RE: Windows Genuine Advantage

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnnn
  • Start date Start date
J

johnnn

My address to all MVPs and Microsoft® developers’ network formally known as
MSDN, I am a proficient Microsoft® Windows® user. I am able to do any job
task in Microsoft® Windows® software, as the current issue is concern it is
the issue of my expertise. I wanna to tell everyone of you all that I have
the expertise to make copy of any Microsoft® software like Windows® and
Office® as legal and Genuine Validate because I have that technology
developed by Microsoft® corporation, I am a half software developer. I am
able to activate and Genuine Validate any copy of MS Windows® like Windows®
XP™, Windows® Vista™, and Office. I know The technological measures used in
Genuine Windows® Activation and Genuine Validation like Windows Product
Activation WPA, Microsoft Product Activation MPA mechanism and how its work.
It is the technology that I used has developed by Microsoft itself I can’t
make that technology but implement that technology, So now I am able to
completely and successfully do that with out any problem or condition (MPA,
WPA, WGA)
--
i wanna give you best possible solution of your Windows troubleshootings /
operating system problems, Dear, my E-Mail address is johncityny@hotmail.com,
you can feel free to e-mail me any time,


"Tom Penharston" wrote:

>
> Windows Genuine Advantage
> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1754886,00.asp
>
> Instead of debating the merits of Genuine Advantage I'm writing this
> post to get advice on configuration steps for brand new computers once
> the initiative starts.
>
>
> INSTALLING BRAND NEW SYSTEMS OFF-LINE
>
>
> I'm under the impression that most serious administrators keep their
> machines off-line until they are patched (I do). When an unpatched
> system goes on-line the window of vulnerability may be one minute or
> one day depending on who you ask, but I think most of us agree that the
> window is becomming shorter each year as viruses become more
> aggressive. (I recall that the Blaster virus was capable of infecting
> an entire subnet in minutes.)
>
>
> QUESTIONS
>
>
> Here are my questions for home users. If Joe downloads updates through
> the Microsoft Download Center using Genuine Advantage, what's to stop
> Joe from burning a CD for Mary with the executable update files? Will
> Mary be prevented from installing the patches off-line? Thus, a window
> of vulnerabiltiy? What's the absolute best way for Mary to handle the
> situation? Please don't tell me it shouldn't be that way, just tell me
> the best answer!
>
> Similarly, can we download patches to a Macintosh or Linux computer to
> distribute to a PC?
>
> Here are some questions for business:
>
> SUS Servers have the ability to download all Microsoft updates. Will
> SUS (or SMS) undergo changes under the Windows Genuine Advantage
> initiative? Will each client computer share key codes with SUS? (That
> would be a huge addition to what is now, a very lean update server.)
> So far I'm lead to believe that just one key code would be required but
> I haven't found the information on the Microsoft website. Does anyone
> have a link?
>
> Two similar questions about bulk licensing:
>
> If an organization has purchased multiple computers through an OEM
> dealer must each computer go through Genuine Advantage? If site
> licenses (or upgrade licenses) are purchased through Microsoft's EOPEN
> Open Licensing Program must each individual system go through Genuine
> Advantage?
>
>
> WORK / HOME
>
>
> I guess it's unlikely there will be problems for institutions
> installing computers with RIS, Ghost, or other tools. There will be
> always be a way for us to build safe computers for business, education,
> etc. Genuine Advantage is just another part of the routine now.
>
> I'm a little less optomistic for home users than I am for business.
> Legitimate users will connect to the internet and race against the
> clock to reach a Genuine Advantage web server and a Windows Update web
> server. During that time the neighbor's unpatched, unlicensed,
> infected computer has a chance of making an attack. This has always
> been the case, but now this initiative is likely to cause a surge in
> unprotected systems. That means more of your fellow DSL, Cable Modem,
> or dial-up users are likely to attack you. (That's the point of most
> of the blogs and articles I've read, and I tend to agree.)
>
> In the long run, it's good news for tech-minded people who earn a
> living fixing compters for homes and small businesses, but casual users
> (those with and without valid licenses) are more or less in a fog. I'm
> trying to be neutral, but I have to make a comment about Microsoft. I
> don't think MS knows how to break the fog I don't think they really
> know how to communicate with the average Joe. My confidence would be
> restored by an update check at boot, or ip enable, that is regulated by
> a firewall - and requires no understanding by the user. Then I'd stop
> advocating Mac OS-X and encourage folks to continue using Windows.
> (Hey, I didn't stay as neutral as I intended, but it's tough to do.)
>
> Links would be appreciated. I didn't find my answers at TechNet, maybe
> there is another part of Microsoft's site with good info.
>
> -Tom
>
>
 
Back
Top