Actually, I'd onsider it a feature and not a bug. Why, you ask?
Because if you drag files around an explorer view (of into a view from
another folder), it implies that you want to customize the arrangement
of the view because you will be inserting files where you droppped them
onto the list.
I find this to be extremely helpful, because I download a lot of
photography on a daily basis. Before I start my downloads, I open the
folder where I want to save the picture and "turn off" sorting by
changing the position of the last item in the list. Then, when I
drag-and-drop a picture from Internet Explorer, it appears where I want
it - at the end of the list where I dropped it. This makes it easier to
see which ones I've already downloaded.
Once I am done, I can easily select the last items in the list, and
apply the appropriate tags to the new files. When that is done, I
re-initiate sorting.
It works slightly differently in XP, but the principle remains the
same. The difference in XP is you could move the icons to just about any
arrangement you wanted, and this created problems for many users.
In Vista, when you re-arrange files in a view, Explorer will keep all
the files in a single consecutive area at the top of the view to prevent
a file icon from being hidden out of view. This happens whether you in
Details, Tiles or any other view style of Explorer.
Raybo729905 Wrote:
> It's sad that no one has responded to this question. Some one some where
> knows the answer but doesn't want to help...
>
> I personally think this is a bug and not a feature.
>
> "Raybo" wrote:
> > > >
> > > In details view of files, you can drag a file up or down the list,
> > and
> > > explorer deselects sorts and you get an unsorted list.
> > >
> > > This feature is very annoying, as right button dragging to a folder
> > and
> > > selecting move will also deselect sorts as well. This is something I
> > do all
> > > day long, and I have to click the name header to re-activate sorts
> > after
> > > every file I move or copy.
> > >
> > > Why does explorer have this unsorted ability?
> > >
> > > Can it be disabled and act like XP?
> > >
> > > This one bug is making the use of Vista a pain in the butt, and the
> > only
> > > reason I'm using Vista is the Dell machine I have can't get Gigabit
> > speed any
> > > network addapter when this machine runs XP. We tried 3 different
> > brands of
> > > Gigabit networks cards, and they only get 100Mb speed on a Gigabit
> > network, > >
--
Dzomlija
Peter Alexander Dzomlija
-Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? And as
you die, so shall I be Reborn...-
_*Prometheus*_
MOBO: ASUS MB-M3A32-MVP Deluxe/WiFi-AP
CPU: AMD Phenom 9600 Quad
RAM: 2 x A-Data 2GB DDR2-800
GPU: ASUS ATI Radeon HD 2400PRO, 256MB
BOX: Thermaltake Tai-Chi Water Cooled
OS: Windows Vista Ultimate x64
'' (
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=333562)'[image:
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/333562.png]'
(
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/333562.png)