Jump to content

Guest, which answer was the most helpful?

If any of these replies answered your question, please take a moment to click the 'Mark as solution' button on the post with the best answer.
Marking posts as the solution will help other community members find answers to their questions quickly. Thank you for your help!

Featured Replies

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

  • Replies 113
  • Views 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Mr. Arnold wrote:

>

> "Paul MontDenturesDropped" wrote:

>

>> Mr. Arnold wrote:

>>

>>

>>

>> You should fall for the impersonator act.

>

> I am so glad you AGREE!

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Paul Montgomery wrote:

>

>

> Subject: 4.5 Personal attacks on individuals and groups.

>

> Selected individuals are subjected to quite vicious

> personal attacks throughout usenet. Examples are: "X#$

> X#$!" "is a X$#" "is a X$#!" "is a

> X$x" "in X$#" "is

> a X$X" "is a X#$" "is a V$X just

> like X$#" "X#$"

> "Sexually harassed by" "X#$" "X#$

> PARTY" "X$#" "hated

> wherever he goes!" "X#$

>

> As will be seen several of these are libelous, and

> thus illegal

>

> Groups such as the regular posters are attacked similarly,

>

> ------------------------------

>

> Subject: 4.6 Forgeries

>

> They regularly forge the identities of posters who they do

> not like. This can vary from badly spelled versions of

> their name and/or email address, to forgeries which the

> average reader would not be able to detect.

>

> At times this can reach a bizarre condition where they

> troll using a forged identity at a Breidbart Index of well

> over 20. They then at every opportunity call the victim a

> troll.

>

> Larting the offender is often effective because ISPs recognise

> the seriousness of this offence.

>

> Where Forgery is done via an anonymous remailer complaints

> to abuse@thelastremailerinthechain may well be effective.

> The remailers administrators do not like their facilities

> being misused, and have ways of combatting this. It is

> also worth registering with

> http://www.paracrypt.com/remailerabuse/

>

>

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...