinion. Windows 7 is all anyone needs to

 

use to do everything possible on a computer.

 

 

 

Stop

 

> being such a nit picking twit who's cruisin' for a bruisin'.

 

 

 

"cruisin' for a bruisin'...is that your new mantra? Are you now

 

threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool out of you...or

 

you make a fool out of yourself and we all let you know it?

 

Oops!

alias is "outed"...again!...LOL!

 

On 7/7/2010 5:26 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 3:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 07/07/2010 02:12 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 7/6/2010 5:06 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 2:01 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>> On 7/6/2010 4:31 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 7/7/2010 12:17 AM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>> news:i0vnkt$sq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 6:57 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> The difference between Windows 7 and Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 costs money.

 

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu is FREE.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Have you always had such a simpleton mind?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> People still choose Windows 7.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I have both. No need to choose.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Argument over. Oops.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> What argument?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> The argument you started with your idiotic post you dumb shit.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> No wonder you use Ubuntu, you are STUPID.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Some people can carry on a civilized conversation.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Certainly, you are not, nor have you ever been one of those who

 

>>>>> carries

 

>>>>> on a "civilized conversation".

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Others, like you, are

 

>>>>>> just looking for a fight.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>> Today, you posted your "differences & similarities" post that was an

 

>>>>> uncalled for, OT personal opinion, and you were obviously looking

 

>>>>> for a

 

>>>>> fight.

 

>>>>> This is a Windows 7 ng, not a comparison ng for comparing Windows vs

 

>>>>> any

 

>>>>> other OS.

 

>>>>> We all realize you've only had Windows 7 Home Premium for a few weeks

 

>>>>> now and are just now learning how to use it, which is very obvious,

 

>>>>> and

 

>>>>> you've been pushing that POS useless toy os,

 

>>>>> up-yr-fucking-butt-too, in

 

>>>>> Windows ng's for yrs, (to no avail, as no one in their right mind

 

>>>>> would

 

>>>>> use that crap), and you continue to post about it and you are

 

>>>>> obviously

 

>>>>> looking for a fight, not a civilized conversation, so stop LYING!

 

>>>>> Oops!

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You got it all wrong again, Frank, but your useless ego won't let you

 

>>>> realize it.

 

>>>>

 

>>> And you think you're fooling who...here is a clue....you're only fooling

 

>>> yourself!...LOL!

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> Problem with that is that I'm not trying to fool anyone.

 

>

 

> Whether or not you're trying is unimportant.

 

> Fact is, you are not fooling anyone.

 

> Got it?

 

 

 

Get what that you don't get it? Yes I get that and have for years.

 

 

>

 

> You're the one

 

>> cruisin' for a bruisin', not me.

 

>

 

> Cornered you again huh?

 

 

 

You wish.

 

 

> That was easy!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

The only thing easy for you to do is to pimp out your mother, wife and

 

daughter

 

so you can stay home and post lies, profanity, drivel and bluster on

 

Usenet all day long.

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 5:30 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 3:51 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 07/07/2010 06:56 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 7/6/2010 7:50 PM, Parko wrote:

 

>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to satisfy

 

>>>> Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find something to pacify

 

>>>> Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>

 

>>> Don't worry knobber, kicking your lamer ass all day long is quite fun

 

>>> and requires very little effort!

 

>>> Oops!...LOL!

 

>>

 

>> Especially when you think you declaring yourself the "winner" is valid.

 

>

 

> Does that get your panties all in a bunch, sheep-fucker?

 

 

 

No, why should it?

 

 

> Too bad loser.

 

 

 

You're the pathetic loser who feels he has to declare himself a winner

 

here, not me, sport.

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 5:29 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>> Parko wrote in

 

>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>

 

>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>

 

>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>

 

>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to inane

 

>> perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an 'argument'.....

 

>>

 

>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you can.

 

>>

 

>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just like

 

>> Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>

 

>>

 

> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing about it,

 

> except yip!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

You don't even own your own mind, much less someone anyone that posts here.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is caught lying...again...as usual.

 

On 7/7/2010 5:35 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 1:56 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I can cite just as many governments that use Linux and, like your

 

>>>> examples, besides the point of my post. Facebook, Twitter, Email, IM,

 

>>>> WWW, etc. work just fine in Linux and much safer for the home user.

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> You seem to skate right over the points I raised. Not that Linux won't

 

>>> work, but that there times when only Windows will work.

 

>>

 

>> See my other reply.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Of course, that little bit of logic seems to be something that your

 

>>> one world operating system doesn't seem to accommodate well.

 

>>

 

>> I advocate using both. Got any more erroneous guesses as to what I think?

 

>>

 

>>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me, why is it

 

>>> that I have never had, with but one exception, and that from a pirated

 

>>> disk copy, had a virus or other form of mal ware that effected the

 

>>> operation of my computer in all the years I've been using one, and I

 

>>> do back to the Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user

 

>>> of community machines.

 

>>>

 

>>> Is this because I am such a super man, or is it that perhaps, with

 

>>> even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is not the demon that you

 

>>> portray it as.

 

>>>

 

>>> Cheers,

 

>>>

 

>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>

 

>> You are a geek. You know how to secure Windows. Most people don't which

 

>> is why 3 out of 5 Windows computers are infected and hundreds of

 

>> thousands of Windows computers are in bot nets bringing you spam and

 

>> malware straight to your in-box.

 

>>

 

> That is the one of the biggest GD lies you keep telling, yet when

 

> cornered and asked to provide the verifiable, empirical data, that you

 

> base that statement on, you disappear and provide nothing in the form of

 

> proof.

 

> You are a LIAR, LIAR and we all know it.

 

 

 

To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how."

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 5:46 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 4:37 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work station or

 

>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend money on

 

>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> File search

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more than

 

>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is nothing.

 

>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>> run Windows".

 

>>

 

>> So what?

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>> communication.

 

>>

 

>> If I sent them an Open Office .doc, they wouldn't know the difference.

 

>

 

> Proof that you've never really been in any real business environment.

 

 

 

Um, no it isn't. I do business with companies all over the world and

 

when I send them an Open Office document, they have no problem opening

 

it with Office or Word Perfect for that matter.

 

 

>>>

 

>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>

 

>> If you were to send them an Open Office doc, they wouldn't know the

 

>> difference.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>

 

>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did you miss that

 

>> or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>

 

> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly express your

 

> hatred for all things MS.

 

 

 

You wish.

 

 

> You're not fooling anyone...other than yourself. You've had 7 for just a

 

> few weeks now and are still a lying linturd loser.

 

 

 

I used to use XP and Ubuntu. Each has its own good points and bad

 

points. Only sick perverts like you have an emotional attachment to an

 

operating system or a software company.

 

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>

 

>> Most home users and most business users would not need Auto Cad nor

 

>> would they need complicated Word docs.

 

>

 

> That is an opinion of yours and cannot be proven by any verifiable,

 

> empirical data.

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how".

 

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>>> Linux.

 

>>

 

>> I can cite governments that use Linux but they're not in the third

 

>> world. Germany, Spain and France come to mind.

 

>

 

> No, you're wrong. Only some certain, small, agencies of those

 

> governments use linux, not the entire governments of those Countries.

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Cheers,

 

>>>

 

>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>

 

>> Linux is better for some things and Windows is better for others.

 

>

 

> Not really. That is only your opinion. Windows 7 is all anyone needs to

 

> use to do everything possible on a computer.

 

>

 

> Stop

 

>> being such a nit picking twit who's cruisin' for a bruisin'.

 

>

 

> "cruisin' for a bruisin'...is that your new mantra?

 

 

 

No, it's yours.

 

 

> Are you now

 

> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool out of you...or

 

> you make a fool out of yourself and we all let you know it?

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

That would be your M.O. You've threatened at least three people here and

 

on Vista General. Course, you weaseled out every time you were called on it.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is "outed"...again!...LOL!

 

On 7/7/2010 8:52 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:26 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 3:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 07/07/2010 02:12 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/6/2010 5:06 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 7/7/2010 2:01 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 4:31 PM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On 7/7/2010 12:17 AM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:i0vnkt$sq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 6:57 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> The difference between Windows 7 and Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 costs money.

 

>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu is FREE.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Have you always had such a simpleton mind?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> People still choose Windows 7.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> I have both. No need to choose.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Argument over. Oops.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> What argument?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> The argument you started with your idiotic post you dumb shit.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> No wonder you use Ubuntu, you are STUPID.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Some people can carry on a civilized conversation.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Certainly, you are not, nor have you ever been one of those who

 

>>>>>> carries

 

>>>>>> on a "civilized conversation".

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Others, like you, are

 

>>>>>>> just looking for a fight.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Today, you posted your "differences & similarities" post that was an

 

>>>>>> uncalled for, OT personal opinion, and you were obviously looking

 

>>>>>> for a

 

>>>>>> fight.

 

>>>>>> This is a Windows 7 ng, not a comparison ng for comparing Windows vs

 

>>>>>> any

 

>>>>>> other OS.

 

>>>>>> We all realize you've only had Windows 7 Home Premium for a few weeks

 

>>>>>> now and are just now learning how to use it, which is very obvious,

 

>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>> you've been pushing that POS useless toy os,

 

>>>>>> up-yr-fucking-butt-too, in

 

>>>>>> Windows ng's for yrs, (to no avail, as no one in their right mind

 

>>>>>> would

 

>>>>>> use that crap), and you continue to post about it and you are

 

>>>>>> obviously

 

>>>>>> looking for a fight, not a civilized conversation, so stop LYING!

 

>>>>>> Oops!

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You got it all wrong again, Frank, but your useless ego won't let you

 

>>>>> realize it.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> And you think you're fooling who...here is a clue....you're only

 

>>>> fooling

 

>>>> yourself!...LOL!

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> Problem with that is that I'm not trying to fool anyone.

 

>>

 

>> Whether or not you're trying is unimportant.

 

>> Fact is, you are not fooling anyone.

 

>> Got it?

 

>

 

> Get what that you don't get it?

 

 

 

Nice try LIAR! We get it that you don't get it.

 

 

 

Yes I get that and have for years.

 

 

 

No, you don't get anything...except your lamer ass licked by me and

 

everyone else in here.

 

>

 

 

>>

 

>> You're the one

 

>>> cruisin' for a bruisin', not me.

 

>>

 

>> Cornered you again huh?

 

>

 

> You wish.

 

 

 

Keep dancing, although there is not a lot of room in the corner I've put

 

you in.

 

>

 

>> That was easy!

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> The only thing easy for you to do is to pimp out your mother, wife and

 

> daughter...

 

 

 

hehehe...WoW!...Cornered your lamer ass again...so you need to cross the

 

line. You're a weak little piece of useless shit aren't you.

 

Pathetic best describes you.

 

 

> so you can stay home and post lies, profanity, drivel and bluster on

 

> Usenet all day long.

 

 

 

Now you are projecting...again...as usual.

 

Get life cock sucker.

 

>

 

>

alias is "outed"...again!...LOL!

 

On 7/7/2010 6:01 PM, Frank wrote:

 

 

> No, you don't get anything...except your lamer ass licked by me

 

 

 

Yuck. How long have you been licking asses, sport?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is "outed"...again!...LOL!

 

On 7/7/2010 9:05 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 6:01 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>

 

>> No, you don't get anything...except your lamer ass licked by me

 

>

 

> Yuck. How long have you been licking asses, sport?

 

>

 

How long have you been fucking sheep?

 

That long?

 

WoW!

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 8:53 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:30 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 3:51 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 07/07/2010 06:56 AM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/6/2010 7:50 PM, Parko wrote:

 

>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to satisfy

 

>>>>> Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find something to pacify

 

>>>>> Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Don't worry knobber, kicking your lamer ass all day long is quite fun

 

>>>> and requires very little effort!

 

>>>> Oops!...LOL!

 

>>>

 

>>> Especially when you think you declaring yourself the "winner" is valid.

 

>>

 

>> Does that get your panties all in a bunch, sheep-fucker?

 

>

 

> No, why should it?

 

 

 

You're the one with your panties all in a bunch, so you tell us.

 

>

 

>> Too bad loser.

 

>

 

> You're the pathetic loser who feels he has to declare himself a winner

 

> here, not me, sport.

 

 

 

You are the lying loser, *SPORT*!

 

>

 

>

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 8:54 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:29 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> Parko wrote in

 

>>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to inane

 

>>> perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an 'argument'.....

 

>>>

 

>>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you can.

 

>>>

 

>>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just like

 

>>> Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

>> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing about it,

 

>> except yip!

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> You don't even own your own mind, much less someone anyone that posts here.

 

>

 

Another response form one of my Pavlovian dogs...that I own.

 

oops!

alias is caught lying...again...as usual.

 

On 7/7/2010 8:56 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:35 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 1:56 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes

 

>>>>>>> with XP

 

>>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the

 

>>>>>> benefits of

 

>>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are

 

>>>>>> laughing

 

>>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I can cite just as many governments that use Linux and, like your

 

>>>>> examples, besides the point of my post. Facebook, Twitter, Email, IM,

 

>>>>> WWW, etc. work just fine in Linux and much safer for the home user.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You seem to skate right over the points I raised. Not that Linux won't

 

>>>> work, but that there times when only Windows will work.

 

>>>

 

>>> See my other reply.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Of course, that little bit of logic seems to be something that your

 

>>>> one world operating system doesn't seem to accommodate well.

 

>>>

 

>>> I advocate using both. Got any more erroneous guesses as to what I

 

>>> think?

 

>>>

 

>>>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me, why is it

 

>>>> that I have never had, with but one exception, and that from a pirated

 

>>>> disk copy, had a virus or other form of mal ware that effected the

 

>>>> operation of my computer in all the years I've been using one, and I

 

>>>> do back to the Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user

 

>>>> of community machines.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Is this because I am such a super man, or is it that perhaps, with

 

>>>> even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is not the demon that you

 

>>>> portray it as.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>

 

>>> You are a geek. You know how to secure Windows. Most people don't which

 

>>> is why 3 out of 5 Windows computers are infected and hundreds of

 

>>> thousands of Windows computers are in bot nets bringing you spam and

 

>>> malware straight to your in-box.

 

>>>

 

>> That is the one of the biggest GD lies you keep telling, yet when

 

>> cornered and asked to provide the verifiable, empirical data, that you

 

>> base that statement on, you disappear and provide nothing in the form of

 

>> proof.

 

>> You are a LIAR, LIAR and we all know it.

 

>

 

> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how."

 

>

 

I did...and it proves that you are a LIAR, LIAR!

 

Oops!

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 9:01 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:46 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 4:37 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>> station or

 

>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>> money on

 

>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are pretty

 

>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>> than

 

>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>

 

>>> So what?

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>> communication.

 

>>>

 

>>> If I sent them an Open Office .doc, they wouldn't know the difference.

 

>>

 

>> Proof that you've never really been in any real business environment.

 

>

 

> Um, no it isn't. I do business with companies all over the world and

 

> when I send them an Open Office document, they have no problem opening

 

> it with Office or Word Perfect for that matter.

 

 

 

LIAR!

 

>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>

 

>>> If you were to send them an Open Office doc, they wouldn't know the

 

>>> difference.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>

 

>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did you miss that

 

>>> or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>

 

>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly express your

 

>> hatred for all things MS.

 

>

 

> You wish.

 

 

 

I know and this entire ng knows. Oh, and you too know.

 

Oops!

 

>

 

>> You're not fooling anyone...other than yourself. You've had 7 for just a

 

>> few weeks now and are still a lying linturd loser.

 

>

 

> I used to use XP and Ubuntu. Each has its own good points and bad

 

> points. Only sick perverts like you have an emotional attachment to an

 

> operating system or a software company.

 

 

 

Referring to yourself huh? You are the *SICK PERVERT* in here who has

 

been pushing that POS useless toy os you're so in love with.

 

Look cock sucker, all anyone needs to fulfill all of their OS

 

requirements is Windows 7, the very best OS available today.

 

Live with it *SPORT*.

 

Or eat shit and die, either way , I don't really care.

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>

 

>>> Most home users and most business users would not need Auto Cad nor

 

>>> would they need complicated Word docs.

 

>>

 

>> That is an opinion of yours and cannot be proven by any verifiable,

 

>> empirical data.

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how".

 

 

 

Thanks for proving my point, loser.

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>>>> Linux.

 

>>>

 

>>> I can cite governments that use Linux but they're not in the third

 

>>> world. Germany, Spain and France come to mind.

 

>>

 

>> No, you're wrong. Only some certain, small, agencies of those

 

>> governments use linux, not the entire governments of those Countries.

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

 

 

"governments" in the context you used clearly mean "the entire government".

 

 

 

You been caught lying through omission. The worst kind of lying.

 

 

 

 

>

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>

 

>>> Linux is better for some things and Windows is better for others.

 

>>

 

>> Not really. That is only your opinion. Windows 7 is all anyone needs to

 

>> use to do everything possible on a computer.

 

>>

 

>> Stop

 

>>> being such a nit picking twit who's cruisin' for a bruisin'.

 

>>

 

>> "cruisin' for a bruisin'...is that your new mantra?

 

>

 

> No, it's yours.

 

 

 

How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used that term twice

 

today and it is a childish term I'd never use.

 

>

 

>> Are you now

 

>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool out of you...or

 

>> you make a fool out of yourself and we all let you know it?

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> That would be your M.O.

 

 

 

No, it is yours.

 

 

 

You've threatened at least three people here and

 

> on Vista General.

 

 

 

LIAR, never happened.

 

 

 

Course, you weaseled out every time you were called on

 

> it.

 

 

 

LIAR, never happened.

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 6:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 8:54 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 5:29 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>> Parko wrote in

 

>>>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to inane

 

>>>> perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an 'argument'.....

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you can.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just like

 

>>>> Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

>>> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing about it,

 

>>> except yip!

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> You don't even own your own mind, much less someone anyone that posts

 

>> here.

 

>>

 

> Another response form one of my Pavlovian dogs...that I own.

 

> oops!

 

 

 

There you go again, declaring yourself the winner when you've actually

 

lost big time.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is caught lying...again...as usual.

 

On 7/7/2010 6:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 8:56 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 5:35 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 1:56 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes

 

>>>>>>>> with XP

 

>>>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider

 

>>>>>>>> Solitaire is

 

>>>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more

 

>>>>>>>> preloaded

 

>>>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai

 

>>>>>>> Customs

 

>>>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they

 

>>>>>>> had a

 

>>>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World

 

>>>>>>> it is

 

>>>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And

 

>>>>>>> this

 

>>>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the

 

>>>>>>> benefits of

 

>>>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately

 

>>>>>>> it is

 

>>>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are

 

>>>>>>> laughing

 

>>>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I can cite just as many governments that use Linux and, like your

 

>>>>>> examples, besides the point of my post. Facebook, Twitter, Email, IM,

 

>>>>>> WWW, etc. work just fine in Linux and much safer for the home user.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You seem to skate right over the points I raised. Not that Linux won't

 

>>>>> work, but that there times when only Windows will work.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> See my other reply.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Of course, that little bit of logic seems to be something that your

 

>>>>> one world operating system doesn't seem to accommodate well.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I advocate using both. Got any more erroneous guesses as to what I

 

>>>> think?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me, why is it

 

>>>>> that I have never had, with but one exception, and that from a pirated

 

>>>>> disk copy, had a virus or other form of mal ware that effected the

 

>>>>> operation of my computer in all the years I've been using one, and I

 

>>>>> do back to the Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user

 

>>>>> of community machines.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Is this because I am such a super man, or is it that perhaps, with

 

>>>>> even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is not the demon that you

 

>>>>> portray it as.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You are a geek. You know how to secure Windows. Most people don't which

 

>>>> is why 3 out of 5 Windows computers are infected and hundreds of

 

>>>> thousands of Windows computers are in bot nets bringing you spam and

 

>>>> malware straight to your in-box.

 

>>>>

 

>>> That is the one of the biggest GD lies you keep telling, yet when

 

>>> cornered and asked to provide the verifiable, empirical data, that you

 

>>> base that statement on, you disappear and provide nothing in the form of

 

>>> proof.

 

>>> You are a LIAR, LIAR and we all know it.

 

>>

 

>> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how."

 

>>

 

> I did...and it proves that you are a LIAR, LIAR!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

You don't know how to use Google then but what else is new?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 6:52 PM, Frank wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 9:01 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 5:46 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 4:37 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes with XP

 

>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>

 

>>>> So what?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> If I sent them an Open Office .doc, they wouldn't know the difference.

 

>>>

 

>>> Proof that you've never really been in any real business environment.

 

>>

 

>> Um, no it isn't. I do business with companies all over the world and

 

>> when I send them an Open Office document, they have no problem opening

 

>> it with Office or Word Perfect for that matter.

 

>

 

> LIAR!

 

>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> If you were to send them an Open Office doc, they wouldn't know the

 

>>>> difference.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did you miss that

 

>>>> or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>

 

>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly express your

 

>>> hatred for all things MS.

 

>>

 

>> You wish.

 

>

 

> I know and this entire ng knows. Oh, and you too know.

 

> Oops!

 

>>

 

>>> You're not fooling anyone...other than yourself. You've had 7 for just a

 

>>> few weeks now and are still a lying linturd loser.

 

>>

 

>> I used to use XP and Ubuntu. Each has its own good points and bad

 

>> points. Only sick perverts like you have an emotional attachment to an

 

>> operating system or a software company.

 

>

 

> Referring to yourself huh? You are the *SICK PERVERT* in here who has

 

> been pushing that POS useless toy os you're so in love with.

 

> Look cock sucker, all anyone needs to fulfill all of their OS

 

> requirements is Windows 7, the very best OS available today.

 

> Live with it *SPORT*.

 

> Or eat shit and die, either way , I don't really care.

 

>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Most home users and most business users would not need Auto Cad nor

 

>>>> would they need complicated Word docs.

 

>>>

 

>>> That is an opinion of yours and cannot be proven by any verifiable,

 

>>> empirical data.

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how".

 

>

 

> Thanks for proving my point, loser.

 

>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the benefits of

 

>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I can cite governments that use Linux but they're not in the third

 

>>>> world. Germany, Spain and France come to mind.

 

>>>

 

>>> No, you're wrong. Only some certain, small, agencies of those

 

>>> governments use linux, not the entire governments of those Countries.

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

>

 

> "governments" in the context you used clearly mean "the entire government".

 

>

 

> You been caught lying through omission. The worst kind of lying.

 

>

 

>

 

>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are laughing

 

>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Linux is better for some things and Windows is better for others.

 

>>>

 

>>> Not really. That is only your opinion. Windows 7 is all anyone needs to

 

>>> use to do everything possible on a computer.

 

>>>

 

>>> Stop

 

>>>> being such a nit picking twit who's cruisin' for a bruisin'.

 

>>>

 

>>> "cruisin' for a bruisin'...is that your new mantra?

 

>>

 

>> No, it's yours.

 

>

 

> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used that term twice

 

> today and it is a childish term I'd never use.

 

>>

 

>>> Are you now

 

>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool out of you...or

 

>>> you make a fool out of yourself and we all let you know it?

 

>>> Oops!

 

>>

 

>> That would be your M.O.

 

>

 

> No, it is yours.

 

>

 

> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>> on Vista General.

 

>

 

> LIAR, never happened.

 

>

 

> Course, you weaseled out every time you were called on

 

>> it.

 

>

 

> LIAR, never happened.

 

>

 

 

 

Try a guy name Steve and DanS. You also threatened Albright. And, of

 

course, you threatened me after I asked you if you had stopped fucking

 

your daughter yet which was a reply to your asking if I had stopped

 

stealing software yet.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 10:01 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 6:40 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 8:54 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 5:29 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>> Parko wrote in

 

>>>>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>>>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>>>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to inane

 

>>>>> perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an 'argument'.....

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you can.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just like

 

>>>>> Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

>>>> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing about it,

 

>>>> except yip!

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> You don't even own your own mind, much less someone anyone that posts

 

>>> here.

 

>>>

 

>> Another response form one of my Pavlovian dogs...that I own.

 

>> oops!

 

>

 

> There you go again, declaring yourself the winner when you've actually

 

> lost big time.

 

>

 

Keep dancing...uhhh responding...it's becoming pathetic and yet still funny.

 

Oops!

alias is caught lying...again...as usual.

 

On 7/7/2010 10:02 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 6:41 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 8:56 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 5:35 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 5:12 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 7/7/2010 1:56 PM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:55:05 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes

 

>>>>>>>>> with XP

 

>>>>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider

 

>>>>>>>>> Solitaire is

 

>>>>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more

 

>>>>>>>>> preloaded

 

>>>>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales

 

>>>>>>>>> compared to

 

>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one

 

>>>>>>>> must

 

>>>>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai

 

>>>>>>>> Customs

 

>>>>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is

 

>>>>>>>> "just as

 

>>>>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they

 

>>>>>>>> had a

 

>>>>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in

 

>>>>>>>> Auto

 

>>>>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World

 

>>>>>>>> it is

 

>>>>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager

 

>>>>>>>> on a

 

>>>>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And

 

>>>>>>>> this

 

>>>>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the

 

>>>>>>>> benefits of

 

>>>>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately

 

>>>>>>>> it is

 

>>>>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are

 

>>>>>>>> laughing

 

>>>>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I can cite just as many governments that use Linux and, like your

 

>>>>>>> examples, besides the point of my post. Facebook, Twitter, Email,

 

>>>>>>> IM,

 

>>>>>>> WWW, etc. work just fine in Linux and much safer for the home user.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You seem to skate right over the points I raised. Not that Linux

 

>>>>>> won't

 

>>>>>> work, but that there times when only Windows will work.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> See my other reply.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Of course, that little bit of logic seems to be something that your

 

>>>>>> one world operating system doesn't seem to accommodate well.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I advocate using both. Got any more erroneous guesses as to what I

 

>>>>> think?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You keep bemoaning the un safeness of Windows, so tell me, why is it

 

>>>>>> that I have never had, with but one exception, and that from a

 

>>>>>> pirated

 

>>>>>> disk copy, had a virus or other form of mal ware that effected the

 

>>>>>> operation of my computer in all the years I've been using one, and I

 

>>>>>> do back to the Apple Dos days on home machines and earlier as a user

 

>>>>>> of community machines.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Is this because I am such a super man, or is it that perhaps, with

 

>>>>>> even slightly sensible use, that mal ware is not the demon that you

 

>>>>>> portray it as.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You are a geek. You know how to secure Windows. Most people don't

 

>>>>> which

 

>>>>> is why 3 out of 5 Windows computers are infected and hundreds of

 

>>>>> thousands of Windows computers are in bot nets bringing you spam and

 

>>>>> malware straight to your in-box.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>> That is the one of the biggest GD lies you keep telling, yet when

 

>>>> cornered and asked to provide the verifiable, empirical data, that you

 

>>>> base that statement on, you disappear and provide nothing in the

 

>>>> form of

 

>>>> proof.

 

>>>> You are a LIAR, LIAR and we all know it.

 

>>>

 

>>> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how."

 

>>>

 

>> I did...and it proves that you are a LIAR, LIAR!

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> You don't know how to use Google then but what else is new?

 

>

 

You lying is not new. It is an everyday occurrence.

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheep lover!

 

Frank wrote in

 

news:4c349d63$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

 

> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>> Parko wrote in

 

>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>

 

>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>

 

>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>

 

>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to

 

>> inane perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an

 

>> 'argument'.....

 

>>

 

>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you

 

>> can.

 

>>

 

>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just

 

>> like Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>

 

>>

 

> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing

 

> about it, except yip!

 

> Oops!

 

 

 

Address the content of the post, hypocrite.

 

 

 

Pavlovian dog ? I wasn't even talking to you.

 

 

 

Let me refresh your memory. Look down in this thread where I

 

said nothing, yet you still replied to each and every post in

 

which I said nothing.

 

 

 

I'd say that's you being 'owned', hypocrite.

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

On 7/7/2010 10:05 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 7/7/2010 6:52 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>> On 7/7/2010 9:01 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>> On 7/7/2010 5:46 PM, Frank wrote:

 

>>>> On 7/7/2010 4:37 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>> On 07/07/2010 05:45 AM, J. D. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 17:21:28 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Aero Glass vs. Compiz

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Compiz beats out Aero hands down due Compiz being much more

 

>>>>>>> configurable.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Work Stations

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu beats out Windows 7 because it has more than one work

 

>>>>>>> station or

 

>>>>>>> desktop. To get more than one with Windows 7, one has to spend

 

>>>>>>> money on

 

>>>>>>> a third part program.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> File search

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows 7's file search is far superior to the one that comes

 

>>>>>>> with XP

 

>>>>>>> but is slow compared to Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> File transfer

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Internet speeds

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Boot up time.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still slower than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Safe surfing

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows is still more vulnerable than Linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Games that come with Windows

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I prefer the ones that come with XP over 7. Even Spider Solitaire is

 

>>>>>>> quicker in XP than Windows 7. Ubuntu comes with a lot more preloaded

 

>>>>>>> than either 7 or XP. Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Wallpaper and themes

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Windows 7 does win on this one as the wallpapers and themes are

 

>>>>>>> pretty

 

>>>>>>> cool in 7.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Cost:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> To have Windows 7 with PhotoShop and MS Office, we're talking more

 

>>>>>>> than

 

>>>>>>> a grand you have to spend. Of course, with Ubuntu, the cost is

 

>>>>>>> nothing.

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu wins again.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> All and all, Windows 7 is much better than XP but pales compared to

 

>>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Ah, but Alias, as you have been told many times before, "If one

 

>>>>>> needs/wants to run Windows applications, then in many cases one must

 

>>>>>> run Windows".

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> So what?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> If, for example, one needs/wants to communicate with the Thai Customs

 

>>>>>> Department one must use their forms if one wants to do this on the

 

>>>>>> Internet then one must use Windows and Office as that is what their

 

>>>>>> entire system is geared to. You may say that Open Office is "just as

 

>>>>>> good" but the Customs doesn't care no MS Office form, no

 

>>>>>> communication.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> If I sent them an Open Office .doc, they wouldn't know the difference.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Proof that you've never really been in any real business environment.

 

>>>

 

>>> Um, no it isn't. I do business with companies all over the world and

 

>>> when I send them an Open Office document, they have no problem opening

 

>>> it with Office or Word Perfect for that matter.

 

>>

 

>> LIAR!

 

>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> The Indonesian Customs was even worse. When I worked there they had a

 

>>>>>> pre-configured application that one needed to have to send/receive

 

>>>>>> communication through the Internet to their system. Linux may very

 

>>>>>> well be better, but they just didn't care. They used Windows.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> If you were to send them an Open Office doc, they wouldn't know the

 

>>>>> difference.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I have been involved with several projects where the client

 

>>>>>> communicated only Windows/Office documents and drawings only in Auto

 

>>>>>> Cad. If you couldn't do that then you couldn't work their contract.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did you miss that

 

>>>>> or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly express your

 

>>>> hatred for all things MS.

 

>>>

 

>>> You wish.

 

>>

 

>> I know and this entire ng knows. Oh, and you too know.

 

>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>>> You're not fooling anyone...other than yourself. You've had 7 for

 

>>>> just a

 

>>>> few weeks now and are still a lying linturd loser.

 

>>>

 

>>> I used to use XP and Ubuntu. Each has its own good points and bad

 

>>> points. Only sick perverts like you have an emotional attachment to an

 

>>> operating system or a software company.

 

>>

 

>> Referring to yourself huh? You are the *SICK PERVERT* in here who has

 

>> been pushing that POS useless toy os you're so in love with.

 

>> Look cock sucker, all anyone needs to fulfill all of their OS

 

>> requirements is Windows 7, the very best OS available today.

 

>> Live with it *SPORT*.

 

>> Or eat shit and die, either way , I don't really care.

 

>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> So you see Alias, while you may be correct in extolling Linux

 

>>>>>> unfortunately until the rest of the world becomes a Linux World it is

 

>>>>>> simply stupid to advocate the system for general use.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Most home users and most business users would not need Auto Cad nor

 

>>>>> would they need complicated Word docs.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> That is an opinion of yours and cannot be proven by any verifiable,

 

>>>> empirical data.

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> To quote YOU: "Use Google if you know how".

 

>>

 

>> Thanks for proving my point, loser.

 

>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> By the way, a friend who works for IBM and is a project manager on a

 

>>>>>> project to up-grade "K Bank", a large Thai Bank's entire computing

 

>>>>>> department - hardware, software, the whole caboodle, tells me that

 

>>>>>> some 12,000 work stations, nation wide, are being replaced, all of

 

>>>>>> which ran Windows and are being replaced with...... Windows. And this

 

>>>>>> is being done today, when people like you are shouting the

 

>>>>>> benefits of

 

>>>>>> Linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I can cite governments that use Linux but they're not in the third

 

>>>>> world. Germany, Spain and France come to mind.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, you're wrong. Only some certain, small, agencies of those

 

>>>> governments use linux, not the entire governments of those Countries.

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

>>

 

>> "governments" in the context you used clearly mean "the entire

 

>> government".

 

>>

 

>> You been caught lying through omission. The worst kind of lying.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> So you see, you may believe that Linux is better, unfortunately it is

 

>>>>>> not a matter of "laugh and the world laugh with you". You are

 

>>>>>> laughing

 

>>>>>> and the world isn't listening.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Cheers,

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> John D. Slocomb

 

>>>>>> (jdslocombatgmail)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Linux is better for some things and Windows is better for others.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Not really. That is only your opinion. Windows 7 is all anyone needs to

 

>>>> use to do everything possible on a computer.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Stop

 

>>>>> being such a nit picking twit who's cruisin' for a bruisin'.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> "cruisin' for a bruisin'...is that your new mantra?

 

>>>

 

>>> No, it's yours.

 

>>

 

>> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used that term twice

 

>> today and it is a childish term I'd never use.

 

>>>

 

>>>> Are you now

 

>>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool out of you...or

 

>>>> you make a fool out of yourself and we all let you know it?

 

>>>> Oops!

 

>>>

 

>>> That would be your M.O.

 

>>

 

>> No, it is yours.

 

>>

 

>> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>>> on Vista General.

 

>>

 

>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>>

 

>> Course, you weaseled out every time you were called on

 

>>> it.

 

>>

 

>> LIAR, never happened.

 

>>

 

>

 

> Try a guy name Steve and DanS.

 

 

 

Never happened.

 

 

 

You also threatened Albright.

 

 

 

Never happened.

 

 

 

And, of

 

> course, you threatened me after I asked you if you had stopped fucking

 

> your daughter yet which was a reply to your asking if I had stopped

 

> stealing software yet.

 

 

 

Sorry cock sucker, you obviously don't know the difference between

 

threatening someone with violence, which you do all the time, and

 

inviting someone to threaten in person.

 

Unlike you, the lying POS low-life asshole loser, I've never threatened

 

anyone overtly with violence in any ng. All I've ever done is ask them

 

if they'd like to threaten me in person.

 

So far, none of them, you included, have accepted my offer.

 

Got any more lies you like for me to expose?

 

If so, post them here --->

Does anyone really care...?

 

Frank wrote in news:4c349dce$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

 

> On 7/7/2010 5:22 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>> Frank wrote in news:4c33c738@news.x-

 

privat.org:

 

>>

 

>>> On 7/6/2010 5:11 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>> news:4c33c123$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 7/6/2010 2:59 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>> news:4c338d66$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 1:00 PM, DanS wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> Frank wrote in

 

>>>>>>>> news:4c337e6c$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/2010 8:21 AM, Alias wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> service-->

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Maybe 3-5 people in here care about your

 

>>>>>>>>> opinion...maybe!

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Like I said....

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Lee than that care about your opinion.

 

>>>>

 

>>> Obviously you do!...LOL!

 

>>>

 

>>

 

> WoW little boy. Do I push all of your buttons, or

 

what?...LOL!

 

>

 

 

 

It is you who is owned. This entire part of the thread where I

 

said absolutely nothing, yet you replied to each and every one

 

of them.

 

 

 

Fool.

alias is taught a lesson...!

 

>>>> You may have noticed that I advocate using both. How did

 

>>>> you miss that or were you too busy nit picking?

 

>>>

 

>>> That is only a facade that you think allows you to openly

 

>>> express your hatred for all things MS.

 

>>

 

>> You wish.

 

>

 

> I know and this entire ng knows.

 

 

 

Now you are claiming that you know what every person in this

 

newsgroup knows ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>> Read for content. I didn't write "entire governments".

 

>

 

> "governments" in the context you used clearly mean "the

 

> entire government".

 

>

 

> You been caught lying through omission. The worst kind of

 

> lying.

 

 

>

 

>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>> No, it's yours.

 

>

 

> How childish of you, seeing as how you've already used that

 

> term twice today and it is a childish term I'd never use.

 

 

 

Childish for using the same terms and saying over, and over,

 

and over, and over again ?

 

 

 

That's *exactly* what you do, hypocrite.

 

 

>>

 

>>> Are you now

 

>>> threatening physical violence when someone makes a fool

 

>>> out of you...or you make a fool out of yourself and we

 

>>> all let you know it? Oops!

 

>>

 

>> That would be your M.O.

 

>

 

> No, it is yours.

 

>

 

> You've threatened at least three people here and

 

>> on Vista General.

 

>

 

> LIAR, never happened.

 

 

 

You threatened Alias, and demanded my contact information so

 

you could kick my ass after I called your dog a

 

wife.......er....your wife a dog. I'm sure there were others

 

you had threatened.

 

 

 

Later, hypocrite.

parko is in love with alias...or maybe babba, his male sheeplover!

 

On 7/7/2010 10:32 AM, DanS wrote:

 

> Frank wrote in

 

> news:4c349d63$1@news.x-privat.org:

 

>

 

>> On 7/7/2010 7:56 AM, DanS wrote:

 

>>> Parko wrote in

 

>>> news:i10q14$5ej$1@news.eternal-september.org:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 19:13:49 -0700, Frank scrawled:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> You are that paranoid huh?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> All day long Fwank thinks of things but nothing seems to

 

>>>> satisfy Think He'll lose his mind if he don't find

 

>>>> something to pacify Can you help him occupy his brain?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> (with apologies to Ozzie)

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Notice how it's OK for Franker the Wanker to resort to

 

>>> inane perverted sexual insults when he's 'losing' an

 

>>> 'argument'.....

 

>>>

 

>>> Can you say hypocrite boys and girls........I know you

 

>>> can.

 

>>>

 

>>> I think you should start a thread whining about it, just

 

>>> like Frank does. (Not really.)

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>> Ahhhh...my little Pavlovian dogie yips up...as usual.

 

>> How does it feel knowing I own you yet you can do nothing

 

>> about it, except yip!

 

>> Oops!

 

>

 

> Address the content of the post, hypocrite.

 

>

 

 

 

Why are you responding to me? Is that Pavlovian response unstoppable?

 

 

> Pavlovian dog ? I wasn't even talking to you.

 

 

 

Really? Then you don't know what you're doing.

 

>

 

> Let me refresh your memory. Look down in this thread where I

 

> said nothing, yet you still replied to each and every post in

 

> which I said nothing.

 

>

 

> I'd say that's you being 'owned', hypocrite.

 

 

 

Oh so you only re-posted my post which is a reply, you stupid pile of

 

useless hypocritical shit.

 

Go fuck yourself or have alias or babba do it for you.

 

You're a real asshole loser.