B
big.momma.thornton@gmail.com
On Oct 19, 10:21 am, "Sue Romer" <sro...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In the real world people want to "like" something. It just so happens that
> the masses "like" Microsoft and they "like" Windows.
>
> In the bizzaro world of linux advocacy the "advocates" are trying to get
> people to "hate" instead of "like." People don't want to hate, they want to
> like.
>
> So instead of trying to get everyone to "hate" Windows the way you morons
> do, why don't you focus instead on the positive message of getting people to
> "like" linux.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
The people in comp.os.linux.advocacy are not advocates.
They are self serving pompous arses.
Labeling them as Linux advocates is not only a misnomer it's an insult
to the real Linux advocates.
> In the real world people want to "like" something. It just so happens that
> the masses "like" Microsoft and they "like" Windows.
>
> In the bizzaro world of linux advocacy the "advocates" are trying to get
> people to "hate" instead of "like." People don't want to hate, they want to
> like.
>
> So instead of trying to get everyone to "hate" Windows the way you morons
> do, why don't you focus instead on the positive message of getting people to
> "like" linux.
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
The people in comp.os.linux.advocacy are not advocates.
They are self serving pompous arses.
Labeling them as Linux advocates is not only a misnomer it's an insult
to the real Linux advocates.
