Posted August 27, 200915 yr One word: Wait for Windows7, it takes full advantage of SSD's. But who told you SSD is faster? Nothing beats a magnetic harddisk, even today, for a regular home user. In a lab, science or industrial applications there're faster methods of storing information, but for an average person harddisk is the best large-volume/daily access medium except for its mechanical fragility/wearing out & sensitivity to Magnetic fields. Also extremely large harddisks already today enter the domain of Quantum Mechanics where reliability of storing a Logic 0 or 1 is described by Theory of Probablity. In plain English, very large harddisks might be unreliable unless you pay extra for Redundancy (hard or software-level erroro correction circuits & codes). My preference for ultraimportant information is to be backed up to Optical media, made by companies like Verbatim, 3M or HP, not by junk like Memorex. I make 3 folders - 3 identical copies spread over DVDR or BD (BlueRay) disk in case surface getrs scratched, then I copy a 4th image to a portable harddisk stored 60 miles away from home. Plus I upload the same to a server 2000 miles away. Because my data is my life. I still can peek at naive letters I wrote in college 9 years ago, and my high school rubbish, it makes me blush. But often it terrifies me - some pieces are extremely witty, I was a smart guy. It means i got dumber, if I get impressed by it 17 years later, i am 37 now. Things I wrote at 20 are still oin disks. SSD is the same as a USB flashdrive, except of giant size and faster on-board controller which emulates harddisk cylinder structure. OK? That means it's subject to wearing off logical cells, and SLOW sequential access. If you're reading a giant single file, harddisk is FASTER, its head spinning for example at 10,000 rpm will pump data way way faster than any SSD can, and if you find an SSD which can compare to harddisk it probably costs more than imaged in a vile alcohol-induced dream. Where SSD beats harddisk is accessing numerous small files because SSD's random access is nearly linear versus Address it's accessing. But harddisk needs ot constantly move read/write head to random sectors on diks platter to access such fragmented files. So.. you can never say SSD or HDD is faster, it depends. If we had this conversation just a year ago, I'd faltly say SSD is too crippled for professional use, well now it's not too bad for many small files, but still - watching a video or pumping CAD data which I do daily as an Engineer, nothing can beat harddisk even today.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.