P
Peter Köhlmann
dennis@home wrote:
>
>
> "CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4760B2BC.E9073AE2@yahoo.com...
>> NoStop wrote:
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> See above.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway that isn't the point.. the point is that just making the
>>>> source available doesn't mean you can't still hide a backdoor.
>>>> Its another of those ill founded assumptions people make about
>>>> open source that having the source on view makes it impossible
>>>> to hide stuff.
>>>
>>> The ONLY ill-founded assumptions around here is YOUR assumption,
>>> that you know wtf you're babbling about. Gawd, are you an idiot.
>>
>> I think dennis has simply been promulgating Ritchies exposure of a
>> method, from back in the 70's or so. It just requires a single
>> supplier of compilers, which is what Microsoft attempts to be. It
>> is perfectly valid.
>
> I notice that it is always the same group that claim I don't know what I
> am talking about
Well, actually you don't know shit.
You are barely able to push a mouse around and click and bright colored
icons
Your imbecile "example" of a "malware compiler" *needs* a single compiler to
have a tiny chance of working
That already excludes linux, as there are several compilers, and
additionally cross-compilers
> and that they are the ones that are always wrong.
Certainly. You are the one who is right, even if you know nothing about the
subject (witness your total idiocy about MD5), yet everyone else (including
the security experts you were given the links to) is wrong
> That probably explains their need for insults as they lack any technical
> knowledge.
A slightly demented loaf of bread is smarter than you, and certainly knows
mor about "technical stuff" than you could ever hope to learn
> I am surprised they run Linux as they appear to be more suited to driving
> a Mac or maybe one of the new OLPs (without modifications).
Well, people who are smarter than a rotten turnip tend not to run garbage
like Vista (or OSX, for that matter). You certainly make your ilk proud.
You are running Vista, and it shows. Idiocy at its best
--
Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some
of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?
>
>
> "CBFalconer" <cbfalconer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:4760B2BC.E9073AE2@yahoo.com...
>> NoStop wrote:
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>>> See above.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway that isn't the point.. the point is that just making the
>>>> source available doesn't mean you can't still hide a backdoor.
>>>> Its another of those ill founded assumptions people make about
>>>> open source that having the source on view makes it impossible
>>>> to hide stuff.
>>>
>>> The ONLY ill-founded assumptions around here is YOUR assumption,
>>> that you know wtf you're babbling about. Gawd, are you an idiot.
>>
>> I think dennis has simply been promulgating Ritchies exposure of a
>> method, from back in the 70's or so. It just requires a single
>> supplier of compilers, which is what Microsoft attempts to be. It
>> is perfectly valid.
>
> I notice that it is always the same group that claim I don't know what I
> am talking about
Well, actually you don't know shit.
You are barely able to push a mouse around and click and bright colored
icons
Your imbecile "example" of a "malware compiler" *needs* a single compiler to
have a tiny chance of working
That already excludes linux, as there are several compilers, and
additionally cross-compilers
> and that they are the ones that are always wrong.
Certainly. You are the one who is right, even if you know nothing about the
subject (witness your total idiocy about MD5), yet everyone else (including
the security experts you were given the links to) is wrong
> That probably explains their need for insults as they lack any technical
> knowledge.
A slightly demented loaf of bread is smarter than you, and certainly knows
mor about "technical stuff" than you could ever hope to learn
> I am surprised they run Linux as they appear to be more suited to driving
> a Mac or maybe one of the new OLPs (without modifications).
Well, people who are smarter than a rotten turnip tend not to run garbage
like Vista (or OSX, for that matter). You certainly make your ilk proud.
You are running Vista, and it shows. Idiocy at its best
--
Just out of curiosity does this actually mean something or have some
of the few remaining bits of your brain just evaporated?