Jump to content

Ubuntu Lucid Lynx 64 Bit

Guest Alias
Guest Alias
in Tech Help and Discussions

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:33:30 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> False.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>>>> when one can use both?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>>>

 

>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

>>

 

>> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>>

 

>> John B. Slocomb

 

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>

 

>Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

 

>the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but who

 

>didn't?

 

 

 

Advocate using Windows? I'm afraid I missed that one. Could you point

 

me at the URL?

 

 

 

John B. Slocomb

 

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •
    • Replies 144
    • Views 4k
    • Created
    • Last Reply

    Popular Days

    On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >Raven wrote:

     

    >> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

     

    >>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

     

    >>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

     

    >>>>>>> do. Now

     

    >>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

     

    >>>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

     

    >>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

     

    >>> who didn't?

     

    >>

     

    >> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

     

    >

     

    >Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in

     

    >context. Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said

     

    >many times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

     

     

     

     

     

    Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    prove your veracity)

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> Raven wrote:

     

    >>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

     

    >>>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

     

    >>>>>>>> do. Now

     

    >>>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

     

    >>>>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

     

    >>>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >>>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

     

    >>>> who didn't?

     

    >>>

     

    >>> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

     

    >>

     

    >> Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in

     

    >> context. Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said

     

    >> many times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > Like you said many times?

     

     

     

    Yep.

     

     

    > As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    > missed that.

     

     

     

    I'm not surprised.

     

     

     

    could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    > prove your veracity)

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:33:30 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

     

    >>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

     

    >>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

     

    >>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>

     

    >>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

     

    >>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but who

     

    >> didn't?

     

    >

     

    > Advocate using Windows?

     

     

     

    Not exactly. I advocate it for certain uses.

     

     

    > I'm afraid I missed that one.

     

     

     

    Do you think you'll get over it?

     

     

    > Could you point

     

    > me at the URL?

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    Why should I?

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> Raven wrote:

     

    >>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

     

    >>>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

     

    >>>>>>>> do. Now

     

    >>>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

     

    >>>>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

     

    >>>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >>>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

     

    >>>> who didn't?

     

    >>>

     

    >>> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

     

    >>

     

    >> Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in

     

    >> context. Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said

     

    >> many times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    > missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    > prove your veracity)

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    be a man and say so.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 5/23/2010 6:25 AM, Alias wrote:

     

    > John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> Raven wrote:

     

    >>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> times.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> message.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

     

    >>>>>>>>> do. Now

     

    >>>>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to

     

    >>>>>>>>> choose

     

    >>>>>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out

     

    >>>>>> that

     

    >>>>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>>>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>>>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>>>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >>>>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

     

    >>>>> who didn't?

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in

     

    >>> context. Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said

     

    >>> many times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

     

    >>

     

    >>

     

    >> Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >> missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >> prove your veracity)

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    > I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    > by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    > be a man and say so.

     

    >

     

    Better yet, explain to everyone in here why you don't seem to know the

     

    difference between telling the truth and lying. If you don't know,

     

    be a man and say so.

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 5/23/2010 6:23 AM, Alias wrote:

     

    > John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 11:33:30 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

     

    >>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> SNIP

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

     

    >>>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

     

    >>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

     

    >>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

     

    >>>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many

     

    >>>>>>>>> times.

     

    >>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

     

    >>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

     

    >>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> False.

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

     

    >>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

     

    >>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

     

    >>>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

     

    >>>>>>> do. Now

     

    >>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to

     

    >>>>>>> choose

     

    >>>>>>> when one can use both?

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

     

    >>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

     

    >>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

     

    >>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

     

    >>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

     

    >>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

     

    >>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but who

     

    >>> didn't?

     

    >>

     

    >> Advocate using Windows?

     

    >

     

    > Not exactly. I advocate it for certain uses.

     

    >

     

    >> I'm afraid I missed that one.

     

    >

     

    > Do you think you'll get over it?

     

    >

     

    >> Could you point

     

    >> me at the URL?

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    > Why should I?

     

    >

     

    You can't can you. Be a man, if you can, and admit you're a balless

     

    little POS MS hating lying linturd pimp.

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

     

    >> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >> missed that.

     

    >

     

    >I'm not surprised.

     

    >

     

    > could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >> prove your veracity)

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    >No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

     

     

     

     

    IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    excuses you decline?

     

     

     

    That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    veracity, doesn't it.

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:25:32 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

     

    >> Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >> missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >> prove your veracity)

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    >I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    >by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >be a man and say so.

     

     

     

     

     

    A rather weak riposte, isn't it? when you recently made a type and

     

    argued that "everyone makes typos" as justification?

     

     

     

    As I have said (now many times) a hypocrite!

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>

     

    >>>

     

    >>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>

     

    >>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >> of you.

     

    >

     

    > Obviously.

     

    >

     

    > However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    > cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    > suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    You're erroneously assuming that I am affected by low life trolls like

     

    you, Frank and the Nymshifter.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>

     

    >>>

     

    >>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>

     

    >>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >> of you.

     

    >

     

    > Obviously.

     

    >

     

    > However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    > cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    > suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    Copernicus, Galileo, Columbus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and all the

     

    Buddhas were cursed and ridiculed so I am in good company.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >

     

    >>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>> missed that.

     

    >>

     

    >> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>

     

    >> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    > excuses you decline?

     

    >

     

    > That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    > veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    of you.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 05/24/2010 03:35 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:25:32 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >

     

    >>> Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>> missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    >> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >> be a man and say so.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > A rather weak riposte, isn't it? when you recently made a type and

     

    > argued that "everyone makes typos" as justification?

     

     

     

    You just made a typo and a grammar mistake. Your justification is?

     

     

    >

     

    > As I have said (now many times) a hypocrite!

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 5/24/2010 3:53 AM, Alias wrote:

     

    > On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>> missed that.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>

     

    >>

     

    >> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >> excuses you decline?

     

    >>

     

    >> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    > Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    > just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    > is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    > of you.

     

    >

     

     

     

    Translation: alias has been caught lying...again...as usual!

     

    Oops!

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 5/24/2010 3:55 AM, Alias wrote:

     

    > On 05/24/2010 03:35 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:25:32 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>>> Like you said many times? As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>> missed that. could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    >>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >>> be a man and say so.

     

    >>

     

    >>

     

    >> A rather weak riposte, isn't it? when you recently made a type and

     

    >> argued that "everyone makes typos" as justification?

     

    >

     

    > You just made a typo and a grammar mistake. Your justification is?

     

    >

     

    >>

     

    >> As I have said (now many times) a hypocrite!

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    > Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    > loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

    >

     

    Projecting will get you nowhere.

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    "Alias" wrote in message

     

    news:htdluk$pvs$3@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you are

     

    >>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >>> be a man and say so.

     

    >

     

    > Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    > loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

     

     

    LOL, it looks like you certainly don't know. Unless, of course, you blame

     

    it on a typo.

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    Raven wrote:

     

    > "Alias" wrote in message

     

    > news:htdluk$pvs$3@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you

     

    >>>> are

     

    >>>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >>>> be a man and say so.

     

    >>

     

    >> Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    >> loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

    >

     

    > LOL, it looks like you certainly don't know. Unless, of course, you

     

    > blame it on a typo.

     

     

     

    Oh, I know.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 5/24/2010 4:21 PM, Alias wrote:

     

    > Raven wrote:

     

    >> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >> news:htdluk$pvs$3@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you

     

    >>>>> are

     

    >>>>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >>>>> be a man and say so.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    >>> loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

    >>

     

    >> LOL, it looks like you certainly don't know. Unless, of course, you

     

    >> blame it on a typo.

     

    >

     

    > Oh, I know.

     

    >

     

    You know jack-shit about anything...except lying...your expertise.

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>> missed that.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>

     

    >>

     

    >> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >> excuses you decline?

     

    >>

     

    >> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    >Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >of you.

     

     

     

    Obviously.

     

     

     

    However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    "Alias" wrote in message

     

    news:htf1mo$o34$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    > Raven wrote:

     

    >> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >> news:htdluk$pvs$3@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you

     

    >>>>> are

     

    >>>>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't know,

     

    >>>>> be a man and say so.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    >>> loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

    >>

     

    >> LOL, it looks like you certainly don't know. Unless, of course, you

     

    >> blame it on a typo.

     

    >

     

    > Oh, I know.

     

     

     

    So it was a deliberate typo? Just curious.

     

    > Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On 05/25/2010 06:35 AM, Raven wrote:

     

    > "Alias" wrote in message

     

    > news:htf1mo$o34$1@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >> Raven wrote:

     

    >>> "Alias" wrote in message

     

    >>> news:htdluk$pvs$3@news.eternal-september.org...

     

    >>>>>> I'm still waiting for you to show us how perfectly knowledgeable you

     

    >>>>>> are

     

    >>>>>> by explaining when to use "a" and when to use "an". If you don't

     

    >>>>>> know,

     

    >>>>>> be a man and say so.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> Don't know, eh? Can't find it with Google, eh? LOL, what a uneducated

     

    >>>> loser who can only desperately grasp at straws.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> LOL, it looks like you certainly don't know. Unless, of course, you

     

    >>> blame it on a typo.

     

    >>

     

    >> Oh, I know.

     

    >

     

    > So it was a deliberate typo? Just curious.

     

    >> Alias

     

    >

     

     

     

    Typos are never deliberate, dumb fuck. I suggest you take a reading

     

    comprehension class before posting again.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:18:30 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >>> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >>> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >>> of you.

     

    >>

     

    >> Obviously.

     

    >>

     

    >> However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    >> cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    >> suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    >You're erroneously assuming that I am affected by low life trolls like

     

    >you, Frank and the Nymshifter.

     

     

     

     

     

    Obviously you aren't effected. that is what I said (above) and as I

     

    also wrote, it is obvious that you suffer from some mental impairment

     

    that leads you to seek out reticule and insults. Does it give you a

     

    warm, fuzzy feeling to know that thousands see your posts, and detest

     

    you?

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:27:06 +0200, Alias

     

    wrote:

     

     

    >John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >> On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    >> wrote:

     

    >>

     

    >>> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >>> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >>> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >>> of you.

     

    >>

     

    >> Obviously.

     

    >>

     

    >> However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    >> cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    >> suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >>

     

    >> John B. Slocomb

     

    >> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >

     

    >Copernicus, Galileo, Columbus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and all the

     

    >Buddhas were cursed and ridiculed so I am in good company.

     

     

     

     

     

    Oh? How many Buddhas have there been? And what is the evidence for you

     

    stating that they were cursed and ridiculed?

     

     

     

    Yet again I suggest that you are ignorant of what you are posting

     

     

     

    John B. Slocomb

     

    (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:18:30 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>>>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>>>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >>>> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >>>> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >>>> of you.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Obviously.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    >>> cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    >>> suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> You're erroneously assuming that I am affected by low life trolls like

     

    >> you, Frank and the Nymshifter.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > Obviously you aren't effected.

     

     

     

    "effected"?

     

     

    > that is what I said (above) and as I

     

    > also wrote, it is obvious that you suffer from some mental impairment

     

    > that leads you to seek out reticule and insults.

     

     

     

    Yawn. You really are desperate.

     

     

    > Does it give you a

     

    > warm, fuzzy feeling to know that thousands see your posts, and detest

     

    > you?

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    You're talking about three trolls, yourself included. BFD.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    > On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:27:06 +0200, Alias

     

    > wrote:

     

    >

     

    >> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>> On Mon, 24 May 2010 12:53:35 +0200, Alias

     

    >>> wrote:

     

    >>>

     

    >>>> On 05/24/2010 03:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 15:22:18 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

     

    >>>>>>> On Sun, 23 May 2010 12:42:34 +0200, Alias

     

    >>>>>>> wrote:

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> As I said in another post, I'm afraid I

     

    >>>>>>> missed that.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> I'm not surprised.

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> could you point me at a URL, or maybe several? (just to

     

    >>>>>>> prove your veracity)

     

    >>>>>>>

     

    >>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>>>

     

    >>>>>> No, because I don't really care if you believe me or not.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> IN other words, we suspect you of lying we ask you to justify your

     

    >>>>> excuses you decline?

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> That really does build an insurmountable mountain of faith in your

     

    >>>>> veracity, doesn't it.

     

    >>>>>

     

    >>>>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>>>

     

    >>>> Like I said, your opinion of me and your opinion of what I should post

     

    >>>> just isn't important to me. Live with it and get the fuck over it. There

     

    >>>> is no reason why I should have to prove or justify anything to the likes

     

    >>>> of you.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> Obviously.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> However, the inclination to frequent a local where you are continually

     

    >>> cursed and ridiculed is interesting. One can only assume that you

     

    >>> suffer from some sort of mental weakness - masochism, perhaps.

     

    >>>

     

    >>> John B. Slocomb

     

    >>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

    >>

     

    >> Copernicus, Galileo, Columbus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King and all the

     

    >> Buddhas were cursed and ridiculed so I am in good company.

     

    >

     

    >

     

    > Oh? How many Buddhas have there been?

     

     

     

    Millions in the universe. On this planet, thousands.

     

     

    > And what is the evidence for you

     

    > stating that they were cursed and ridiculed?

     

     

     

    LOL! You need history lessons too? Figures.

     

     

    >

     

    > Yet again I suggest that you are ignorant of what you are posting

     

    >

     

    > John B. Slocomb

     

    > (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

     

     

     

    And you'd be dead wrong.

     

     

     

    --

     

    Alias

  • Quote
  • Mark as Solution
    •

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing