Vista 64 bit beta driver issues

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mirey86
  • Start date Start date
M

Mirey86

I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in which
you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
Driver Signature Enforcement'

but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
install the beta drivers?

makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista


--
Mirey86
 
Hi,

Yes, you'll need to do it each time until Nvidia gets the driver signed.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"Mirey86" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
news:b78bb9c354889b8579d385184e01d6e1@nntp-gateway.com...
>
> I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
> Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
> versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
> digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in which
> you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
> Driver Signature Enforcement'
>
> but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
> and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
> time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
> install the beta drivers?
>
> makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista
>
>
> --
> Mirey86
>
>
 
Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
signed drivers or removed from the system.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/


"Mirey86" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
news:b78bb9c354889b8579d385184e01d6e1@nntp-gateway.com...
>
> I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
> Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
> versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
> digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in which
> you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
> Driver Signature Enforcement'
>
> but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
> and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
> time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
> install the beta drivers?
>
> makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista
>
>
> --
> Mirey86
>
>
 
I'm a bit confused here.

I have been using beta Geforce drivers for over a year on Vista Home Premium
X64. I have received warnings on the betas that the source cannot be
verified, but I was able to choose to install the drivers. I believe that
they were signed, although they were not WHQL blessed. The current drivers I
have in place are betas (175.80) that were leaked through the website of an
nVidia partner.

I think I've only seen one driver in the past year that was unsigned, and
that was associated with a utility that may have been a hack.

Apparently beta and unsigned are not equivalent.

Perhaps some MVP can shed light on this. I can't explain the OPs problem I
have not shared it.

Return address scrambled. Replace nkbob with bobkn.

"Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
> Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
> signed drivers or removed from the system.
>
> --
> Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
> * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
> * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/
>
>
> "Mirey86" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
> news:b78bb9c354889b8579d385184e01d6e1@nntp-gateway.com...
>>
>> I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
>> Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
>> versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
>> digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in which
>> you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
>> Driver Signature Enforcement'
>>
>> but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
>> and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
>> time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
>> install the beta drivers?
>>
>> makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mirey86
>>
>>
>
 
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400, "Bob Knowlden" <nkbob@comcast.net>
wrote:

>I'm a bit confused here.
>
>I have been using beta Geforce drivers for over a year on Vista Home Premium
>X64. I have received warnings on the betas that the source cannot be
>verified, but I was able to choose to install the drivers. I believe that
>they were signed, although they were not WHQL blessed. The current drivers I
>have in place are betas (175.80) that were leaked through the website of an
>nVidia partner.
>
>I think I've only seen one driver in the past year that was unsigned, and
>that was associated with a utility that may have been a hack.
>
>Apparently beta and unsigned are not equivalent.

True.

Beta means that the driver isn't at the final release point and is
only for testing. All beta drivers will be unsigned drivers as well.

Unsigned means it's not designed for the operating system in
question... i.e., it doesn't pass all of MS's tests.

Not all unsigned drivers are beta drivers.

>
>Perhaps some MVP can shed light on this. I can't explain the OPs problem I
>have not shared it.
>
>Return address scrambled. Replace nkbob with bobkn.
>
>"Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
>news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
>> signed drivers or removed from the system.
>>
>> --
>> Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
>> * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
>> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
>> * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/
>>
>>
>> "Mirey86" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
>> news:b78bb9c354889b8579d385184e01d6e1@nntp-gateway.com...
>>>
>>> I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
>>> Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
>>> versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
>>> digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in which
>>> you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
>>> Driver Signature Enforcement'
>>>
>>> but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
>>> and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
>>> time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
>>> install the beta drivers?
>>>
>>> makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Mirey86
>>>
>>>
>>
 
I believe that the statement that "All beta drivers will be unsigned drivers
as well" is not true.

Let me be clear that I've tried many beta nVidia drivers in the past year
under Vista X64, and Vista has never refused to load any of them. I have
never needed to suppress the security feature that prevents the use of
unsigned drivers with nVidia beta Geforce drivers. That leads me to believe
that they can't be unsigned.

"Nonny" <nonnymoose@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b3l844h6ke4jgvj718erd9t8a8am3o24fj@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400, "Bob Knowlden" <nkbob@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>>I'm a bit confused here.
>>
>>I have been using beta Geforce drivers for over a year on Vista Home
>>Premium
>>X64. I have received warnings on the betas that the source cannot be
>>verified, but I was able to choose to install the drivers. I believe that
>>they were signed, although they were not WHQL blessed. The current drivers
>>I
>>have in place are betas (175.80) that were leaked through the website of
>>an
>>nVidia partner.
>>
>>I think I've only seen one driver in the past year that was unsigned, and
>>that was associated with a utility that may have been a hack.
>>
>>Apparently beta and unsigned are not equivalent.
>
> True.
>
> Beta means that the driver isn't at the final release point and is
> only for testing. All beta drivers will be unsigned drivers as well.
>
> Unsigned means it's not designed for the operating system in
> question... i.e., it doesn't pass all of MS's tests.
>
> Not all unsigned drivers are beta drivers.
>
>>
>>Perhaps some MVP can shed light on this. I can't explain the OPs problem
>>I
>>have not shared it.
>>
>>Return address scrambled. Replace nkbob with bobkn.
>>
>>"Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
>>news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>> Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
>>> signed drivers or removed from the system.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
>>> * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
>>> * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
>>> * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mirey86" <guest@unknown-email.com> wrote in message
>>> news:b78bb9c354889b8579d385184e01d6e1@nntp-gateway.com...
>>>>
>>>> I'm using Vista Business 64 bit and I noticed I cannot install beta
>>>> Nvidia video card drivers...after doing some Googling apparently 64 bit
>>>> versions of vista do not allow you to use beta drivers that don't have
>>>> digitally signed signatures...there is apparently a work around in
>>>> which
>>>> you can hit the F8 key on bootup and choose the option to 'Disable
>>>> Driver Signature Enforcement'
>>>>
>>>> but this only works for the current boot session...I tried this method
>>>> and it still did not work every time...do I need to go into F8 every
>>>> time I boot my system up with the beta drivers or only the first time I
>>>> install the beta drivers?
>>>>
>>>> makes it a real pain to install beta drivers in Vista
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Mirey86
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
 
"Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
> signed drivers or removed from the system.

This driver signing is beginning to sound like extortion. Somehow it is
leading to 3rd party application providers to have to pay Micro$oft or no
signed drivers for the M$ OS. This will raise costs in that vendors have to
pander to Microsoft.

If a user authorizes a 3rd party driver, it should never prompt again.

Just an observation.
 
Canuck57 wrote:
> "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
> news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
>
>>Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
>>signed drivers or removed from the system.
>
>
> This driver signing is beginning to sound like extortion. Somehow it is
> leading to 3rd party application providers to have to pay Micro$oft or no
> signed drivers for the M$ OS. This will raise costs in that vendors have to
> pander to Microsoft.
>
> If a user authorizes a 3rd party driver, it should never prompt again.
>
> Just an observation.
>
You're delusional!

Just an observation.
Frank
 
Sadly, your assumption fails from the beginning. There is no fee to
Microsoft nor to anyone else to sign drivers. To sign or not to sign is the
choice of the vendor. There are a great many white papers and guides on the
subject.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/


"Canuck57" <dave-no_spam@unixhome.net> wrote in message
news:fl%0k.245$js6.163@pd7urf1no...

> This driver signing is beginning to sound like extortion. Somehow it is
> leading to 3rd party application providers to have to pay Micro$oft or no
> signed drivers for the M$ OS. This will raise costs in that vendors have
> to pander to Microsoft.
>
> If a user authorizes a 3rd party driver, it should never prompt again.
>
> Just an observation.
 
Canuck57 wrote:
> "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote in message
> news:unfokVJxIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
>> Yes, F8 is required for each boot-up until the drivers are replaced with
>> signed drivers or removed from the system.
>
> This driver signing is beginning to sound like extortion. Somehow it is
> leading to 3rd party application providers to have to pay Micro$oft or no
> signed drivers for the M$ OS. This will raise costs in that vendors have to
> pander to Microsoft.
>
> If a user authorizes a 3rd party driver, it should never prompt again.
>
> Just an observation.


Yes another money making gig- not MS but some "Authority"
 
Richard G. Harper wrote:
> Sadly, your assumption fails from the beginning. There is no fee to
> Microsoft nor to anyone else to sign drivers. To sign or not to sign is
> the choice of the vendor. There are a great many white papers and
> guides on the subject.
>


Quote one then that costs nothing....
 
Nonny wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400, "Bob Knowlden" <nkbob@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm a bit confused here.
>>
>> I have been using beta Geforce drivers for over a year on Vista Home Premium
>> X64. I have received warnings on the betas that the source cannot be
>> verified, but I was able to choose to install the drivers. I believe that
>> they were signed, although they were not WHQL blessed. The current drivers I
>> have in place are betas (175.80) that were leaked through the website of an
>> nVidia partner.
>>
>> I think I've only seen one driver in the past year that was unsigned, and
>> that was associated with a utility that may have been a hack.
>>
>> Apparently beta and unsigned are not equivalent.
>
> True.
>
> Beta means that the driver isn't at the final release point and is
> only for testing. All beta drivers will be unsigned drivers as well.
>
> Unsigned means it's not designed for the operating system in
> question... i.e., it doesn't pass all of MS's tests.

Goddamit are you really that stupid?
 
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:13:38 -0500, Charlie Tame <charlie@tames.net>
wrote:

>Nonny wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:05:55 -0400, "Bob Knowlden" <nkbob@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm a bit confused here.
>>>
>>> I have been using beta Geforce drivers for over a year on Vista Home Premium
>>> X64. I have received warnings on the betas that the source cannot be
>>> verified, but I was able to choose to install the drivers. I believe that
>>> they were signed, although they were not WHQL blessed. The current drivers I
>>> have in place are betas (175.80) that were leaked through the website of an
>>> nVidia partner.
>>>
>>> I think I've only seen one driver in the past year that was unsigned, and
>>> that was associated with a utility that may have been a hack.
>>>
>>> Apparently beta and unsigned are not equivalent.
>>
>> True.
>>
>> Beta means that the driver isn't at the final release point and is
>> only for testing. All beta drivers will be unsigned drivers as well.
>>
>> Unsigned means it's not designed for the operating system in
>> question... i.e., it doesn't pass all of MS's tests.
>
>Goddamit are you really that stupid?

Nope. I just play a person that is on Usenet.
 
Back
Top