Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

  • Replies 113
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Hey, short cu*t

How you doing Chicken Little.

About time I get right up your nose!

 

You spoof me all the time, you parasite.

You're "The Bored Spoofer"

I'm waiting for you, and so are the others.

You have nowhere to hide.

--

---

Leonard Grey

Errare Humanum Est

 

 

 

"Paul Montgomery" wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:32:44 -0400, "Mr. Arnold"

> wrote:

>

> >You remind me of the nut-job Bart in an AV NG that did the same thing

> >when I opened his nose several years ago.

> >

> >The young lad chased me all over the place. I don't know what happened

> >to the young lad. He just disappeared and was never seen again. You're

> >not that young. :-P

>

> Unlike Bart, I'm not going away. I may be old - wish me Happy

> Birthday: I turn 65 Friday! - but I've still got good strong legs and

> more will power than you'd like me to have.

>

Hey, short cu*t

How you doing Chicken Little.

About time I get right up your nose!

 

You spoof me all the time, you parasite.

You're "The Bored Spoofer"

I'm waiting for you, and so are the others.

You have nowhere to hide.

--

---

Leonard Grey

Errare Humanum Est

 

 

 

"Paul Montgomery" wrote:

> Paul Montgomery wrote:

> >

> >

> > Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

> >

> > Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> > personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> > X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> > X$x" "in X$#" "is

> > a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> > like X$#" "X#$"

> > "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> > PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> > wherever he goes!" "X#$

> >

> > As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> > thus illegal

> >

> > Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

> >

> > ------------------------------

> >

> > Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

> >

> > They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> > not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> > their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> > average reader would not be able to detect.

> >

> > At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> > troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> > over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> > troll.

> >

> > Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> > the seriousness of this offence.

> >

> > Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> > to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> > The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> > being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> > also worth registering with

> > http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

> >

> >

>

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

I can figure out the real one!

That moron does make it hard to do!

--

---

Leonard Grey

Errare Humanum Est

 

 

 

"Paul Montgomery" wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:54:00 -0700, Mr. Arnold

> wrote:

>

> >These are some of my Spoofs, and Aliases

>

> You are TOO modest. Here's the combined list from the Vista groups

> and the Linux.advocacy group (I think you held those back) for July to

> the present.

>

> Anti on Chicken Little(s)

> Anti on Linux Sinister Chicken Littles

> Brown Nosing Linonut

> Chicken Little Albright

> Chris Ahlstrom

> chrisv1

> COLA Fish and Game

> COLA People Controller

> COLA Sucks

> COLO Loons

> Confused Donkey

> Dan S-illy aka Barney Phife

> Doctor Bee

> General Paul Montgomery

> General Paul Montgomery1

> General Paul Montgomery2

> General Paul Montgomery3

> General Paul Montgomery4

> General Paul Montgomery5

> General Paul Montgomery6

> General Paul Montgomery7

> Hunting for JackA$$

> Identity

> Junk Yard Dog

> Kotex Queen Clear Windows

> Linonut

> Linux Sucks

> Little Mad Dog

> Mick Murphy

> Montgumdrop

> MontGumDropped1 Paul

> Mr. Arnold

> Paul MontDenturesDropped

> Paul Montgomery

> Paul Montgomery 9000

> Paul Montgumdrop

> Pauly

> Ringmonster

> Roy S. Schestowitz

> Savwafare with Flare

> Sudden Impact

> Tall Tales Albright

> The Bee

> The Big Ticket

> The Hornet

> The Lone Ranger

> The Lone Ranger1

> The Lone Ranger2

> Triple X Killer

> Van Helsing the Albright Hunter

>

Leonard Grey wrote:

 

You lied. You can't be trusted. You word is not good. :-P

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...