Guest Nig Posted March 5, 2010 Posted March 5, 2010 Whilst I appreciate your reply Stan, it is somewhat akin to gloating that you are superior. Whilst I am sure that you are more than able to argue your point to the Nth degree, there are I am sure many others who would disagree. I do not really have a point of view. What I have, I have to deal with, it is too late to start wishing I had different equipment. I have a problem, I have asked for advice. There is little point arguing whether 64 bit is worse than 32 bit as is the AMD Intel argument. The best advice you give is to wait until someone with knowledge of the problem suggests a solution. Nig "Stan Starinski" wrote in message news:#5woM#zrKHA.1796@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Wait for responses but Just FYI: > I only use Intel. > I only use genuine Windows or UNIX for networked labs. > And I only use prevalent 32-bit client version for normal, "mass-market" > softwares" such as Office, productivity, communications, etc. > I use 64-bit only for hard-core floating point intensive softwares such as > CAD, Image & Video editing, engineering simulations. > > Basically you invite problems by violating all above. Don't use AMD, > don't flirt with 64 bit UNLESS you know 100% your printer driver was > TESTED to work in 64-bit Windows. > > No wmy suggestion is goback to printer mfg's website and check if 64-bit > driver update is available, and replace yours if available. > > If not, wait for more responses. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.