<snipped>

 

It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user *clowns*

posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and lunatics. The

man has been working in IT longer than most of them have most likely been

alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out classed but they

don't know that. :)

 

I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

 

LOL!!!!!

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> <snipped>

>

> It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user

> *clowns* posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and

> lunatics. The man has been working in IT longer than most of them have

> most likely been alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out

> classed but they don't know that. :)

>

> I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

>

> LOL!!!!!

 

And you know all of the above how? Do you include yourself as one of the

"clowns" posting to the thread? Are you a troll? A lunatic? Both? Geez!!

--

norm

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:54:59 -0400, norm <noone@afakeddomain.net>

wrote:

>Mr. Arnold wrote:

>> <snipped>

>>

>> It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user

>> *clowns* posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and

>> lunatics. The man has been working in IT longer than most of them have

>> most likely been alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out

>> classed but they don't know that. :)

>>

>> I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

>>

>> LOL!!!!!

>

>And you know all of the above how? Do you include yourself as one of the

>"clowns" posting to the thread? Are you a troll? A lunatic? Both? Geez!!

 

This newsgroup is infested with way too many wannabe types like the

jerk "Mr. Arnold" and stuck-up Leythos, neither of which really know a

damn thing. I've been working with computers since the late 60's and

can spot a phony a mile away. These two gold bricks are a riot to

read!

 

How many Bozos you know that demands he be addressed as Mr. in a

informal setting like a newsgroup? That alone speaks volumes. The guy

is class A jerk and wannabe desperately looking for attention.

 

Leythos is a legend in his own mind and gets off boasting. Two

laughable clowns. Newsgroups are infested with such losers and one

thing for sure, they make most people laugh.

In article <ebl4kuu4HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

> <snipped>

>

> It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user *clowns*

> posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and lunatics. The

> man has been working in IT longer than most of them have most likely been

> alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out classed but they

> don't know that. :)

>

> I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

>

> LOL!!!!!

 

I've given up on trying to reason with them. I see that Adam is one of

the biggest, rudest, nasty, trolls in the group and can't actually find

a reason to chat with him. At least Kurt (not seen in a long time) was

ethical and reasonable, even if I didn't agree with his piracy points.

Adam is just plain disrespectful and nasty and can't seem to make a post

without hate injected in it.

 

It is funny watching them, but as I get older it's gone from funny to

feeling sorry (not compassion) for them and their failure to get

anything healthy out of life.

 

I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with at

least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

You can simply crawl back into your hole.

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

news:MPG.213389afb36dcfad989922@adfree.Usenet.com...

> In article <ebl4kuu4HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

> Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>> <snipped>

>>

>> It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user

>> *clowns*

>> posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and lunatics.

>> The

>> man has been working in IT longer than most of them have most likely been

>> alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out classed but they

>> don't know that. :)

>>

>> I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

>>

>> LOL!!!!!

>

> I've given up on trying to reason with them. I see that Adam is one of

> the biggest, rudest, nasty, trolls in the group and can't actually find

> a reason to chat with him. At least Kurt (not seen in a long time) was

> ethical and reasonable, even if I didn't agree with his piracy points.

> Adam is just plain disrespectful and nasty and can't seem to make a post

> without hate injected in it.

 

I don't see this Kurt. I must have killfiled it out of the gate. And old

Adam Hopalong, I gave him a hot moment, but realized all he wants to do is

flame dance so he hit the KF too.

 

You'll do good to just ignore those kind of posters. In some ways, this NG

with trolls and lunatics running loose in it is the worst I have seen.

>

> It is funny watching them, but as I get older it's gone from funny to

> feeling sorry (not compassion) for them and their failure to get

> anything healthy out of life.

>

 

Yeah, it gets pretty old quick in dealing with them. What life some of

these people have other than the Internet is a mystery, with some having the

Internet as their only reason for existence on Earth it seems.

> I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

> street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with at

> least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

 

Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back 4/2007,

when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

 

Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy with it, and

I'll never go back to XP.

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:22:34 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

>In article <ebl4kuu4HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

>Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>> <snipped>

>>

>> It's kind of funny to watch this. Leythos has a bunch of home user *clowns*

>> posting to him in the NG and in this thread, mainly trolls and lunatics. The

>> man has been working in IT longer than most of them have most likely been

>> alive, both MS and Linux platforms. He has them all out classed but they

>> don't know that. :)

>>

>> I know you're reading this Leythos, and man it is funny.

>>

>> LOL!!!!!

>

>I've given up on trying to reason with them. I see that Adam is one of

>the biggest, rudest, nasty, trolls in the group and can't actually find

>a reason to chat with him. At least Kurt (not seen in a long time) was

>ethical and reasonable, even if I didn't agree with his piracy points.

>Adam is just plain disrespectful and nasty and can't seem to make a post

>without hate injected in it.

 

You're as phony as a three dollar bill. Why should I be nice to a

phony?

>

>It is funny watching them, but as I get older it's gone from funny to

>feeling sorry (not compassion) for them and their failure to get

>anything healthy out of life.

 

What I "get" out of this newsgroup is dethroning phonies like you that

waltz in here, crow what a "expert" you claim to be then watch you

fall flat on your face. <snicker>

>

>I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

>street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with at

>least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

 

Translation: This phony computer "expert" can't figure out how to use

Vista and needs to retreat back to XP. LOL!

 

Hint #1

It took me all of five minutes to "figure out" what's new/different in

Vista. Who's the REAL expert?

 

Hint #2

By DESIGN, Microsoft hasn't and likely never will make any major

changes in how you navigate your way around within Windows. Changes in

Vista are mostly cosmetic. Nothing has changed drastically at the

fundamental level. Windows is still the same old Windows it always

was. Things that are annoying like UAC, can easily be turned off.

 

So if you know how to use ANY version of Windows and you have at least

average intelligence you shouldn't have any real difficulty using any

newer version of Windows and the changes/new/different features.

 

Microsoft does assumes you can read. Further they assumes you are

willing to read up on what has been changed. It is all contained in

the build in help. My guess, 99.9% of users don't even look at the

included help system. Too bad, it is better than ever in Vista and

includes animation and useful examples including graphics and

extensive hand holding for those wishing that plus more technical

details for those wishing to learn that.

 

Lastly Microsoft assumes you know how to point and click and

understand many options are accessed by starting with right clicking

on objects. An example would be image files. If you simply left click

on a image file it shows a thumbnail or spawns a viewer if you double

click. However if you right click on a image file you get presented

with many options, still more if you click on properties and go on

from there.

 

All VERY simple. Really, but you need to be willing to help yourself.

Sadly many people are too lazy for that.

In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

> > I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

> > street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with at

> > least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>

> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back 4/2007,

> when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

>

> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy with it, and

> I'll never go back to XP.

 

Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista well,

but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's going to fly

with XP or 2003 on it.

 

I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people that

make money off having a computer (technical types).

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

news:MPG.213389afb36dcfad989922@adfree.Usenet.com...

> I've given up on trying to reason with them. I see that Adam is one of

> the biggest, rudest, nasty, trolls in the group and can't actually find

> a reason to chat with him. At least Kurt (not seen in a long time) was

> ethical and reasonable, even if I didn't agree with his piracy points.

> Adam is just plain disrespectful and nasty and can't seem to make a post

> without hate injected in it.

 

If we're talking the same Kurt, I miss him. He riled up a lot of people but

made a heck of a lot of interesting points along the way.

"Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

> In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

> Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>> > I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

>> > street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with

>> > at

>> > least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>>

>> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back 4/2007,

>> when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

>>

>> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

>> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy with it,

>> and

>> I'll never go back to XP.

>

> Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista well,

> but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's going to fly

> with XP or 2003 on it.

>

> I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people that

> make money off having a computer (technical types).

 

I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations for part

of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS 622, while the

rest were on NT class O/S machines.

 

It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI -- the need.

In article <ev#P5814HHA.5844@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>

> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

> news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

> > In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

> > Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

> >> > I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on the

> >> > street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been replaced with

> >> > at

> >> > least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

> >>

> >> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back 4/2007,

> >> when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

> >>

> >> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

> >> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy with it,

> >> and

> >> I'll never go back to XP.

> >

> > Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista well,

> > but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's going to fly

> > with XP or 2003 on it.

> >

> > I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people that

> > make money off having a computer (technical types).

>

> I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations for part

> of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS 622, while the

> rest were on NT class O/S machines.

>

> It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI -- the need.

 

The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get Office

2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most people have

enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a complete PIG,

and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the screen, even under

Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any more.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:30:07 -0400, Leythos <void@nowhere.lan> wrote:

 

>The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get Office

>2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most people have

>enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a complete PIG,

>and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the screen, even under

>Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any more.

 

You can't be trying very hard.

 

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Microsoft+Office+2003&btnG=Google+Search

> The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get Office

> 2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most people have

> enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a complete PIG,

> and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the screen, even under

> Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any more.

>

 

Yeah, I like Office 2003 myself and have it in storage with the rest of my

stuff, while on the road. I am getting pretty use to Microsoft Works now on

Vista.

 

I'll be in Columbus for an interview with a consulting firm, for hopefully a

fulltime position with them. I am tired of moving around the US contracting.

:)

In article <u9E$ZP24HHA.4676@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>

>

> > The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get Office

> > 2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most people have

> > enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a complete PIG,

> > and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the screen, even under

> > Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any more.

> >

>

> Yeah, I like Office 2003 myself and have it in storage with the rest of my

> stuff, while on the road. I am getting pretty use to Microsoft Works now on

> Vista.

>

> I'll be in Columbus for an interview with a consulting firm, for hopefully a

> fulltime position with them. I am tired of moving around the US contracting.

> :)

 

Yep, I started my own company a long time ago, was on the road 50 weeks

a year doing sales and design work, was a pain living in a hotel all

that time. I quit that crap and have never been happier - now when I

take a job outside the area it's because I want it and I can take the

family with me for a mini-vacation.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

In article <u9E$ZP24HHA.4676@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>

>

> > The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get Office

> > 2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most people have

> > enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a complete PIG,

> > and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the screen, even under

> > Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any more.

> >

>

> Yeah, I like Office 2003 myself and have it in storage with the rest of my

> stuff, while on the road. I am getting pretty use to Microsoft Works now on

> Vista.

>

> I'll be in Columbus for an interview with a consulting firm, for hopefully a

> fulltime position with them. I am tired of moving around the US contracting.

> :)

 

Send me an email to the spamfree account below

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

> news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

>> In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

>> Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>>>> I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on

>>>> the street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been

>>>> replaced with at

>>>> least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>>>

>>> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back

>>> 4/2007, when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

>>>

>>> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

>>> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy

>>> with it, and

>>> I'll never go back to XP.

>>

>> Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista

>> well, but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's

>> going to fly with XP or 2003 on it.

>>

>> I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people

>> that make money off having a computer (technical types).

>

> I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations

> for part of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS

> 622, while the rest were on NT class O/S machines.

>

> It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI --

> the need.

 

But where is the need now, with Vista? What would most people get in

Vista that they don't ready have in XP or other?

 

-saran

Leythos wrote:

> In article <ev#P5814HHA.5844@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

> Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>>

>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

>> news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

>>> In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold"

>>> <MR. Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>>>>> I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on

>>>>> the street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been

>>>>> replaced with at

>>>>> least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>>>>

>>>> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back

>>>> 4/2007, when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door

>>>> stop.

>>>>

>>>> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

>>>> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy

>>>> with it, and

>>>> I'll never go back to XP.

>>>

>>> Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista

>>> well, but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's

>>> going to fly with XP or 2003 on it.

>>>

>>> I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people

>>> that make money off having a computer (technical types).

>>

>> I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations

>> for part of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS

>> 622, while the rest were on NT class O/S machines.

>>

>> It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI --

>> the need.

>

> The thing that really sucks is when MS makes it impossible to get

> Office 2003 now. Office 2003 was/is stable, works well and most

> people have enough computer to use it without lag. Office 2007 is a

> complete PIG, and I can actually type faster than it puts it on the

> screen, even under Win XP systems. I can't even order Office 2003 any

> more.

 

That's the big problem with Micorsoft... they jsut don't get it that

people want to have a choice rather than being practically forced to the

new version, even if just by lack of supply of the previous version as

you described. Office 2003 is a pretty solid version, runs fine on my

old laptop too (an old pentium 2)... and I'm just shudder at the thought

of attempting to run 2007 on it.

 

-saran

"Saran" <none@nospam> wrote in message

news:eU7Ybu24HHA.1484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

>> news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

>>> In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

>>> Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>>>>> I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on

>>>>> the street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been

>>>>> replaced with at

>>>>> least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>>>>

>>>> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back

>>>> 4/2007, when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door stop.

>>>>

>>>> Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of both .Net

>>>> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy

>>>> with it, and

>>>> I'll never go back to XP.

>>>

>>> Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista

>>> well, but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's

>>> going to fly with XP or 2003 on it.

>>>

>>> I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people

>>> that make money off having a computer (technical types).

>>

>> I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations

>> for part of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS

>> 622, while the rest were on NT class O/S machines.

>>

>> It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI --

>> the need.

>

> But where is the need now, with Vista? What would most people get in Vista

> that they don't ready have in XP or other?

 

That's for the end-user to determine as to what he or she wants, not you

or I. Or am I missing something here?

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> You can simply crawl back into your hole.

Not everyone participating in the thread attacked Leythos. You painted

with a broad brush, and your inattention to whom you were including in

your "defense" of him speaks volumes.

 

--

norm

"norm" <noone@afakeddomain.net> wrote in message

news:%23XUUzt34HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>> You can simply crawl back into your hole.

> Not everyone participating in the thread attacked Leythos. You painted

> with a broad brush, and your inattention to whom you were including in

> your "defense" of him speaks volumes.

 

The only thing that speaks volumes is that you need to run your mouth, which

your mouth will be ignored now -- crawl back into your hole.

 

This is a that's a soft logical .

In article <ueMfjz24HHA.5424@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>, none@nospam says...

> That's the big problem with Micorsoft... they jsut don't get it that

> people want to have a choice rather than being practically forced to the

> new version, even if just by lack of supply of the previous version as

> you described. Office 2003 is a pretty solid version, runs fine on my

> old laptop too (an old pentium 2)... and I'm just shudder at the thought

> of attempting to run 2007 on it.

 

I'm running it on 9 machines, all of them are single core CPU's or

P4/3.2Ghz machines, 2 or more GB RAM, SATA-II drives, fast video cards

(256MB or less), and it's just a pig for performance.

 

--

 

Leythos

- Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.

- Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling a

drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"

spam999free@rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> "norm" <noone@afakeddomain.net> wrote in message

> news:%23XUUzt34HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>>> You can simply crawl back into your hole.

>> Not everyone participating in the thread attacked Leythos. You

>> painted with a broad brush, and your inattention to whom you were

>> including in your "defense" of him speaks volumes.

>

> The only thing that speaks volumes is that you need to run your

> mouth, which your mouth will be ignored now -- crawl back into your

> hole.

> This is a that's a soft logical .

 

And who made you a newgroup moderator? When did you become he who

decides who can say what and when?

 

--

Wayne

Mr. Arnold wrote:

> "Saran" <none@nospam> wrote in message

> news:eU7Ybu24HHA.1484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>>> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message

>>> news:MPG.2133add86ce84f2e989929@adfree.Usenet.com...

>>>> In article <enND3w04HHA.2312@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl>, "Mr. Arnold"

>>>> <MR. Arnold@Arnold.com> says...

>>>>>> I've decided to move back from Vista to XP until Vista's been on

>>>>>> the street for 12 months and until enough hardware has been

>>>>>> replaced with at

>>>>>> least Core 2 Duo machines with 512MB Video cards.

>>>>>

>>>>> Vista came on this new HP dv9000 Entertainment laptop I got back

>>>>> 4/2007, when the laptop that was running XP Pro became a door

>>>>> stop. Vista Ultimate has done everything I have asked of it of

>>>>> both .Net

>>>>> development and entertainment wise with no problems. I am happy

>>>>> with it, and

>>>>> I'll never go back to XP.

>>>>

>>>> Yep, I can see that on the newest hardware it would handle Vista

>>>> well, but, if it's running vista at an acceptable speed then it's

>>>> going to fly with XP or 2003 on it.

>>>>

>>>> I've been unable to find any ROI in Vista for businesses or people

>>>> that make money off having a computer (technical types).

>>>

>>> I have been in companies that were still using Win 9'x workstations

>>> for part of its work force with some even down to Win 3'x and DOS

>>> 622, while the rest were on NT class O/S machines.

>>>

>>> It's like with anything that deals with Risk Management and ROI --

>>> the need.

>>

>> But where is the need now, with Vista? What would most people get in

>> Vista that they don't ready have in XP or other?

>

> That's for the end-user to determine as to what he or she wants, not

> you or I. Or am I missing something here?

 

I agree the actual "need" is not for you or I to decide, but the the

question of what one gets in Vista that they cannot get in XP remains.

 

-saran

>

> And who made you a newgroup moderator? When did you become he who

> decides who can say what and when?

 

Do you think I really care? Man go get a life if you can find it. :)

On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 18:58:24 -0400, "Mr. Arnold" <MR.

Arnold@Arnold.com> wrote:

>

>"norm" <noone@afakeddomain.net> wrote in message

>news:%23XUUzt34HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>>> You can simply crawl back into your hole.

>> Not everyone participating in the thread attacked Leythos. You painted

>> with a broad brush, and your inattention to whom you were including in

>> your "defense" of him speaks volumes.

>

>The only thing that speaks volumes is that you need to run your mouth, which

>your mouth will be ignored now -- crawl back into your hole.

>

>This is a that's a soft logical .

 

It is abundantly clear that any Bozo that feels he needs to include

Mister in his posts has some serious low self-esteem issues.

 

ROTFLMAO!