On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:47:16 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:
> ray wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:49:37 -0700, Bill Yanaire wrote:
>>
>>> ray wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:20:25 -0500, kevpan815 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Where Is Open Source Linux Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha 4, And Why Is It Late
>>>>> Being Released (It Was Supposed 2 Be Out Today)?!.
>>>> For the record, distrowatch does indeed indicate that said Alpha was
>>>> released yesterday - Aug 13.
>>> Nobody gives a RATS ASS about some INFERIOR Crapola Open Sores OS
>>> being released.
>>
>> I wouldn't either. BTW - I'm not that familiar with Crapola Open Sores
>> OS - could you give me a link? Actually, we were talking about a high
>> quality Open Source project called Ubuntu - you really should learn to
>> read.
>
> You want a link to that crappy Open Sores OS. Sorry, I won't supply the
> link but the initials of the software is Ubuntu.
>
> If you are talking about a high quality Operating System, check out
> Windows 7. It should run all the software you need.
Hmmmm. win7 may indeed be a high quality operating system - I've tried it
out a little, but not enough to make that call. But one thing is for
certain - it IS a BARE operating system. No decent photo editing
software, no office suite included - I could go on, but you get the idea.
When I load an operating system, I do so with the expectation that it
will be USEFUL and that I will be able to do what I want without the
expenditure of another $1000 (or name any other figure) to do something.
>
> If you just want to play around with your computer and get nothing done,
> Ubuntu is for you.