Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

 

>

 

>

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht30mh$4he$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:50:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:04:13 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 05/19/2010 04:15 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 14:13:50 -0700, "Heywood Jablowme"

 

>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:hsu91v$mgv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:hssjsd$940$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hsm0hb$lkp$7@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 05/15/2010 06:27 AM, Drew wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Numbnuts! Win7 boots in 39 seconds on this machine ..

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 19 seconds

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> difference and I have a real op system!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> q6600 Intel quad

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8gigs ddr2 1000

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Boot drive is a Intel 80 gig ssd drive

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the rest is on Velociraptors

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opening programs and/or doing anything on this beast is

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like changing

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> channels.. Yeah it is that fast!!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quad booting 98/xp/vista/ and 7 just because I can!!

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> My XP install boots in 39 seconds on a Seagate SATA drive.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> You must

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a fucked up Windows 7 install to be booting so slow

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> with an SSD

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> drive.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have an XP machine and a Windows 7 machine? Sounds

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> like you LOVE

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft because you are supporting them with your

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> purchases. I guess

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu just doesn't cut it now does it? Oops.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> You're like Sarah Palin. You say there's no choice and then you

 

>>>>>>>>>>> choose. Why choose when you can have all of it? Some things

 

>>>>>>>>>>> run better

 

>>>>>>>>>>> in one and others in others.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> There is a choice.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Not to you.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Never said that there wasn't one.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Yes you did.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> You're too stupid

 

>>>>>>>>>> to figure it out.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Compared to you, I'm a genius.

 

>>>>>>>>> --

 

>>>>>>>>> Alias

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Oh yea. You are the "genius" who tries to shove Ubuntu down the

 

>>>>>>>> throats of

 

>>>>>>>> people who already have Windows 7. Is that the "genius" you are

 

>>>>>>>> talking

 

>>>>>>>> about? LOL!

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Nope. He is the genius that thinks the Registry is the Windows

 

>>>>>>> kernel

 

>>>>>>> and the Ubuntu is built on Gnome. He was wrong on those two

 

>>>>>>> counts so

 

>>>>>>> the validity of he present statement is somewhat in doubt.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> This from the man who wants everyone to think he never makes mistakes

 

>>>>>> and is Mr Perfect.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Nice personal attack.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, an objective observation.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> But to clear away the smoke I am not Mr.

 

>>>>> Perfect, except when a caparison is made with Alias.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Really? Name some mistakes you think you've made.

 

>>>

 

>>> Well, mistaking you for a reasonably intelligent individual, for one.

 

>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>

 

>> Do you even know what you just did?

 

>>

 

>> --

 

>> Alias

 

>

 

> I'm sure he knows. I'm sure you don't!

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

You and "know" don't compute.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

  • Replies 144
  • Views 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bill Yanaire, ESQ wrote:

 

>

 

>

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht30o4$4he$2@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:51:21 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:11:56 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 05/19/2010 04:19 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 18:40:36 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> On 05/17/2010 11:23 PM, Heywood Jablowme wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>> news:hsm0l2$lkp$8@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>> On 05/15/2010 01:18 PM, Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>>> news:hskmjj$g7j$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:hsk2dt$9q6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wow, now this is a fast OS! Programs open in less than a

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blink of the

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eye and it only takes 20 seconds to cold boot into Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even ubuntards hate lucid.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> Leave your friends out of it.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Your not my friend.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> I didn't say you were. You're putting words in my mouth again.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> Check it out at alt.os.linux.ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> I see no such thing.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Of course you don't...you're an ubuntard.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> No, there is no such thing to see.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> http://ubuntard.com/about/

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>> nouveau kills nvidia...more at 11.00.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>> My nVidia card works wonderfully. Oops.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> Well, of course it does, numbskull ... I'm sure Thunderbird

 

>>>>>>>>>>> looks just

 

>>>>>>>>>>> fine.

 

>>>>>>>>>>> But if you need more than 6 FPS, then nouveau sucks.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/xserver-xorg-video-nouveau

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> *Everything* works just fine. I guess I'm just lucky.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You are so full of shit. If you had a problem you would never

 

>>>>>>>>> admit it.

 

>>>>>>>>> I'll bet your machine screws up all the time. You have to enter

 

>>>>>>>>> cryptic

 

>>>>>>>>> line commands to get shit to work, you have to research drivers

 

>>>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>>>> figure out what to install which takes you hours. You will

 

>>>>>>>>> never admit it.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I haven't had any of those problems. I haven't used the command

 

>>>>>>>> line in

 

>>>>>>>> over four versions. You obviously don't know jack shit about the

 

>>>>>>>> latest

 

>>>>>>>> Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Better stick with Windows XP and Windows 7. You stated that you

 

>>>>>>>>> own

 

>>>>>>>>> both. Microsoft products just work. Ditch that SHITTY Ubuntu.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Both work but Ubuntu is MUCH easier to install and set up.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Ah yes. Wisdom from the fellow that has written:

 

>>>>>>> "You are putting words in my mouth again. Not only have I posted

 

>>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>>> I am not a computer expert, I have never claimed to know everything

 

>>>>>>> about computers. "

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> *No* *one* knows everything about computers, not even you, the guy

 

>>>>>> who

 

>>>>>> presents himself as Mr Computer Expert who never makes a mistake. It

 

>>>>>> must be lonely being so perfect and all. Course, a perfect person

 

>>>>>> would

 

>>>>>> also have a sense of humility ...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> It is difficult to be humble when dealing with a fool, and a fool you

 

>>>>> are.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Everyone is part fool, part genius. I admit my mistakes. Why don't you?

 

>>>

 

>>> Boy! that is a platitude if I ever heard one. You have certainly

 

>>> displayed your foolish portion. Now how about a view of the Genius?

 

>>>

 

>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>

 

>> I'm still waiting for you to tell us when "a" and "an" are used but

 

>> I'm not holding my breath.

 

>>

 

>> --

 

>> Alias

 

>

 

> So that's your "genius"? LOL!

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

I didn't expect you to know the answer and you met all expectations.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

 

 

SNIP

 

>

 

> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>

 

 

 

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

 

 

Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

About time.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Death wrote:

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>

 

> SNIP

 

>>

 

>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>

 

>

 

> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

 

 

Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

 

>

 

> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

 

 

I don't have that installed.

 

 

> About time.

 

>

 

 

 

It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

that happening.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Death wrote:

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>

 

>> SNIP

 

>>>

 

>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>

 

> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times. That,

 

> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>

 

> I don't have that installed.

 

>

 

>> About time.

 

>>

 

>

 

> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of that

 

> happening.

 

>

 

 

 

 

 

I've been doing some analysis.

 

http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

 

 

In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

 

 

Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

 

 

Why is that?

 

It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell it for

 

100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

Very strange.

 

Must be something wrong with linux.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Death wrote:

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> Death wrote:

 

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>

 

>>> SNIP

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>

 

>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times. That,

 

>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>

 

>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>

 

>>> About time.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of that

 

>> happening.

 

>>

 

>

 

>

 

> I've been doing some analysis.

 

> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>

 

> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>

 

> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>

 

> Why is that?

 

> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell it for

 

> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

> Very strange.

 

> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>

 

 

 

No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Death wrote:

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>

 

>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>> That,

 

>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>

 

>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>

 

>>>> About time.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>> that

 

>>> happening.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>

 

>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>

 

>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>

 

>> Why is that?

 

>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell it for

 

>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>> Very strange.

 

>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>

 

>

 

> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>

 

 

 

A non answer.

 

How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

 

 

It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

 

 

Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid POS to

 

connect to the internet.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Death wrote:

 

>

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> Death wrote:

 

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>> That,

 

>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>>> that

 

>>>> happening.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>

 

>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>

 

>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>

 

>>> Why is that?

 

>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell it for

 

>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>> Very strange.

 

>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>

 

>

 

> A non answer.

 

 

 

No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

 

> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>

 

> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>

 

> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid POS to

 

> connect to the internet.

 

>

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Death wrote:

 

>>

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>> That,

 

>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>>>> that

 

>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>

 

>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell it

 

>>>> for

 

>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> A non answer.

 

>

 

> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>

 

>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>

 

>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>

 

>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid POS to

 

>> connect to the internet.

 

>>

 

>

 

 

 

Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

The food is free.

 

You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

 

 

How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

My guess would be a few hours.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Death wrote:

 

>

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> Death wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>> That,

 

>>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell

 

>>>>> it for

 

>>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> A non answer.

 

>>

 

>> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>>

 

>>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>>

 

>>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>>

 

>>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid POS to

 

>>> connect to the internet.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>

 

> Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

> The food is free.

 

> You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

>

 

> How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

> My guess would be a few hours.

 

>

 

 

 

Very bad analogy. Most people are scared shitless of reinstalling

 

Windows, much less prepared to install Linux. MOST computer users buy a

 

computer with the OS preinstalled. Where have you been, wandering around

 

looking for free road kill to eat?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht66ef$obs$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Death wrote:

 

>>

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>> That,

 

>>>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>>>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell

 

>>>>>> it for

 

>>>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>>>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> A non answer.

 

>>>

 

>>> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>>>

 

>>>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid POS

 

>>>> to

 

>>>> connect to the internet.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

>> The food is free.

 

>> You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

>>

 

>> How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

>> My guess would be a few hours.

 

>>

 

>

 

> Very bad analogy.

 

 

 

No it isn't.

 

If linux was worth a damn, it would spread like wildfire.

 

 

> Most people are scared shitless of reinstalling Windows, much less

 

> prepared to install Linux.

 

 

 

Most people?

 

Got a figure?

 

Another ubuntard guess?

 

There are a billion PCs.

 

If 25% experience a software problem, that's 250,000,000 visits to some

 

knucklehead like yourself.

 

You are aware of linux, others who fix computers are aware...yet it

 

stagnates @ 1%.

 

You and other ubuntards claim to install it to the pleasure of everyone you

 

meet.

 

Yet, it doesn't grow.

 

Something doesn't add up.

 

 

> MOST computer users buy a computer with the OS preinstalled. Where have

 

> you been,

 

 

 

Linux comes pre-installed.

 

Where have you been?

 

Walmart dumped bricked ubuntard PCs because they all came back.

 

Dell pulled ubuntard PCs from catalogs because they were a huge success?

 

 

 

Welcome to linux la-la-land.

 

Must be a conspiracy to keep it a POS.

 

 

>wandering around looking for free road kill to eat?

 

 

 

If you run over a porterhouse, I'll eat it.

 

Maybe side swipe a baked potato while you're at it.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

On 5/21/2010 7:47 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> Death wrote:

 

>>

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>> That,

 

>>>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much hope of

 

>>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error range.

 

>>>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell

 

>>>>>> it for

 

>>>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>>>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> A non answer.

 

>>>

 

>>> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>>>

 

>>>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid

 

>>>> POS to

 

>>>> connect to the internet.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

>> The food is free.

 

>> You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

>>

 

>> How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

>> My guess would be a few hours.

 

>>

 

>

 

> Very bad analogy.

 

 

 

Wrong! You are just too stupid to understand a real analogy.

 

 

 

Most people are scared shitless of reinstalling Windows,...

 

 

 

Says who? You? Where did you get that information from?

 

 

 

much less prepared to install Linux.

 

 

 

Most people think linux is a POS for losers...losers just like you.

 

 

 

MOST computer users buy a

 

> computer with the OS preinstalled. Where have you been, wandering around

 

> looking for free road kill to eat?

 

 

 

WoW! You do like taking it up your ass don't you.

 

>

Death wrote:

 

>

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:ht66ef$obs$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> Death wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>> news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>>> That,

 

>>>>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much

 

>>>>>>>> hope of

 

>>>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error

 

>>>>>>> range.

 

>>>>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell

 

>>>>>>> it for

 

>>>>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason and

 

>>>>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> A non answer.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid

 

>>>>> POS to

 

>>>>> connect to the internet.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

>>> The food is free.

 

>>> You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

>>>

 

>>> How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

>>> My guess would be a few hours.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> Very bad analogy.

 

>

 

> No it isn't.

 

 

 

Yes, it is.

 

 

> If linux was worth a damn, it would spread like wildfire.

 

 

 

No it wouldn't.

 

 

>

 

>> Most people are scared shitless of reinstalling Windows, much less

 

>> prepared to install Linux.

 

>

 

> Most people?

 

 

 

Hey, the man can read!

 

 

> Got a figure?

 

 

 

Nope.

 

 

> Another ubuntard guess?

 

 

 

Nope.

 

 

> There are a billion PCs.

 

 

 

No, there aren't.

 

 

> If 25% experience a software problem, that's 250,000,000 visits to some

 

> knucklehead like yourself.

 

 

 

Hey, the man can use his calculator!

 

 

> You are aware of linux, others who fix computers are aware...yet it

 

> stagnates @ 1%.

 

> You and other ubuntards claim to install it to the pleasure of everyone

 

> you meet.

 

> Yet, it doesn't grow.

 

> Something doesn't add up.

 

 

 

Yeah, it's your brain.

 

 

>

 

>> MOST computer users buy a computer with the OS preinstalled. Where

 

>> have you been,

 

>

 

> Linux comes pre-installed.

 

 

 

Not really.

 

 

> Where have you been?

 

 

 

Enjoying my life.

 

 

> Walmart dumped bricked ubuntard PCs because they all came back.

 

 

 

Yeah and Walmart shoppers are famous for being smart.

 

 

> Dell pulled ubuntard PCs from catalogs because they were a huge success?

 

 

 

You're too fucking easy:

 

 

 

http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=us&l=en&cs=&k=ubuntu&cat=all&x=0&y=0

 

 

>

 

> Welcome to linux la-la-land.

 

 

 

Your home?

 

 

> Must be a conspiracy to keep it a POS.

 

 

 

Wrong again.

 

 

>

 

>> wandering around looking for free road kill to eat?

 

>

 

> If you run over a porterhouse, I'll eat it.

 

> Maybe side swipe a baked potato while you're at it.

 

>

 

 

 

I don't drive a car. You'll have to ask Frank to find your meals for you.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:ht6duo$huf$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Death wrote:

 

>>

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht66ef$obs$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5tbc$jnv$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5rv8$9a6$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:ht5qdi$tq2$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many

 

>>>>>>>>> times.

 

>>>>>>>>> That,

 

>>>>>>>>> however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> Getting bored with that ubuntard OS?

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> I don't have that installed.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> About time.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> It's about time you became an adult but I doubt there's much

 

>>>>>>>>> hope of

 

>>>>>>>>> that

 

>>>>>>>>> happening.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I've been doing some analysis.

 

>>>>>>>> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> In one month, Linux lost 10 percent of its users.

 

>>>>>>>> Did 6 ubuntards all go on vacation at the same time?

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Also, with a 1% share, Linux falls outside the margin of error

 

>>>>>>>> range.

 

>>>>>>>> That means, statistically, Linux doesn't exist.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Why is that?

 

>>>>>>>> It's like free, you can download it all friggen day, you can sell

 

>>>>>>>> it for

 

>>>>>>>> 100% profit ... and yet it's an abhorrent aberration.

 

>>>>>>>> Very strange.

 

>>>>>>>> Must be something wrong with linux.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> No, there's something seriously wrong with your ability to reason

 

>>>>>>> and

 

>>>>>>> think without letting your bias and prejudice interfere.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> A non answer.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No, one you proved with this nonsense:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> How surprising you'd pull an alias.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> It's defies all logical thought, does it not?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Perhaps it has 10X the user base, they just can't get that stupid

 

>>>>>> POS to

 

>>>>>> connect to the internet.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Lets say a restaurant opens in the town you live in.

 

>>>> The food is free.

 

>>>> You can tip if you wish, but you're not obligated.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> How long before word of mouth creates 5 hour waiting lines?

 

>>>> My guess would be a few hours.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> Very bad analogy.

 

>>

 

>> No it isn't.

 

>

 

> Yes, it is.

 

>

 

>> If linux was worth a damn, it would spread like wildfire.

 

>

 

> No it wouldn't.

 

>

 

>>

 

>>> Most people are scared shitless of reinstalling Windows, much less

 

>>> prepared to install Linux.

 

>>

 

>> Most people?

 

>

 

> Hey, the man can read!

 

>

 

>> Got a figure?

 

>

 

> Nope.

 

>

 

>> Another ubuntard guess?

 

>

 

> Nope.

 

>

 

>> There are a billion PCs.

 

>

 

> No, there aren't.

 

>

 

 

 

Well, maybe only 999,924,763.

 

Close enough for an ubuntard.

 

 

>> If 25% experience a software problem, that's 250,000,000 visits to some

 

>> knucklehead like yourself.

 

>

 

> Hey, the man can use his calculator!

 

>

 

 

 

Actually, if you need a calculator for that, you're an ubuntard.

 

 

 

 

>> You are aware of linux, others who fix computers are aware...yet it

 

>> stagnates @ 1%.

 

>> You and other ubuntards claim to install it to the pleasure of everyone

 

>> you meet.

 

>> Yet, it doesn't grow.

 

>> Something doesn't add up.

 

>

 

> Yeah, it's your brain.

 

>

 

 

 

My non-ubuntard brain.

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>>> MOST computer users buy a computer with the OS preinstalled. Where

 

>>> have you been,

 

>>

 

>> Linux comes pre-installed.

 

>

 

> Not really.

 

>

 

 

 

It's not popular ,no, but what does that say?

 

 

 

 

>> Where have you been?

 

>

 

> Enjoying my life.

 

>

 

 

 

What you can remember of it...hehehe.

 

 

 

 

>> Walmart dumped bricked ubuntard PCs because they all came back.

 

>

 

> Yeah and Walmart shoppers are famous for being smart.

 

>

 

 

 

Numbers, all about numbers ... should have been easy to dump the ubuntard OS

 

on them.

 

 

 

 

>> Dell pulled ubuntard PCs from catalogs because they were a huge success?

 

>

 

> You're too fucking easy:

 

>

 

> http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=us&l=en&cs=&k=ubuntu&cat=all&x=0&y=0

 

>

 

 

 

That's not a catalog.

 

I get one in the mail ... no ubuntard OS offering in some time.

 

 

 

All of the ones you found list Windows first.

 

 

 

 

>>

 

>> Welcome to linux la-la-land.

 

>

 

> Your home?

 

>

 

>> Must be a conspiracy to keep it a POS.

 

>

 

> Wrong again.

 

>

 

 

 

It's a POS all on its own?

 

 

>>

 

>>> wandering around looking for free road kill to eat?

 

>>

 

>> If you run over a porterhouse, I'll eat it.

 

>> Maybe side swipe a baked potato while you're at it.

 

>>

 

>

 

> I don't drive a car. You'll have to ask Frank to find your meals for you.

 

>

 

 

 

Ask your bus driver to hit it, I don't care.

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>Death wrote:

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>

 

>> SNIP

 

>>>

 

>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>

 

>Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

anything that a user wishes... And then we discover that he posts his

 

paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

 

 

No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

 

 

John B. Slocomb

 

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> Death wrote:

 

>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>

 

>>> SNIP

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>

 

>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>

 

>

 

> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

> anything that a user wishes...

 

 

 

False.

 

 

> And then we discover that he posts his

 

> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

 

 

I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

 

>

 

> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>

 

> John B. Slocomb

 

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

 

 

I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

when one can use both?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>

 

>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>

 

>False.

 

>

 

>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>

 

>I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>

 

>> John B. Slocomb

 

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>

 

>I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>when one can use both?

 

 

 

 

 

In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

 

 

As I said, a hypocrite.

 

 

 

John B. Slocomb

 

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>

 

>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>

 

>> False.

 

>>

 

>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>

 

>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>

 

>>>

 

>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>

 

>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>

 

>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>> when one can use both?

 

>

 

>

 

> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

 

 

No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

 

>

 

> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>

 

> John B. Slocomb

 

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

 

 

And no. I have *always* said I use both and thereby get the best of both

 

worlds. That said, I do not include Vista or Windows Me in those worlds.

 

 

 

I'm still waiting for you to tell us when one should use "a" and when

 

one should use "an" but I am not holding my breath.

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

On 5/22/2010 4:03 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>

 

>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>

 

> False.

 

>

 

>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>

 

> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>

 

You are a fucking LIAR, LIAR!

 

>>

 

>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>

 

>> John B. Slocomb

 

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>

 

> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do.

 

 

 

No you don't. You hate MS, don't have Windows 7, and push that POS toy

 

os for losers like you in this W 7 ng, so stop LYING LIAR!

 

 

 

Now

 

> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

> when one can use both?

 

 

 

What a stupid ignorant statement. One only needs one OS...Windows 7.

 

Period!

 

Live with it you lying linturd asshole!

 

>

On 5/22/2010 4:50 AM, Alias wrote:

 

> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>

 

>>> False.

 

>>>

 

>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>

 

>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>

 

>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>> when one can use both?

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>

 

> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

 

 

You don't have Windows 7, do you LIAR.

 

>

 

>>

 

>> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>>

 

>> John B. Slocomb

 

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>

 

> And no. I have *always* said I use both and thereby get the best of both

 

> worlds.

 

 

 

There is no such thing as "best of both worlds". Only a broke, MS hating

 

asshole like you, would make such a stupid statement.

 

 

 

That said, I do not include Vista or Windows Me in those worlds.

 

>

 

> I'm still waiting for you to tell us when one should use "a" and when

 

> one should use "an" but I am not holding my breath.

 

 

 

Why? You think that is important?

 

You're that stupid, aren't you. Go fuck yourself, you POS loser.

 

>

 

>

On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

wrote:

 

 

>John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>

 

>>> False.

 

>>>

 

>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>

 

>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>

 

>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>> when one can use both?

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>

 

>No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>

 

 

 

You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

 

 

As I said, a hypocrite.

 

 

 

John B. Slocomb

 

(johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>>

 

>>>> False.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>

 

>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do. Now

 

>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>>> when one can use both?

 

>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>>

 

>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>>

 

>

 

> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

>

 

> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>

 

> John B. Slocomb

 

> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

 

 

Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

 

the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but who

 

didn't?

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

>> wrote:

 

>>

 

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> False.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I do.

 

>>>>> Now

 

>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>>>> when one can use both?

 

>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>>>

 

>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>>>

 

>>

 

>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

>>

 

>> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>>

 

>> John B. Slocomb

 

>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>

 

> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have the

 

> best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but who

 

> didn't?

 

 

 

"Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

Raven wrote:

 

> "Alias" wrote in message

 

> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

>>> wrote:

 

>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many times.

 

>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> False.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

 

>>>>>> do. Now

 

>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to choose

 

>>>>>> when one can use both?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>>>>

 

>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>>>>

 

>>>

 

>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

>>>

 

>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>>>

 

>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>

 

>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

 

>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

 

>> who didn't?

 

>

 

> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

 

 

 

Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in

 

context. Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said

 

many times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

 

 

 

--

 

Alias

"Alias" wrote in message

 

news:htb0qs$iig$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

> Raven wrote:

 

>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>> news:htaspc$2j4$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:50:00 +0200, Alias

 

>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>

 

>>>>> John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>> On Sat, 22 May 2010 13:03:43 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> On 05/22/2010 06:31 AM, John B. Slocomb wrote:

 

>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 May 2010 13:22:23 +0200, Alias

 

>>>>>>>> wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Death wrote:

 

>>>>>>>>>> "Alias" wrote in message

 

>>>>>>>>>> news:ht5pgr$nhp$1@news.eternal-september.org...

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> SNIP

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>> You and "know" don't compute.

 

>>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>>> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows U Windows NT 5.1 en-US

 

>>>>>>>>>> rv:1.9.1.9)

 

>>>>>>>>>> Gecko/20100317 SeaMonkey/2.0.4

 

>>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>> Yep, I use both Windows and Ubuntu and I have stated so many

 

>>>>>>>>> times.

 

>>>>>>>>> That, however, won't stop you from posting another inane message.

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> I'm not so sure that it is inane. Alias has trumpeted it to the

 

>>>>>>>> heavens that Linux in general, and Ubuntu specifically, can do

 

>>>>>>>> anything that a user wishes...

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> False.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> And then we discover that he posts his

 

>>>>>>>> paean of love using the despised Windows?

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I don't hate anything except hatred.

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> No, not inane, but truth and Alias is exposed as a hypocrite that

 

>>>>>>>> preaches one sermon and then turns sneaks away and sins..

 

>>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>>>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>> I always said that one should use the best of both worlds and I

 

>>>>>>> do. Now

 

>>>>>>> I am posting from Ubuntu 64 bit. Why do you think one needs to

 

>>>>>>> choose

 

>>>>>>> when one can use both?

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>>

 

>>>>>> In other words, when you get caught out you sneak away and crank up

 

>>>>>> the " noiseless patient Spider" and post again?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>> No. Caught? I'm posting from XP right now. So fucking what?

 

>>>>>

 

>>>>

 

>>>> You seem singularly inapt at understanding English. I pointed out that

 

>>>> you sing the phrases of Ubuntu and condemn Windows and then you use

 

>>>> Windows to post to the same news group where you have condemned it -

 

>>>> rather like the priest stupping the alter boys and preaching the

 

>>>> virtues of chastity on Sunday.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> As I said, a hypocrite.

 

>>>>

 

>>>> John B. Slocomb

 

>>>> (johnbslocombatgmaildotcom)

 

>>>

 

>>> Wrong. I use both and have always advocated using both so one can have

 

>>> the best of both worlds. I did take exception with Vista and Me but

 

>>> who didn't?

 

>>

 

>> "Smart people use Linux. Dummies use Windows." - Alias, Feb. 2010

 

>

 

> Using Linux is smarter for surfing the web. Try to keep things in context.

 

> Of course, doing that would ruin your "point". Like I have said many

 

> times, Windows for some things, Linux for others.

 

>

 

 

 

"Windows for when you want things to work, Linux when you want to work for

 

things"

 

----old proverb, author unknown, possibly Death

 

 

 

--

 

Vita brevis breviter in brevi finietur,

 

Mors venit velociter quae neminem veretur.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...