Guest thanatoid Posted May 17, 2010 Posted May 17, 2010 "J. P. Gilliver (John)" wrote in news:AtFxddetGH8LFwE4@soft255.demon.co.uk: > In message , > thanatoid writes: > [] >>have to do with some programs I installed. If I find a >>program that doesn't run under Win98SELite, I find an >>alternative. > > Do you always succeed though? I can't remember /not/ succeeding, let's put it this way. Very new hardware with only XP + drivers is the exception, of course, as mentioned in the OP. >>Few have figured out that you don't need ANY MS software >>except the OS, if that's what you're stuck with. I read >>somewhere there is still code from the 80's in Vista. There >>may well be. > > That's not necessarily a bad thing! It's probably the code > that works most reliably and economically. VERY theoretically, yes, but probably not when it's part of an OS that's supposed to run machines built in 2010. > [] > [] What IS this crap above? -- "Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect." - Mark Twain Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.