64 bit question

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>

>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>

>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>

>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>

You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of

what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>

>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>

>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>

>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>

You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of

what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do

>>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>

>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>

>

> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the messenger

> and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of what

> honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>

> --

> Alias

You don't understand facts. All you understand is your will to try and

hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want. When

presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion". Can't

deal with someone like you with reason.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do

>>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>

>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>

>

> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the messenger

> and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of what

> honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>

> --

> Alias

You don't understand facts. All you understand is your will to try and

hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want. When

presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion". Can't

deal with someone like you with reason.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they

>>>>>>>>>>> do not

>>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>>

>>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>>

>>

>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> You don't understand facts.

First insult.

> All you understand is your will to try and

> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

Second insult.

> When

> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

Third insult.

> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>

Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they

>>>>>>>>>>> do not

>>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>>

>>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>>

>>

>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> You don't understand facts.

First insult.

> All you understand is your will to try and

> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

Second insult.

> When

> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

Third insult.

> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>

Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>

>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> You don't understand facts.

>

> First insult.

What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

ignore what was written.

>

>> All you understand is your will to try and

>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>

> Second insult.

Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>> When

>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>

> Third insult.

Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

confronted with fact.

You really need to find something else to do.

>

>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>

> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>

> --

> Alias

It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

"Alias" wrote in message

news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>

>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> You don't understand facts.

>

> First insult.

What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

ignore what was written.

>

>> All you understand is your will to try and

>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>

> Second insult.

Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>> When

>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>

> Third insult.

Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

confronted with fact.

You really need to find something else to do.

>

>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>

> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>

> --

> Alias

It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>

>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You don't understand facts.

>>

>> First insult.

>

> What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your

> question. When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl

> insults and ignore what was written.

>

>>

>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>

>> Second insult.

>

> Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum

> and you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>>

>>> When

>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>

>> Third insult.

>

> Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

> confronted with fact.

>

> You really need to find something else to do.

>

>>

>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>

>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

> valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black

> and white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>

It's only in black in white in your color blind and twisted mind.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 4, 201014 yr

Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>

> "Alias" wrote in message

> news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>

>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You don't understand facts.

>>

>> First insult.

>

> What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your

> question. When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl

> insults and ignore what was written.

>

>>

>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>

>> Second insult.

>

> Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum

> and you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>>

>>> When

>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>

>> Third insult.

>

> Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

> confronted with fact.

>

> You really need to find something else to do.

>

>>

>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>

>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

> It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

> valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black

> and white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>

It's only in black in white in your color blind and twisted mind.

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:28:08 +0200, Alias

wrote:

>On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which I

>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this problem.

>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you have, if

>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web browser in a

>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will get

>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>

>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>

>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>

>And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

Well, I'm not into horses so hardly "cute". Clever? No, reciting

common knowledge. So neither cute or clever. Just factual.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:28:08 +0200, Alias

wrote:

>On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>> wrote:

>>

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which I

>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this problem.

>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you have, if

>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web browser in a

>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>

>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will get

>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>

>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>

>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>

>> John B. Slocomb

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>

>And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

Well, I'm not into horses so hardly "cute". Clever? No, reciting

common knowledge. So neither cute or clever. Just factual.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:31:42 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which

>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you have,

>>>>>>>>>> if

>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web browser

>>>>>>>>> in a

>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will get

>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>

>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>

>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>

>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>

See Alias? A vote for my side of the question.... John leading the

pack with 1 vote... Alias trailing with none.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:31:42 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>> wrote:

>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which

>>>>>>>>>>> I

>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you have,

>>>>>>>>>> if

>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web browser

>>>>>>>>> in a

>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will get

>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>

>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>

>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>

>>> John B. Slocomb

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>

>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>

See Alias? A vote for my side of the question.... John leading the

pack with 1 vote... Alias trailing with none.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:34:51 +0200, Alias

wrote:

>Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>

>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>

>

>You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of

>what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

Stop trying to change the subject. The subject is whether Alias is a

horses ass or not with Alias claiming that he isn't and everyone else

stating that he is.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:34:51 +0200, Alias

wrote:

>Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do not

>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>

>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>

>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>

>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>

>

>You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of

>what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

Stop trying to change the subject. The subject is whether Alias is a

horses ass or not with Alias claiming that he isn't and everyone else

stating that he is.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:37:34 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do

>>>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>>

>>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>>

>>

>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the messenger

>> and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of what

>> honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>You don't understand facts. All you understand is your will to try and

>hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want. When

>presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion". Can't

>deal with someone like you with reason.

>

Well alias, that is three votes against and zero for.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:37:34 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>>

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do

>>>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>

>>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>>

>>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>>

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>

>>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>>

>>

>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the messenger

>> and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of what

>> honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>You don't understand facts. All you understand is your will to try and

>hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want. When

>presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion". Can't

>deal with someone like you with reason.

>

Well alias, that is three votes against and zero for.

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:44:39 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>

>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You don't understand facts.

>>

>> First insult.

>

>What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

>When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

>ignore what was written.

>

>>

>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>

>> Second insult.

>

>Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

>you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>>

>>> When

>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>

>> Third insult.

>

>Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

>confronted with fact.

>

>You really need to find something else to do.

>

>>

>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>

>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

>valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

>white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>

Four to nothing Alias. when are you going to concede defeat?

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:44:39 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

wrote:

>

>"Alias" wrote in message

>news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>

>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>

>>>> --

>>>> Alias

>>>

>>> You don't understand facts.

>>

>> First insult.

>

>What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

>When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

>ignore what was written.

>

>>

>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>

>> Second insult.

>

>Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

>you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>

>>

>>> When

>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>

>> Third insult.

>

>Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

>confronted with fact.

>

>You really need to find something else to do.

>

>>

>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>

>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>

>> --

>> Alias

>

>It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

>valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

>white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>

Four to nothing Alias. when are you going to concede defeat?

John B. Slocomb

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

> GUEST wrote:

> Hi Guys,

> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

videos on

> you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which I

did but

> still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this problem.

> Thanks and Regards

> Bob

You need latest Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.45.2.

It supports windows 7 64-bit operating system. You can download from

the Adobe website. This is the best solution for it.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

> GUEST wrote:

> Hi Guys,

> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to watch

videos on

> you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in which I

did but

> still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this problem.

> Thanks and Regards

> Bob

You need latest Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.45.2.

It supports windows 7 64-bit operating system. You can download from

the Adobe website. This is the best solution for it.

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:44:39 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

> wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>

>>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> You don't understand facts.

>>>

>>> First insult.

>>

>> What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

>> When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

>> ignore what was written.

>>

>>>

>>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>>

>>> Second insult.

>>

>> Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

>> you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>>

>>>

>>>> When

>>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>>

>>> Third insult.

>>

>> Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

>> confronted with fact.

>>

>> You really need to find something else to do.

>>

>>>

>>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>>

>>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

>> valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

>> white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>>

> Four to nothing Alias. when are you going to concede defeat?

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

When are you going to grow up?

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:44:39 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

> wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub6os$j6j$2@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>

>>>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the

>>>>> messenger and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea

>>>>> of what honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> You don't understand facts.

>>>

>>> First insult.

>>

>> What insult? It's in black and white and I am responding to your question.

>> When presented with a valid argument and/or facts, you hurl insults and

>> ignore what was written.

>>

>>>

>>>> All you understand is your will to try and

>>>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want.

>>>

>>> Second insult.

>>

>> Again fact. Look at your history of posting. This is the Windows forum and

>> you are trying to shove Ubuntu down our throats. Get over it.

>>

>>>

>>>> When

>>>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion".

>>>

>>> Third insult.

>>

>> Again, it's in black and white. That is what you mostly say when you are

>> confronted with fact.

>>

>> You really need to find something else to do.

>>

>>>

>>>> Can't deal with someone like you with reason.

>>>>

>>> Fourth LYING insult. You just proved my point, moron.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> It's true. When presented with fact, you dismiss it and can't argue any

>> valid point. You have little to no reasoning abilities. It's in black and

>> white. You choose to ignore it. Not my problem.

>>

> Four to nothing Alias. when are you going to concede defeat?

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

When are you going to grow up?

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

June 5, 201014 yr

John B. Slocomb wrote:

> On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 08:37:34 -0700, "Epsom F. Shagnasty"

> wrote:

>

>>

>> "Alias" wrote in message

>> news:hub6et$i71$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>> Epsom F. Shagnasty wrote:

>>>>

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>> news:hub628$gkk$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>> On 06/04/2010 02:38 PM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:34:26 +0200, Alias

>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

>>>>>>>> On Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:34 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

>>>>>>>>>> news:hu7s3v$gqe$1@news.eternal-september.org...

>>>>>>>>>>> DJT wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:13:22 +0200, Alias

>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> BH2 wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Guys,

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have installed windows 7 64 bit edition, and am unable to

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> watch

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> videos

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on you tube etc, Windows said I needed to install a plug in

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which I

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> did

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but still does not work. Any ideas on how to correct this

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and Regards

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bob

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You need 64 bit Flash. Try looking here:

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ to see what you

>>>>>>>>>>>>> have, if

>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything, installed.

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look at Adobe's web page you will find out that they do

>>>>>>>>>>>> not

>>>>>>>>>>>> have a 64 bit version of Flash. You must run a 32 bit Web

>>>>>>>>>>>> browser in a

>>>>>>>>>>>> 64 bit OS

>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>> DJT

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> You're right. They only have 64 bit BETA for Linux. My mistake. I

>>>>>>>>>>> guess Windows will have to wait while Linux already has it.

>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>> --

>>>>>>>>>>> Alias

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>> You better run and tell the world about this! Take 10,000 CD's to

>>>>>>>>>> another country and pass them out. Maybe if you're lucky you will

>>>>>>>>>> get

>>>>>>>>>> another 5 users! LOL!

>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>> Who do you think I am, AOL?

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> Apparently he knows who you are...

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> If you think that, you're more clueless than I thought.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Perhaps but they have certainly identified you as a horses ass.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

>>>>>

>>>>> And you think you're being cute and clever with this post?

>>>>>

>>>>> --

>>>>> Alias

>>>>

>>>> I don't think he was being cute and clever. Just honest.

>>>>

>>>

>>> You can't denigrate Linux with facts so you hurl insults at the messenger

>>> and think you're being honest? You have a very strange idea of what

>>> honesty is, especially when you consider how often you LIE.

>>>

>>> --

>>> Alias

>>

>> You don't understand facts. All you understand is your will to try and

>> hoodwink people to switch to that SHITTY OS that most don't want. When

>> presented with facts, you spew out, "It's an ill informed opinion". Can't

>> deal with someone like you with reason.

>>

>

> Well alias, that is three votes against and zero for.

>

> John B. Slocomb

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

And the contest is sponsored by whom, you and your dick?

--

Alias

Quote

Mark as Solution

Sign In

64 bit question

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

Featured Replies

Popular Days

Join the conversation

Popular Days

Account

Navigation

Search