Replacement for Windows Media Player

  • Thread starter Thread starter b11_
  • Start date Start date
b11_ ha scritto:
> What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?
the new winamp full is great. you can open almost everything (via
plugin) except dvds, it's stable and light. for dvds i use media player
classic.
cya

wooland
 
b11_ wrote:
> What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?
>
Try RealPlayer. I don't use it but it is an alternative.

--
Dave T.

Never put both feet in your mouth at the same time,
Because then you won't have a leg to stand on.
 
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:26:00 -0800, b11_ wrote:

> What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?

What's wrong with it?

--
Chris Game

"Everything that can be said can be said clearly."
-- Ludwig Wittgenstein
 
"Chris Game" <chrisgame@example.net> wrote in message news:12hy6p5fiti87.dlg@example9876.com...
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:26:00 -0800, b11_ wrote:
>
>> What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?
>
> What's wrong with it?
>
> --
> Chris Game
>
> "Everything that can be said can be said clearly."
> -- Ludwig Wittgenstein

Icouldn't get WMP11 to play DVDs, so I got VLC Media player free from VideoLAN, and it plays dvds fine.
 
On Dec 9, 1:26 pm, b11_ <b...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?

I have been very happy with WinAmp. My system is so much happier with
WMP disabled/blocked.
 
I bought a audio CD and I have no problem running the audio files on the CD
but if I transfer the audio files to the hard drive, Vista Windows Media
Player keeps asking me for a lisence!
___________________________________________________________________
"Chris Game" wrote:

> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 11:26:00 -0800, b11_ wrote:
>
> > What are you useing as a replacement for Vista Windows Media Player?
>
> What's wrong with it?
>
> --
> Chris Game
>
> "Everything that can be said can be said clearly."
> -- Ludwig Wittgenstein
>
 
"b11_" <b11@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:2DDE215A-74E7-4F63-B4BD-3405AA79AE80@microsoft.com...
> I bought a audio CD and I have no problem running the audio files on the
> CD
> but if I transfer the audio files to the hard drive, Vista Windows Media
> Player keeps asking me for a lisence!

You have to turn of the DRM(digital rights management) stuff, and it will
stop it for the stuff not already set under it.

--
Ok, I got the big purple f*cker, Sponge Bob is next!!
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
You know what to do with the munge
 
b11_550380 Wrote:
> I bought a audio CD and I have no problem running the audio files on the
> CD but if I transfer the audio files to the hard drive, Vista Windows
> Media Player keeps asking me for a lisence!
>

Change your ripping format to MP3, and you will not have the licencing
(DRM) problems, even if you move the files to another computer.


--
dzomlija

____________________________________
Peter Alexander Dzomlija
Do you hear, huh? The Alpha and The Omega? Death and Rebirth? -And as
you die, so shall I be Reborn-...

- ASUS A8N32-SLI-Deluxe
- AMD Athlon 64 Dual-Core 4800+
- 4GB DDR400
- 128MB ASUS nVidia 6600 PCI-Express
- Thermaltake Tai-Chi Watercooled Chassis
- 1207GB Total Formatted Storage
- Vista Ultimate x64
- CodeGear Delphi 2007See my rig at:
http://s229.photobucket.com/albums/ee312/Dzomlija/Venus/

My Weblog:
'http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/' (http://dzomlija.spaces.live.com/)
 
Or just uncheck the "Copy Protect Music" checkbox, which is unchecked by
default anyways. =)

--
Speaking for myself only.
See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--

"dzomlija" <dzomlija.31zdu5@no-mx.forums.net> wrote in message
news:dzomlija.31zdu5@no-mx.forums.net...
>
> b11_550380 Wrote:
>> I bought a audio CD and I have no problem running the audio files on the
>> CD but if I transfer the audio files to the hard drive, Vista Windows
>> Media Player keeps asking me for a lisence!
>>
>
> Change your ripping format to MP3, and you will not have the licencing
> (DRM) problems, even if you move the files to another computer.
 
How does one turn-off DRM?
_______________________________________________________________

"DarkSentinel" wrote:

> "b11_" <b11@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:2DDE215A-74E7-4F63-B4BD-3405AA79AE80@microsoft.com...
> > I bought a audio CD and I have no problem running the audio files on the
> > CD
> > but if I transfer the audio files to the hard drive, Vista Windows Media
> > Player keeps asking me for a lisence!
>
> You have to turn of the DRM(digital rights management) stuff, and it will
> stop it for the stuff not already set under it.
>
> --
> Ok, I got the big purple f*cker, Sponge Bob is next!!
> http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
> You know what to do with the munge
>
 
"b11_" <b11@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:208B6E1F-8840-4353-95E2-8F8297BF0506@microsoft.com...
> How does one turn-off DRM?

File, Tools, Options...

Under the "Rip Music" tab, uncheck "Copy protect music".

Under the "Privacy" tab, uncheck "Download usage rights automatically..." ,
"Send unique player ID....", and "I want to make Microsoft software..."
boxes.

Click ok, and you're done.

Quite a lot of people find alternative players to get rid of this headache.
I personally use Quintessential Player(QCD) because I like the choice of
skins better. Winamp is ok, VLC is excellent as well.

--
Ok, I got the big purple f*cker, Sponge Bob is next!!
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
You know what to do with the munge
 
"DarkSentinel" <darkmungesentinel@munge.charter.munge.net> wrote:
> Quite a lot of people find alternative players to get rid of this
> headache.

There shouldn't be any difference in DRM between players - either a file
requires DRM or it doesn't. Using WMP or QMP or BMP would generally result
in the same playback for the same file type. =)

> I personally use Quintessential Player(QCD) because I like the choice of
> skins better. Winamp is ok, VLC is excellent as well.

I wrote an old tool to convert WinAMP skins to WMP skins. It's on the net
if you're interested. It's kind of amusing, although the Windows calculator
skin for WMP is perhaps the most amusing. =)

--
Speaking for myself only.
See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
 
"zachd [MSFT]" <zachd@nomailplz.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:ufGf#ZPTIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>
> "DarkSentinel" <darkmungesentinel@munge.charter.munge.net> wrote:
>> Quite a lot of people find alternative players to get rid of this
>> headache.
>
> There shouldn't be any difference in DRM between players - either a file
> requires DRM or it doesn't. Using WMP or QMP or BMP would generally
> result in the same playback for the same file type. =)

Google DRM and see what pops up. If there wasn't such a backlash on this,
why are there so many programs to remove it? Why did Warner decide no DRM on
the catalog from Amazon. I'm not advocating piracy, but I damn sure want to
be able to do what I want with the music I bought without something
interfering with it. And actually it does matter. I purchased some music
from SNOCAP awhile back. An unsigned band called Hierosonic. They play ok
through WMP, and others, but when I run them in SAM broadcaster, it takes
upwards of 5 seconds sometimes to play the song.

>> I personally use Quintessential Player(QCD) because I like the choice of
>> skins better. Winamp is ok, VLC is excellent as well.
>
> I wrote an old tool to convert WinAMP skins to WMP skins. It's on the net
> if you're interested. It's kind of amusing, although the Windows
> calculator skin for WMP is perhaps the most amusing. =)

It's not just the skins. QCD uses noticeably less resources than do WMP or
Winamp. For instance, Winamp will kick both cores up above 24% sometimes.
WMP keeps both cranked close to least 40% most of the time. QCD rarely goes
over 15% on one. Here are some screenshots to show you what I mean...

http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDres.jpg
http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDwamp.jpg
http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDwmp.jpg

As you can see QCD is by far the best choice where resources are concerned.
I've been using it since it came out, and see no reason to stop. Fiancé even
uses it because Winamp keeps crashing under XP for her.

--
Ok, I got the big purple f*cker, Sponge Bob is next!!
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
You know what to do with the munge
 
"DarkSentinel" <darkmungesentinel@munge.charter.munge.net> wrote in message
news:32AFE306-397B-4A04-9B06-AA2950E3837D@microsoft.com...

> "zachd [MSFT]" <zachd@nomailplz.online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:ufGf#ZPTIHA.4684@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> There shouldn't be any difference in DRM between players - either a file
>> requires DRM or it doesn't. Using WMP or QMP or BMP would generally
>> result in the same playback for the same file type. =)

> Google DRM and see what pops up. If there wasn't such a backlash on this,
> why are there so many programs to remove it?

Sadly, DRM isn't often discussed logically (I don't "like" it, but that
doesn't mean I don't think issues are worthy of intelligent
non-emotionally-charged debate), so that would seem more a waste of time
than much more extremely guided research on the subject. Clearly people
love Things That Are Free without any regards to the actual costs in the
production and acquisition systems. *shrug*

I wasn't attempting to say that "some people don't feel strongly about DRM",
merely that either a player supports the file in question (DRM'd or not) or
it doesn't, and that either a file has DRM applied or it doesn't. If the
clip has DRM applied, finding an alternative player would not have much use
or effect. I get your initial point - "some people don't like DRM" - I just
don't think it follows logically that an "alternative player" has anything
to do with getting "rid of this headache". =)

> It's not just the skins. QCD uses noticeably less resources than do WMP or
> Winamp. For instance, Winamp will kick both cores up above 24% sometimes.
> WMP keeps both cranked close to least 40% most of the time. QCD rarely
> goes over 15% on one. Here are some screenshots to show you what I mean...
>
> http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDres.jpg
> http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDwamp.jpg
> http://webpages.charter.net/darksentinel/QCDwmp.jpg

I'm sorry WinAMP crashes for your fiance - you might check with WinAMP
support on that to see if they could fix it up.

The WMP example has a comparatively graphically intensive visualization
active, which would throw a monkey wrench into an 'exact' comparison. But
as long as people enjoy what they're using. =)

--
Speaking for myself only.
See http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html for some helpful WMP info.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
 
Back
Top