"~BD~" wrote in message

 

news:89CdnW2nXqgrBT_WnZ2dnUVZ8sCdnZ2d@bt.com...

 

 

> IMO one needs only one 'good' restore point.

 

 

 

Sure, just as one only needs one good backup or disk image. When you

 

*do* need one, your chances of having one-in-five are better than your

 

chances of having one-in-one.

Please don't feed the trolls, especially that troll.

 

 

 

FromTheRafters wrote:

 

> "~BD~" wrote in message

 

> news:89CdnW2nXqgrBT_WnZ2dnUVZ8sCdnZ2d@bt.com...

 

>

 

>> IMO one needs only one 'good' restore point.

 

>

 

> Sure, just as one only needs one good backup or disk image. When you

 

> *do* need one, your chances of having one-in-five are better than your

 

> chances of having one-in-one.

Peter Foldes wrote:

 

> David

 

>

 

> Last time I help you out David. NIS contains NAV the Anti Virus from

 

> Symantec. Think before sending signal to finger.

 

>

 

 

 

I know full well that NIS incorporates NAV. I still have the boxed

 

software I purchased which first detected the malware being spewed by a

 

poster on Annexcafe U2U (uk).

 

 

 

*You*, dear Peter, recommended that Meg should uninstall NIS, which she

 

purchased in January and, instead, install a free programme.

 

 

 

How logical is that?

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

Extremely logical when it comes to Norton David.

 

 

 

--

 

Peter

 

 

 

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others

 

Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

 

 

 

"~BD~" wrote in message

 

news:VeWdnUMQdN8XOz_WnZ2dnUVZ8vSdnZ2d@bt.com...

 

> Peter Foldes wrote:

 

>> David

 

>>

 

>> Last time I help you out David. NIS contains NAV the Anti Virus from

 

>> Symantec. Think before sending signal to finger.

 

>>

 

>

 

> I know full well that NIS incorporates NAV. I still have the boxed software I

 

> purchased which first detected the malware being spewed by a poster on Annexcafe

 

> U2U (uk).

 

>

 

> *You*, dear Peter, recommended that Meg should uninstall NIS, which she purchased

 

> in January and, instead, install a free programme.

 

>

 

> How logical is that?

 

>

 

> --

 

> Dave

Meg wrote:

 

> Hi PA Bear,

 

>

 

> I sure will. I'll also scan compressed files periodically

 

> to check for malware overnight, since it takes 6 hours.

 

> Thank you for following up for me.

 

>

 

> Meg

 

 

 

 

 

Meg

 

 

 

Please ask PA Bear exactly why *I* am so special.

 

 

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

Peter Foldes wrote:

 

> Extremely logical when it comes to Norton David.

 

>

 

 

 

Please quantify your statement.

 

 

 

MVP '...winston' has stated that he uses NIS 2010

 

 

 

Are you inferring that you know better than an MVP?

 

 

 

--

 

Dave - reputations take years to achieve, yet can be destroyed in moments!

From: "Peter Foldes"

 

 

 

| Extremely logical when it comes to Norton David.

 

 

 

Y E S !

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

 

http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html

 

Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

"~BD~" wrote in message

 

news:f56dnZ37S9RnNj_WnZ2dnUVZ7sadnZ2d@bt.com...

 

 

> Are you inferring that you know better than an MVP?

 

 

 

You do the inferring, he does the implying.

 

 

 

....and just because somebody uses something, doesn't necessarily mean he

 

would (or should) recommend it to Meg. :o)

David H. Lipman wrote:

 

> From: "Peter Foldes"

 

>

 

> | Extremely logical when it comes to Norton David.

 

>

 

> Y E S !

 

>

 

Path:

 

border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.freenet.de!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!aioe.org!not-for-mail

 

From: "Peter Foldes"

 

Newsgroups: free.uk.criminals.name.and.shame

 

Subject: BD the Troll

 

Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:16:19 -0400

 

Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server

 

Lines: 11

 

Message-ID:

 

NNTP-Posting-Host: wdBKXUNC377BfgQYktENLA.user.speranza.aioe.org

 

Mime-Version: 1.0

 

Content-Type: text/plain

 

format=flowed

 

charset="iso-8859-1"

 

reply-type=original

 

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

 

X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org

 

X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4325

 

X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2

 

X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.4548

 

X-Priority: 3

 

X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

 

Bytes: 1564

 

Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com free.uk.criminals.name.and.shame:281

 

 

 

You are so stupid that you do not know it yourself. Winston and I speak

 

often since

 

we are friends. I use Norton AV which costs more than you PC and you

 

have no idea

 

what Norton is. Norton for the Enterprise is excellent while the version

 

(NAV) is

 

not. You just showed up yourself as a real Troll with that post you did.

 

We are all

 

having a good laugh at you right now. You are an idiot and we are

 

starting to

 

realize that you cannot help yourself. Like I said that post confirms

 

that you have

 

a mental disease. Keep it up David and keep burying yourself deeper.

 

Just to tell

 

you that my Power Supply costs more than any of your computers and that

 

includes the

 

Mac .

 

Idiot extraordinaire is what you are .LOL

Thank you Peter.

 

 

 

Meg

 

 

 

 

 

"Peter Foldes" wrote:

 

 

> Meg

 

>

 

> Just FYI read the following applies to 2010 NIS also

 

> http://bertk.mvps.org/html/symantecdoc1.html

 

> --

 

> Peter

 

>

 

> Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others

 

> Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

 

>

 

> "Meg" wrote in message

 

> news:C97AFC2C-A27F-432C-8212-1F3B82B5AD1C@microsoft.com...

 

> > Hi Dave,

 

> >

 

> > I know,

 

> > You are "Dave", and "David", he sign his name as "Dave" as well.

 

> > I was confused. haha.

 

> > Thank you for your thoughts on my issue.

 

> > I 'm not familier with restore point, (I've never done restore)

 

> > But you are right, if my pc have memory(Restore) point

 

> > It could be a lot.

 

> > I'll ask Norton tech what they think about it. and

 

> > I'll post the answer here (on the very bottom of thread)when I

 

> > hear back from them.

 

> > (It usually takes 24-48 hours or so to hear from them)

 

> > Thank you for giving me some tips to reduce my scan time.

 

> > I appreciate it.

 

> >

 

> > Meg

 

> >

 

> >

 

> >

 

> > "~BD~" wrote:

 

> >

 

> >> Meg wrote:

 

> >> > Hi David,

 

> >> >

 

> >> > Thank you for replying to my question.

 

> >> > Now I understand, how you normally divide the scan by

 

> >> > right clicking the files to choose.

 

> >> > I looked at my NIS 2010, and I think they have section to

 

> >> > look up the list as well.

 

> >> > I'm still not familier with 2010 version since I have this fairly

 

> >> > short time (since January).

 

> >> > When I get a chance I will contact Norton asking

 

> >> > where to look up on my NIS 2010.

 

> >> > I apprecite you taking the time to answer my question

 

> >> > Thank you.

 

> >> >

 

> >> > Meg

 

> >>

 

> >>

 

> >> You have done well, Meg! This is the other Dave replying btw! :)

 

> >>

 

> >> Maybe you noticed the post I made to '...winston' which he chose to

 

> >> ignore. I said ....

 

> >>

 

> >> "Will a scan check files/folders for each and every restore point? If

 

> >> so, assuming Meg's computer is running well in all other regards, might

 

> >> it be an idea to delete all current restore points (then reapply) and

 

> >> see if that improves matters for her?

 

> >>

 

> >> Ref: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310405

 

> >>

 

> >> Just a thought!"

 

> >>

 

> >> **

 

> >>

 

> >> Maybe if *you* ask him, or one of the other gurus who have commented,

 

> >> you will determine the answer.

 

> >>

 

> >> I personally feel that it *will* make a big difference, but then I'm

 

> >> simply a user like you!

 

> >>

 

> >> --

 

> >> Dave

 

> >> .

 

> >>

 

>

 

> .

 

>

Hi David,

 

 

 

Thank you for your mesage.

 

OK, I understand. I wouldn't do anything I'm not sure of.

 

I make sure I'll follow an advice I hear back from Norton.

 

 

 

Meg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"David H. Lipman" wrote:

 

 

> From: "Meg"

 

>

 

> | Hi Dave,

 

>

 

> | I know,

 

> | You are "Dave", and "David", he sign his name as "Dave" as well.

 

> | I was confused. haha.

 

> | Thank you for your thoughts on my issue.

 

> | I 'm not familier with restore point, (I've never done restore)

 

> | But you are right, if my pc have memory(Restore) point

 

> | It could be a lot.

 

> | I'll ask Norton tech what they think about it. and

 

> | I'll post the answer here (on the very bottom of thread)when I

 

> | hear back from them.

 

> | (It usually takes 24-48 hours or so to hear from them)

 

> | Thank you for giving me some tips to reduce my scan time.

 

> | I appreciate it.

 

>

 

> | Meg

 

>

 

> Meg:

 

>

 

> Do NOT remove System Restore cache restore points. If you do, you will not have a fall

 

> back position if something goes wrong.

 

>

 

> This would be a WRONG approach.

 

>

 

>

 

> --

 

> Dave

 

> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html

 

> Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

 

>

 

>

 

> .

 

>

Hi Dave,

 

 

 

Are you OK?

 

I like the first ~BD~ better in this post,

 

than the one I see now.. (Although I don't know you well)

 

I know it sucks when people challenge you.

 

Perhaps you have more talent in other area than pc?

 

Have some green tea (or beer?) and relax... OK? :)

 

Take care.

 

 

 

Meg

 

 

 

"~BD~" wrote:

 

 

> Meg wrote:

 

> > Hi PA Bear,

 

> >

 

> > I sure will. I'll also scan compressed files periodically

 

> > to check for malware overnight, since it takes 6 hours.

 

> > Thank you for following up for me.

 

> >

 

> > Meg

 

>

 

>

 

> Meg

 

>

 

> Please ask PA Bear exactly why *I* am so special.

 

>

 

> Thank you.

 

>

 

> --

 

> Dave

 

> .

 

>

+1

 

 

 

Come guys, don't waste your time, just create a ~BD~ troll filter/killfile.

 

 

 

"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote in message

 

news:%23m$kqiuxKHA.4492@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

 

> Please don't feed the trolls, especially that troll.

 

>

 

> FromTheRafters wrote:

 

>> "~BD~" wrote in message

 

>> news:89CdnW2nXqgrBT_WnZ2dnUVZ8sCdnZ2d@bt.com...

 

>>

 

>>> IMO one needs only one 'good' restore point.

 

>>

 

>> Sure, just as one only needs one good backup or disk image. When you

 

>> *do* need one, your chances of having one-in-five are better than your

 

>> chances of having one-in-one.

Hi Dave,

 

 

 

I just heard back from Norton, and You were right.

 

They said "Yes" to your idea :)

 

Below is a copy of their reply.

 

Thank you for giving me a tip. I think I might try this.

 

Meg

 

 

 

If you delete the System restore points, it will increase your scan speed.

 

Please follow the steps given below to delete the system restore points.

 

1. Click Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > Click Disc

 

Cleanup

 

 

 

2. Now launch this utility and click More Options tab. Under which click

 

System Restore and followed by that click Clean Up tab a message will popup

 

-Are you sure you want to delete all but the most recent restore point?Click

 

Yes then OK.

 

 

 

3. Finally another message will popup-Are you sure you want to perform

 

these actions?Click Yes.

 

 

 

Now, all the System Restore points except the most recent one are cleaned.

 

As a result there will be more free space in hard disk.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Meg" wrote:

 

 

> Hi,

 

>

 

> I have NIS 2010, Win XP.

 

> To scan 320,500 files (full system scan),

 

> It took 3 hours about a month ago. but now

 

> for the less amount of files (282,402 files), it took 6 hours to scan today.

 

> I'm not sure what is going on.

 

> I'm not familier with files in general, but

 

> I did delete a lot of music, videos, pictures and

 

> some of my "favorites" from my pc since last month

 

> to reduce the files, but noe it's double the time. this is strange.

 

> I've never done anything to my files since I'm not familier with them.

 

> Could someone tell me a tip to reduce scan time?

 

> Thank you.

 

>

 

> Meg

 

>

 

>

Hi,

 

 

 

I'm sorry but I can't read some threads from half way down

 

(the screen is blank) so if any of you write to me,

 

I'm afraid I can't read it anymore. (including my own)

 

Thank you for your message anyway.

 

Take care.

 

 

 

Meg

 

 

 

"Meg" wrote:

 

 

> Hi,

 

>

 

> I have NIS 2010, Win XP.

 

> To scan 320,500 files (full system scan),

 

> It took 3 hours about a month ago. but now

 

> for the less amount of files (282,402 files), it took 6 hours to scan today.

 

> I'm not sure what is going on.

 

> I'm not familier with files in general, but

 

> I did delete a lot of music, videos, pictures and

 

> some of my "favorites" from my pc since last month

 

> to reduce the files, but noe it's double the time. this is strange.

 

> I've never done anything to my files since I'm not familier with them.

 

> Could someone tell me a tip to reduce scan time?

 

> Thank you.

 

>

 

> Meg

 

>

 

>

Meg wrote:

 

> Hi,

 

>

 

> I'm sorry but I can't read some threads from half way down

 

> (the screen is blank) so if any of you write to me,

 

> I'm afraid I can't read it anymore. (including my own)

 

> Thank you for your message anyway.

 

> Take care.

 

>

 

> Meg

 

 

 

 

 

A rather strange message from Meg. I trust she is OK.

 

 

 

I'll look out for her safe return. :)

 

 

 

--

 

Dave - Good to know that Symantec agreed with *me*!

Meg wrote:

 

> Hi Dave,

 

 

 

Hi! :)

 

 

> Are you OK?

 

 

 

Yes. Thank you for asking, Meg - I'm fine. :)

 

 

> I like the first ~BD~ better in this post,

 

> than the one I see now.. (Although I don't know you well)

 

 

 

I didn't mean my irritation to shine through. I apologise.

 

 

> I know it sucks when people challenge you.

 

 

 

You are 180 degrees out, Meg. I'm just a 'user' like you and it is me

 

who has challenged 'the establishment' - they don't like that. )

 

 

> Perhaps you have more talent in other area than pc?

 

 

 

I'm a very keen narrowboater. If you have no idea about same, take a

 

look here: http://www.waterscape.com and explore the site. I have my own 60ft

 

boat. Computing is my _winter_ interest!

 

 

> Have some green tea (or beer?) and relax... OK? :)

 

 

 

Strange you should say that. I stopped drinking coffee (maybe 8 mugs a

 

day!) about 10 days ago and switched to green tea instead. I suspect I'm

 

suffering withdrawal symptoms from both caffeine *and* sugar!

 

 

> Take care.

 

 

 

I will. You too. :)

 

 

> Meg

 

 

 

--

 

Dave (BD)

 

>> From: "Peter Foldes"

 

>

 

> You are so stupid that you do not know it yourself.

 

 

 

That statement is false.

 

 

> Winston and I speak often since we are friends.

 

 

 

That does not surprise me.

 

 

> I use Norton AV which costs more than you PC and you have no idea

 

> what Norton is.

 

 

 

Sometimes one has to ask for help, so I 'borrowed' an

 

Enterprise version of Norton to test it.

 

 

> Norton for the Enterprise is excellent while the version (NAV) is not.

 

 

 

Many commentators say that.

 

 

 

Your friend Andrew Taylor uses Norton 360 I believe (at least, he did)

 

but not once did I see/hear you recommend that he use something else.

 

 

> You just showed up yourself as a real Troll with that post you did.

 

 

 

I simply wanted to give *you* the opportunity to show yourself up for

 

the person you really are. Thank you for so doing!

 

 

> We are all having a good laugh at you right now.

 

 

 

There's that *WE* again.

 

 

> You are an idiot and we are starting to realize that you cannot help yourself.

 

> Like I said that post confirms that you have a mental disease.

 

> Keep it up David and keep burying yourself deeper.

 

 

 

There's that 'we' *again*.

 

 

 

Exactly who *are* 'we'? The rest of your team? Good guys or *bad* guys?

 

 

> Just to tell you that my Power Supply costs more than any of your

 

> computers and that includes the Mac.

 

 

 

That would tie in with you having a very expensive and fast Internet

 

connection (still a T3?). I'm not quite sure why it is relevant here.

 

 

> Idiot extraordinaire is what you are .LOL

 

 

 

You are entitled to your opinion.

 

 

 

My use of Norton AV is what prompted my exclusion from Aumha, which as

 

you well know, is the *real* 'home' of PA Bear (aka Robear Dyer). I

 

found that 'interesting', especially as subsequently he lied (saying

 

that I had been banned by an ISP, when this is false) and then he

 

refuses to communicate further. Such behaviour is irrational!

 

 

 

When one goes to http://aumha.net/ there is an unusual Favicon shown for

 

the URL in the address bar. Tell me, what does that symbol represent?

 

Anyone?

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

From: "Meg"

 

 

 

| Hi Dave,

 

 

 

| I just heard back from Norton, and You were right.

 

| They said "Yes" to your idea :)

 

| Below is a copy of their reply.

 

| Thank you for giving me a tip. I think I might try this.

 

| Meg

 

 

 

| If you delete the System restore points, it will increase your scan speed.

 

| Please follow the steps given below to delete the system restore points.

 

| 1. Click Start > All Programs > Accessories > System Tools > Click Disc

 

| Cleanup

 

 

 

| 2. Now launch this utility and click More Options tab. Under which click

 

| System Restore and followed by that click Clean Up tab a message will popup

 

| -Are you sure you want to delete all but the most recent restore point?Click

 

| Yes then OK.

 

 

 

| 3. Finally another message will popup-Are you sure you want to perform

 

| these actions?Click Yes.

 

 

 

| Now, all the System Restore points except the most recent one are cleaned.

 

| As a result there will be more free space in hard disk.

 

 

 

 

 

/* Still a BAD idea */

 

 

 

If you want more disk space then DECREASE the size of the System Restore Cache. Snmaller

 

cache, less Restore Points in total, shorter scan time.

 

 

 

The objective is not a speed race when scanning the system.

 

 

 

If you followed my advice of right-clicking on folders such as "c:\documents and

 

settings\" and "c:\windows\" the System Restore cache would be by passed when performing

 

an "On Demand" scan!

 

 

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

 

http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html

 

Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

David H. Lipman wrote:

 

> From: "Meg"

 

>

 

> | Hi Dave,

 

>

 

> | I just heard back from Norton, and You were right.

 

> | They said "Yes" to your idea :)

 

> | Below is a copy of their reply.

 

> | Thank you for giving me a tip. I think I might try this.

 

> | Meg

 

>

 

> | If you delete the System restore points, it will increase your scan speed.

 

> | Please follow the steps given below to delete the system restore points.

 

> | 1. Click Start> All Programs> Accessories> System Tools> Click Disc

 

> | Cleanup

 

>

 

> | 2. Now launch this utility and click More Options tab. Under which click

 

> | System Restore and followed by that click Clean Up tab a message will popup

 

> | -Are you sure you want to delete all but the most recent restore point?Click

 

> | Yes then OK.

 

>

 

> | 3. Finally another message will popup-Are you sure you want to perform

 

> | these actions?Click Yes.

 

>

 

> | Now, all the System Restore points except the most recent one are cleaned.

 

> | As a result there will be more free space in hard disk.

 

>

 

>

 

> /* Still a BAD idea */

 

>

 

> If you want more disk space then DECREASE the size of the System Restore Cache. Snmaller

 

> cache, less Restore Points in total, shorter scan time.

 

>

 

> The objective is not a speed race when scanning the system.

 

>

 

> If you followed my advice of right-clicking on folders such as "c:\documents and

 

> settings\" and "c:\windows\" the System Restore cache would be by passed when performing

 

> an "On Demand" scan!

 

>

 

>

 

 

 

David, you are *well* aware that malware can (and does) reside in the

 

System Restore Cache ready, and able, to pop back and re-infect a

 

machine all over again - whenever it so chooses (or is prompted so to do

 

by outside agencies).

 

 

 

In my opinion, and as agreed by Norton, I cannot see *any* reason for

 

not resetting the Restore facility from time to time.

 

 

 

I'm sure Meg would find it helpful if you were to explain *why* you

 

think it is a *BAD* idea. Will you do that?

 

 

 

**

 

 

 

Whilst I here, on a separate point, on your website here

 

http://uploadmalware.com/vendors.php you say ....

 

 

 

"If you do not work in the anti-malware industry or are a well known

 

security expert access will not be given."

 

 

 

Why, please, will you not permit "well known security experts"?

 

 

 

That hints at a suggestion that they might discover something you'd

 

rather they not find, doesn't it? Just seems odd to me. One might have

 

thought good guys would welcome help from experts! )

 

 

 

--

 

Dave - have a great day!

~BD~ forgot to ask ....

 

 

 

I've no doubt got things wrong again, but David's IP address IP

 

Information -

 

 

 

IP address: 75.125.82.136

 

Reverse DNS: silver.dnsstuff.com.

 

Reverse DNS authenticity: [Verified]

 

ASN: 21844

 

ASN Name: THEPLANET-AS

 

IP range connectivity: 1

 

Registrar (per ASN): ARIN

 

Country (per IP registrar): US [united States]

 

Country Currency: USD [united States Dollars]

 

Country IP Range: 75.124.0.0 to 75.125.255.255

 

Country fraud profile: Normal

 

City (per outside source): Dallas, Texas

 

Country (per outside source): US [united States]

 

Private (internal) IP? No

 

IP address registrar: whois.arin.net

 

Known Proxy? No

 

Link for WHOIS: 75.125.82.136

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Indicates that it must have been *very* early in the morning when he

 

posted his reply to Meg. Just wondering if he'd share what his normal

 

hours of work are - or is he part of a team working 24/7?

 

 

 

Always curious!

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

Peter Foldes wrote:

 

> You crossposting idiot what was the reason you crossposted it to another

 

> group needlessly.

 

 

 

Maybe you have misplaced your spectacles, so I'll repeat what I said

 

before:-

 

 

 

"I have added another group so that you may have access to a wider range

 

of expertise. I am *not* a computer guru, just a user like you!"

 

 

 

Other folk may consider that your recommendation to remove a paid-for

 

product, which is successfully used by tens of thousands of people

 

around the world, a somewhat foolish course of action.

 

 

 

You have referred to '...winston' as your friend - yet you seem not to

 

have dissuaded *him* from using NIS. He's now an MVP. Surely an MVP

 

wouldn't use a sub-standard product, would they?

 

 

 

I think you may have another, secret, agenda, Mr Foldes.

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

~BD~ wrote:

 

> ~BD~ forgot to ask ....

 

>

 

> I've no doubt got things wrong again, but David's IP address IP

 

> Information -

 

 

 

Ooops! I copied the wrong info!

 

 

 

I had a notion that I'd made a mistake. Sorry!

 

 

 

 

 

IP Information - 173.70.123.19

 

 

 

IP address: 173.70.123.19

 

Reverse DNS: pool-173-70-123-19.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net.

 

Reverse DNS authenticity: [Verified]

 

ASN: 19262

 

ASN Name: VZGNI-TRANSIT

 

IP range connectivity: 1

 

Registrar (per ASN): ARIN

 

Country (per IP registrar): US [united States]

 

Country Currency: USD [united States Dollars]

 

Country IP Range: 173.64.0.0 to 173.127.255.255

 

Country fraud profile: Normal

 

City (per outside source): Milton, Wisconsin

 

Country (per outside source): US [united States]

 

Private (internal) IP? No

 

IP address registrar: whois.arin.net

 

Known Proxy? No

 

Link for WHOIS: 173.70.123.19

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It makes no real difference though!

 

 

 

It must still have been *very* early in the morning when David Lipman

 

posted his reply to Meg.

 

 

 

--

 

Dave

Tom Willett wrote:

 

> Raving lunatic.

 

 

 

Which information on the site do you dispute?

 

 

 

http://www.symantec.com/norton/products/charts/competitive.jsp

 

 

 

No one likes a sluggish computer. So we designed the Norton products to

 

be fast and light so they will not slow you down or get on your way.

 

 

 

60% Better Overall Performance

 

How do you measure performance? Passmark Software found 16 different

 

ways. Combine the results and Norton Internet Security performed better

 

than any other security suite tested.*

 

 

 

Fastest Scan Speeds

 

Norton 360 version 4.0 scanned 37% faster, Norton Internet Security 2010

 

scanned 30% faster and Norton Antivirus 2010 scanned 26% faster than

 

their closest competitors.*

 

 

 

68% Less Memory

 

Norton 360 version 4 uses less memory than any of its competitors – and

 

a whopping 68% less memory that the competitive average for total

 

protection solutions.*

 

 

 

14 Times More Frequent Updates

 

 

 

Norton streams the most frequent updates to your desktop – providing

 

protection from the latest threats about 270 times a day or nearly 14

 

times more often that its closest competitor.****

 

Get a 41% Boost In Boot Time

 

 

 

Norton 360 version 4 startup manager optimization boosts boot time by up

 

to 41%.*

 

 

 

--

 

Dave - sounds impressive to me! (I'm using MSE now)

Please don't feed the trolls, especially that troll.

 

 

 

Meg wrote:

 

> Hi Dave,

 

>

 

> Are you OK?

 

> I like the first ~BD~ better in this post,

 

> than the one I see now.. (Although I don't know you well)

 

> I know it sucks when people challenge you.

 

> Perhaps you have more talent in other area than pc?

 

> Have some green tea (or beer?) and relax... OK? :)

 

> Take care.

 

>

 

> Meg

 

>

 

> "~BD~" wrote:

 

>

 

>> Meg wrote:

 

>>> Hi PA Bear,

 

>>>

 

>>> I sure will. I'll also scan compressed files periodically

 

>>> to check for malware overnight, since it takes 6 hours.

 

>>> Thank you for following up for me.

 

>>>

 

>>> Meg

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Meg

 

>>

 

>> Please ask PA Bear exactly why *I* am so special.

 

>>

 

>> Thank you.

 

>>

 

>> --

 

>> Dave

 

>> .