Re: Ubuntu is a worhtless POS...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter Köhlmann
  • Start date Start date
P

Peter Köhlmann

Frank wrote:

> Christopher Hunter wrote:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So you keep saying.. however the facts differ from your lies.
>>
>>
>> No. The "Vista" box across the room from me lasted just 20 minutes when
>> connected to the 'net before it began spewing spam.
>
> Do you actually think anyone who has Vista believes that lie for one
> second? Are you that fukkin dumb?

He was generous with the 20 minutes
After all, a standard install of XP will not even get the first update
before it is hit with the first malware if you are unlucky enough

< snip more lunacy from "Frank", worlds dumbest poster >
--
Microsoft's Product Strategy: "It compiles, let's ship it!"
 
Peter Köhlmann wrote:

> He was generous with the 20 minutes

Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so I
did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the rubbish,
with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.

> After all, a standard install of XP will not even get the first update
> before it is hit with the first malware if you are unlucky enough

/Any/ version of Windows - with the exception of the special "Friends of
Bill" versions that the people posting here obviously have - is unusably
insecure. The Windows idiots haven't realised yet that /nobody/ uses
Windows for any /serious/ computing...

> < snip more lunacy from "Frank", worlds dumbest poster >

Oh! /That/ fool's back is he? He /deserves/ Vista. He's too stupid to
realise that he's widely killfiled and nobody takes his dribbling nonsense
seriously.

C.
 
"Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>
> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so
> I
> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the rubbish,
> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>

Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to install..
mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.

>> After all, a standard install of XP will not even get the first update
>> before it is hit with the first malware if you are unlucky enough
>
> /Any/ version of Windows - with the exception of the special "Friends of
> Bill" versions that the people posting here obviously have - is unusably
> insecure. The Windows idiots haven't realised yet that /nobody/ uses
> Windows for any /serious/ computing...

You obviously get the special enemies of Bill version and everyone else gets
the normal one.
Either that or you are really are as stupid as we think.

>> < snip more lunacy from "Frank", worlds dumbest poster >
>
> Oh! /That/ fool's back is he? He /deserves/ Vista. He's too stupid to
> realise that he's widely killfiled and nobody takes his dribbling nonsense
> seriously.

You appear to.
 
dennis@home wrote:

>
>
> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>
>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>
>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so
>> I
>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>> rubbish,
>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>
>
> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>
I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
(XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?

Cheers.

--
Frank's Brain Activity Plotted (watch the red line):
http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i4/Astronomy2/PreformanceMonitor.jpg

AlexB: "If it is Business or Ultimate open Command Prompt as administrator
and type lusrmgr.msc."
^^^^^
I must say the developers at Microsoft do have a sense of humour.
 
NoStop wrote:
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so
>>> I
>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>> rubbish,
>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>
>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>
> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>
> Cheers.
>

He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots. IOW,
he's LYING by omission.

Alias
 
NoStop wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>
>>
>>"Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>>>Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>
>>>Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so
>>>I
>>>did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>rubbish,
>>>with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
>>>again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>
>>
>>Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>
>
> I don't know about Vista,

Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!

but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?

Duh!!!
Frank
>
> Cheers.
>
 
Alias wrote:

> NoStop wrote:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>
>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>
>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>> quickly, so
>>>> I
>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>> rubbish,
>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>> 'net
>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>
>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>
>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>
> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots. IOW,
> he's LYING by omission.
>
> Alias


hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
Frank
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> NoStop wrote:
>>
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>> I
>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to
>>>>> the 'net
>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>
>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>> Windoze on
>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>
>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots. IOW,
>> he's LYING by omission.
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
> Frank

Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.

Alias
 
I installed probably about 8 Vistas and at least a dozen XPs.

Vista installation is fast, requires only one reboot as far as I remember.
It takes care of ALL, and I mean it, ALL drivers. You don't have to do
anything, just sit and wait.

XP installation is a nightmare, requires about two days AT EAST. you have to
look for all drivers, inf file, dlls, other files with weird extensions.
After a few XPs installed I wrote a program that swept my entire computer
(actually a few) and collected all relevant files in a special directory. I
even called it Installation Files. After that subsequent installations were
easier but not completely trouble free.

The trouble at later stages was that drivers get old, corrupted, not
harmonized with latest update, etc.

Vista is a great OS. It is pitiful that unscrupulous and dishonest people
spread slander and lies about it.


"Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>
>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>
> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly, so
> I
> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the rubbish,
> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the 'net
> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>
>> After all, a standard install of XP will not even get the first update
>> before it is hit with the first malware if you are unlucky enough
>
> /Any/ version of Windows - with the exception of the special "Friends of
> Bill" versions that the people posting here obviously have - is unusably
> insecure. The Windows idiots haven't realised yet that /nobody/ uses
> Windows for any /serious/ computing...
>
>> < snip more lunacy from "Frank", worlds dumbest poster >
>
> Oh! /That/ fool's back is he? He /deserves/ Vista. He's too stupid to
> realise that he's widely killfiled and nobody takes his dribbling nonsense
> seriously.
>
> C.
>
 
Frank wrote:

> NoStop wrote:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>"Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>
>>>>Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>
>>>>Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly,
>>>>so I
>>>>did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>rubbish,
>>>>with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>>'net again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>
>>
>> I don't know about Vista,
>
> Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!
>
> but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>
> Duh!!!

Well, has it changed in Vista, Mr. Vista Expert? Or you don't know and
Duh!!! is your only response?

Cheers.

> Frank
>>
>> Cheers.
>>

--
Frank's Brain Activity Plotted (watch the red line):
http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i4/Astronomy2/PreformanceMonitor.jpg

AlexB: "If it is Business or Ultimate open Command Prompt as administrator
and type lusrmgr.msc."
^^^^^
I must say the developers at Microsoft do have a sense of humour.
 
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to
>>>>>> the 'net
>>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>>> Windoze on
>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>
>>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots.
>>> IOW, he's LYING by omission.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>>
>> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
>> Frank
>
>
> Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.
>
> Alias

Still having trouble with the truth?
Figures, mr liar, mr troll, mr spammer, mr bigot.
Frank
 
NoStop wrote:

> Frank wrote:
>
>
>>NoStop wrote:
>>
>>
>>>dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly,
>>>>>so I
>>>>>did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>rubbish,
>>>>>with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>>>'net again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I don't know about Vista,
>>
>>Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!
>>
>> but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>>
>>>(XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>>reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>
>>Duh!!!
>
>
> Well, has it changed in Vista, Mr. Vista Expert? Or you don't know and
> Duh!!! is your only response?
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>>Frank
>>
>>>Cheers.
>>>
>
>
And you actually give a sh*t because...?
Frank
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to
>>>>>>> the 'net
>>>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>>>> Windoze on
>>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>>>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots.
>>>> IOW, he's LYING by omission.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Still having trouble with the truth?

Not at all. It's you that has that problem.

> Figures, mr liar, mr troll, mr spammer, mr bigot.
> Frank

Describing yourself again won't cut it. Try something new like gettin a
brain that works.

Alias
 
NoStop wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> NoStop wrote:
>>
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so quickly,
>>>>> so I
>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>>> 'net again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>
>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>> I don't know about Vista,
>> Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!
>>
>> but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>> Duh!!!
>
> Well, has it changed in Vista, Mr. Vista Expert? Or you don't know and
> Duh!!! is your only response?
>
> Cheers.
>
>> Frank
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>

Frank didn't install his one copy of Vista Basic, a real tech did, so he
doesn't know if it needs reboots or not. I have installed it and I can
assure that it does.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to
>>>>>>>> the 'net
>>>>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17 minutes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>>>>> Windoze on
>>>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also
>>>>>> required
>>>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>>>>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots.
>>>>> IOW, he's LYING by omission.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Still having trouble with the truth?
>
>
> Not at all. It's you that has that problem.
>
>> Figures, mr liar, mr troll, mr spammer, mr bigot.
>> Frank
>
>
> Describing yourself again won't cut it. Try something new like gettin a
> brain that works.
>
> Alias

Trying to lie your way out of your previous lies simple won't work.
Try something new...like telling the truth, mr liar, mr troll, mr
spammer, mr bigot...LOL!
Idiot!
Frank
 
Alias wrote:

> NoStop wrote:
>
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>> quickly,
>>>>>> so I
>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>>>> 'net again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17
>>>>>> minutes.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't know about Vista,
>>>
>>> Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!
>>>
>>> but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>>>
>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>
>>> Duh!!!
>>
>>
>> Well, has it changed in Vista, Mr. Vista Expert? Or you don't know and
>> Duh!!! is your only response?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>
>
> Frank didn't install his one copy of Vista Basic, a real tech did, so he
> doesn't know if it needs reboots or not. I have installed it and I can
> assure that it does.
>
> Alias

You've never installed Vista...you don't have Vista...you can't afford
Vista...you are a broke, lying linux loser.
Live with it!
Moron.
Frank
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> Frank wrote:
>>
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>
>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it
>>>>>>>>> to the 'net
>>>>>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17
>>>>>>>>> minutes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>>>>>> Windoze on
>>>>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the
>>>>>>> manufacturer's
>>>>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also
>>>>>>> required
>>>>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>>>>>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots.
>>>>>> IOW, he's LYING by omission.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
>>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Still having trouble with the truth?
>>
>>
>> Not at all. It's you that has that problem.
>>
>>> Figures, mr liar, mr troll, mr spammer, mr bigot.
>>> Frank
>>
>>
>> Describing yourself again won't cut it. Try something new like gettin
>> a brain that works.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Trying to lie your way out of your previous lies simple won't work.
> Try something new...like telling the truth, mr liar, mr troll, mr
> spammer, mr bigot...LOL!
> Idiot!
> Frank

I don't lie. You do. End of story.

Alias
 
Frank wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>
>> NoStop wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk> wrote in
>>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>>> quickly,
>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it to the
>>>>>>> 'net again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17
>>>>>>> minutes.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about Vista,
>>>>
>>>> Finally...a lying linux troll tells the truth...for once!!!
>>>>
>>>> but the last Windoze box I installed Windoze on
>>>>
>>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the manufacturer's
>>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also required
>>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>
>>>> Duh!!!
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, has it changed in Vista, Mr. Vista Expert? Or you don't know and
>>> Duh!!! is your only response?
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Frank didn't install his one copy of Vista Basic, a real tech did, so
>> he doesn't know if it needs reboots or not. I have installed it and I
>> can assure that it does.
>>
>> Alias
>
> You've never installed Vista...you don't have Vista...you can't afford
> Vista...you are a broke, lying linux loser.
> Live with it!
> Moron.
> Frank

Got any more fantasies for the group, Frank? The fact that you say Vista
doesn't need rebooting when installing it, the programs you want, anti
malware crap, drivers and devices only proves you've never installed Vista.

Alias
 
Alias wrote:
> Frank wrote:
>
>> Alias wrote:
>>
>>> Frank wrote:
>>>
>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Frank wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Alias wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NoStop wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Christopher Hunter" <chrisehunter@NOSPAMblueyonder.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>> wrote in
>>>>>>>>> message news:O0Rrj.88379$3m6.81767@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> He was generous with the 20 minutes
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Yes. I couldn't believe that it could be taken over quite so
>>>>>>>>>> quickly, so
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> did a complete reinstall of "Vista". It took forever to load the
>>>>>>>>>> rubbish,
>>>>>>>>>> with the endless reboots and loading drivers. I connected it
>>>>>>>>>> to the 'net
>>>>>>>>>> again /with/ the "Firewall" enabled, and it lasted just 17
>>>>>>>>>> minutes.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now we know you are lying.. vista doesn't need endless reboots to
>>>>>>>>> install.. mine took two which compares well with Ubuntu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know about Vista, but the last Windoze box I installed
>>>>>>>> Windoze on
>>>>>>>> (XP) certainly required MANY reboots. Just getting the
>>>>>>>> manufacturer's
>>>>>>>> drivers installed required a reboot to install EACH of the devices
>>>>>>>> supported by the manufacturer. Some other device drivers also
>>>>>>>> required
>>>>>>>> reboots to get installed. This has changed in Vista?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's only including Vista, not all the programs, device drivers,
>>>>>>> updates, etc. that you need to install that require many reboots.
>>>>>>> IOW, he's LYING by omission.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hehehe...and you know all about lying, right...LOL!
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, I see your lies every time you post.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still having trouble with the truth?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Not at all. It's you that has that problem.
>>>
>>>> Figures, mr liar, mr troll, mr spammer, mr bigot.
>>>> Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Describing yourself again won't cut it. Try something new like gettin
>>> a brain that works.
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Trying to lie your way out of your previous lies simple won't work.
>> Try something new...like telling the truth, mr liar, mr troll, mr
>> spammer, mr bigot...LOL!
>> Idiot!
>> Frank
>
>
> I don't lie. You do. End of story.
>
> Alias

Wrong and that won't work.
Tell us all why a lying linux troll like you is even in this ng?
Well...?
Frank
 
Back
Top