Error message 80070490

[Guest jsadler]

I found this on Google! Problem solved!!!

 

 

 

"Gleeman" wrote:

 

 

>

 

>

 

> "Engel" wrote:

 

>

 

> > Hello Jake,

 

> >

 

> > 80070490

 

> > http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=80070490&qt_s=Search

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rls=SUNA%2CSUNA%3A2007-17%2CSUNA%3Aen&q=80070490&btnG=Search&meta=

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=80070490&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q=80070490&btnG=Buscar+con+Google&meta=

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > 0x80070490

 

> > http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=0x80070490+&qt_s=Search+Groups

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&rls=SUNA%2CSUNA%3A2007-17%2CSUNA%3Aen&q=0x80070490&btnG=Search&meta=

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=0x80070490&btnG=Search&meta=

 

> >

 

> > http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q=0x80070490&btnG=Buscar&meta=

 

> >

 

> > Good luck

 

> > --

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > "Jake" wrote:

 

> >

 

> > > I'm getting the "Windows could not search for new updates" and

 

> > > returned error code 80070490 in the window. I've tried restoring to a

 

> > > previously-successful 'windows update' restore point but the problem

 

> > > persists. There doesn't appear to be any reference in the Microsoft Knowledge

 

> > > Base to this particular error code. Any ideas on the problem and how to

 

> > > resolve it? Thanks.

 

> > >

 

> > > Ian

 

> > >

 

> > >

 

>

 

> Or he could try:

 

> http://www.google.se/search?hl=sv&q=windows+update+error+code+80070490&meta=&btnG=Google-s%C3%B6kning

 

> Where this post is currently rank two.

 

>

 

> Here's a newsflash to all you help people by telling them to look things up

 

> on google-newbies. The posts you reply to may very well end up getting

 

> indexed by google. I suppose you don't realize what this means... it means

 

> that I get stuck in google loops every time I try to sort out an error

 

> because cluless chap x tells person b to look something up on google. Stop

 

> doing it right now. You're the ones causing a problem for thousands of

 

> people. Having multiple threads all over the webb resolving the same problem

 

> would not be an issue. Having multiple unresolved threads pointing to

 

> multiple unresolved threads now there's the bitch.