Re: [News] KDE4 Desktop Finds Early Lovers

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:


> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>
> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>


But........

You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
4.x?

So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?

What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[The Ghost In The Machine]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
<brick_n_straw@gmail.com>
wrote
on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400
<112gurw8i2nhe$.1kapjbjey01l6$.dlg@40tude.net>:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>
>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>
>
>
> But........
>
> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
> 4.x?

There is plenty wrong with KDE 4.0. For starters, it looks nothing at
all like Gnome, and the set-points of the GUI configuration do not
overlap 100%.

>
> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?

Not at all. One can merely go back to Windows Vista,
which is now stable.

>
> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>

--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Linux. Because Windows' Blue Screen Of Death is just
way too frightening to novice users.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:47:18 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:

> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
> <brick_n_straw@gmail.com>
> wrote
> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400
> <112gurw8i2nhe$.1kapjbjey01l6$.dlg@40tude.net>:
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>
>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>
>>
>>
>> But........
>>
>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>> 4.x?
>
> There is plenty wrong with KDE 4.0. For starters, it looks nothing at
> all like Gnome, and the set-points of the GUI configuration do not
> overlap 100%.
>
>>
>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>
> Not at all. One can merely go back to Windows Vista,
> which is now stable.
>
>>
>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>

Yawwn....
You're starting to bore me Ghost....
Get back on the rails again instead of purposely being obtuse like
Jebbidiah...

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[Ben]

Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>
>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>
>
>
> But........
>
> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
> 4.x?
>
> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>
> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>

Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
have one word for you:

Vista.

 

[Rick]

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>
>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>
>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>
>>
>
> But........
>
> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
> 4.x?
>
> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>
> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....

I have already given you references from the devs plainly stating that
KDE4 is not yet ready for production machines. It is a bleeding edge
release. It is out there to find the bugs and fix them.

Here are som more:
<http://www.linux.com/feature/141769>

<http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080710131440951>

4.1 should --approach-- production status. Approach.

This is what happens when people just pick up a tool, and try to use it
without first learning how to use it.

--
Rick

 

[FAB]

Ben wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>
>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>> feature-complete as
>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not
>>> going
>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>
>>
>>
>> But........
>>
>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>> 4.x?
>>
>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>
>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>
>
> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
> have one word for you:
>
> Vista.

And I have one word for you:

Liar!

 

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:16:40 +0100, Ben wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>
>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>
>>
>>
>> But........
>>
>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>> 4.x?
>>
>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>
>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>
>
> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
> have one word for you:
>
> Vista.

Nice try, but I am certainly no fan of Vista.
I'm on record many times as stating such...

The difference is, the Linux loons have been denying that problems exist
with kde 4.x and now all of a sudden they post tripe like "when the bugs
get fixed" etc....

Hypocrites....
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:54:19 -0500, Rick wrote:

> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>
>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But........
>>
>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>> 4.x?
>>
>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>
>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>
> I have already given you references from the devs plainly stating that
> KDE4 is not yet ready for production machines. It is a bleeding edge
> release. It is out there to find the bugs and fix them.

I'm not talking about developers, the real Linux advocates.
I'm talking about Linux loons in COLA.

A totally different animal..
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[Ben]

Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:16:40 +0100, Ben wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>
>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But........
>>>
>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>>> 4.x?
>>>
>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>
>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>
>> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
>> have one word for you:
>>
>> Vista.
>
> Nice try, but I am certainly no fan of Vista.
> I'm on record many times as stating such...
>
> The difference is, the Linux loons have been denying that problems exist
> with kde 4.x and now all of a sudden they post tripe like "when the bugs
> get fixed" etc....
>
> Hypocrites....

I've never thought that KDE 4 has been ready for mainstream release yet.
In fact, I installed it on my laptop (on which I use KDE, the rest of my
computers run on GNOME) and the next day I reverted back to KDE 3.5, and
I've been telling people how buggy it is right now ever since.

 

[Rick]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:57:18 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:16:40 +0100, Ben wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>
>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> But........
>>>
>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with
>>> Kde 4.x?
>>>
>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>
>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>
>>>
>> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
>> have one word for you:
>>
>> Vista.
>
> Nice try, but I am certainly no fan of Vista. I'm on record many times
> as stating such...
>
> The difference is, the Linux loons have been denying that problems exist
> with kde 4.x and now all of a sudden they post tripe like "when the bugs
> get fixed" etc....
>
> Hypocrites....

Bigot bitch. KDE4 is not a production systems. The developers have said
so. At least of the distro packagers have said so. The developers have
said to wait AT LEST for 4.1, and possibly later.



--
Rick

 

[Rick]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:16:08 +0100, Ben wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:16:40 +0100, Ben wrote:
>>
>>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>>
>>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But........
>>>>
>>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with
>>>> Kde 4.x?
>>>>
>>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>>
>>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>>
>>> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
>>> have one word for you:
>>>
>>> Vista.
>>
>> Nice try, but I am certainly no fan of Vista. I'm on record many times
>> as stating such...
>>
>> The difference is, the Linux loons have been denying that problems
>> exist with kde 4.x and now all of a sudden they post tripe like "when
>> the bugs get fixed" etc....
>>
>> Hypocrites....
>
> I've never thought that KDE 4 has been ready for mainstream release yet.

And that is what the KDE guys have been telling people.

> In fact, I installed it on my laptop (on which I use KDE, the rest of my
> computers run on GNOME) and the next day I reverted back to KDE 3.5, and
> I've been telling people how buggy it is right now ever since.

... and that's why KDE 4 was released.. to fix and fix the bugs.

--
Rick

 

[Rick]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:11:47 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:54:19 -0500, Rick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>
>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> But........
>>>
>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with
>>> Kde 4.x?
>>>
>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>
>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>
>> I have already given you references from the devs plainly stating that
>> KDE4 is not yet ready for production machines. It is a bleeding edge
>> release. It is out there to find the bugs and fix them.
>
> I'm not talking about developers, the real Linux advocates. I'm talking
> about Linux loons in COLA.

If there are any loons in COLA, they follow you.

>
> A totally different animal..

... you are fascinated by animals now....


--
Rick

 

[The Wizard of Oz]

The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
> <brick_n_straw@gmail.com>
> wrote
> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400
> <112gurw8i2nhe$.1kapjbjey01l6$.dlg@40tude.net>:
>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>
>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>
>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>
>>
>> But........
>>
>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>> 4.x?
>
> There is plenty wrong with KDE 4.0. For starters, it looks nothing at
> all like Gnome, and the set-points of the GUI configuration do not
> overlap 100%.

Don't take this the wrong way. First off don't respond to whiny
immature name calling trolls. It only means you are sinking to their
level. It's best to ignore them. The argument "They started it first"
just doesn't cut it in the maturity department IMHO.

I agree there is a lot wrong with KDE 4.0. I've been using it for a few
months. Mainly because somebody goofed with the Kubuntu (KDE 3) I
downloaded so I couldn't get past the network manager to connect to the
net for updates or anything. It's a Kubuntu thing not a KDE thing
because other people are using KDE just fine.

Who cares if KDE looks like Gnome... For that matter who cares if Vista
looks like Windows 2.0... If people like the look of Gnome they'll run
Gnome. The whole reason for running KDE is because it is different from
Gnome.

>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>
> Not at all. One can merely go back to Windows Vista,
> which is now stable.

KDE 4 is getting more stable with each update. I gather Vista is being
abandoned in favour of Windows 7. Micro$oft must be doing that for a reason.

>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>
>
Whine whine whine... Whimper whimper whimper... Is that all you trolls
can come up with? (sorry for going against my own suggestion)

Later
Mike

 

[Ben]

Rick wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:16:08 +0100, Ben wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:16:40 +0100, Ben wrote:
>>>
>>>> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>>>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>>>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> But........
>>>>>
>>>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with
>>>>> Kde 4.x?
>>>>>
>>>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>>>
>>>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>>>
>>>> Don't talk about initial releases of Linux products being unstable. I
>>>> have one word for you:
>>>>
>>>> Vista.
>>> Nice try, but I am certainly no fan of Vista. I'm on record many times
>>> as stating such...
>>>
>>> The difference is, the Linux loons have been denying that problems
>>> exist with kde 4.x and now all of a sudden they post tripe like "when
>>> the bugs get fixed" etc....
>>>
>>> Hypocrites....
>> I've never thought that KDE 4 has been ready for mainstream release yet.
>
> And that is what the KDE guys have been telling people.
>
>> In fact, I installed it on my laptop (on which I use KDE, the rest of my
>> computers run on GNOME) and the next day I reverted back to KDE 3.5, and
>> I've been telling people how buggy it is right now ever since.
>
> ... and that's why KDE 4 was released.. to fix and fix the bugs.
>

Yup. I was just responding to Moshe's rant that Linux users have been
telling everyone that KDE 4 is ready for mainstream use.

 

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:31:17 -0500, Rick wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 11:11:47 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:54:19 -0500, Rick wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>>
>>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and
>>>>> feature-complete as 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5
>>>>> next month. It's not going away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> But........
>>>>
>>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with
>>>> Kde 4.x?
>>>>
>>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>>>
>>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>
>>> I have already given you references from the devs plainly stating that
>>> KDE4 is not yet ready for production machines. It is a bleeding edge
>>> release. It is out there to find the bugs and fix them.
>>
>> I'm not talking about developers, the real Linux advocates. I'm talking
>> about Linux loons in COLA.
>
> If there are any loons in COLA, they follow you.
>
>>
>> A totally different animal..
>
> .. you are fascinated by animals now....

Sure...
I have 3 cats and a nice 110 gallon marine aquarium.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[the wharf rat]

In article <bjweh63z5an$.t1w3000oq6g2$.dlg@40tude.net>,
Moshe Goldfarb. <brick_n_straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>I have 3 cats and a nice 110 gallon marine aquarium.
>

I didn't even know cats could swim. Or do you mean you've
got them doing their AIT?

 

[Moshe Goldfarb.]

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC), the wharf rat wrote:

> In article <bjweh63z5an$.t1w3000oq6g2$.dlg@40tude.net>,
> Moshe Goldfarb. <brick_n_straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>I have 3 cats and a nice 110 gallon marine aquarium.
>>
>
> I didn't even know cats could swim. Or do you mean you've
> got them doing their AIT?

Cute....
Actually cats are very good swimmers.
One of my cats, Tiberious, loves to swim in the pool.
The others will swim to the end and hop out when tossed into the pool.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

 

[The Ghost In The Machine]

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, The Wizard of Oz
<Wizard@EmeraldCity.gov>
wrote
on Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:52:58 GMT
<uPofk.111209$gc5.50956@pd7urf2no>:
> The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Moshe Goldfarb.
>> <brick_n_straw@gmail.com>
>> wrote
>> on Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:11:06 -0400
>> <112gurw8i2nhe$.1kapjbjey01l6$.dlg@40tude.net>:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:56:05 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> That's what they labeled early builds of 4.0. Or 3.8...
>>>>
>>>> There's plenty of time for KDE4 to become as stable and feature-complete as
>>>> 3.5.x. There will be another new release of 3.5 next month. It's not going
>>>> away until KDE4 is rock solid.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But........
>>>
>>> You Linux loons have been claiming that there is nothing wrong with Kde
>>> 4.x?
>>
>> There is plenty wrong with KDE 4.0. For starters, it looks nothing at
>> all like Gnome, and the set-points of the GUI configuration do not
>> overlap 100%.
>
> Don't take this the wrong way. First off don't respond to whiny
> immature name calling trolls. It only means you are sinking to their
> level. It's best to ignore them. The argument "They started it first"
> just doesn't cut it in the maturity department IMHO.

If it's a legitimate target I reserve the right to follow their water
pistol with an elephant gun. -) I suppose I could have clarified
in that the problems predated KDE 4.0 KDE 3.5 clearly does not
look like Gnome either.

>
> I agree there is a lot wrong with KDE 4.0. I've been using it for a few
> months. Mainly because somebody goofed with the Kubuntu (KDE 3) I
> downloaded so I couldn't get past the network manager to connect to the
> net for updates or anything. It's a Kubuntu thing not a KDE thing
> because other people are using KDE just fine.
>
> Who cares if KDE looks like Gnome...

Snit does. -)

> For that matter who cares if Vista
> looks like Windows 2.0... If people like the look of Gnome they'll run
> Gnome. The whole reason for running KDE is because it is different from
> Gnome.

And here I thought the entire reason for running something was to get a
job done.

>
>>> So now we have to wait until KDE 4.x is stable?
>>
>> Not at all. One can merely go back to Windows Vista,
>> which is now stable.
>
> KDE 4 is getting more stable with each update. I gather Vista is being
> abandoned in favour of Windows 7. Micro$oft must be doing that for a reason.

To make more money?

>
>>> What a bunch of liars you Linux loons are....
>>>
>>
> Whine whine whine... Whimper whimper whimper... Is that all you trolls
> can come up with? (sorry for going against my own suggestion)

*shrug*

>
> Later
> Mike


--
#191, ewill3@earthlink.net
Insert random misquote here.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 

[relic]

Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC), the wharf rat wrote:
>
>> In article <bjweh63z5an$.t1w3000oq6g2$.dlg@40tude.net>,
>> Moshe Goldfarb. <brick_n_straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have 3 cats and a nice 110 gallon marine aquarium.
>>>
>>
>> I didn't even know cats could swim. Or do you mean you've
>> got them doing their AIT?
>
> Cute....
> Actually cats are very good swimmers.
> One of my cats, Tiberious, loves to swim in the pool.


> The others will swim to the end and hop out when tossed into the pool.

They won't if you put them into a burlap sack.

 

[meerkat]

"relic" <relic2@cjb.net> wrote in message
news:21i4h5.qa7.19.1@news.alt.net...
> Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:52:11 +0000 (UTC), the wharf rat wrote:
>>
>>> In article <bjweh63z5an$.t1w3000oq6g2$.dlg@40tude.net>,
>>> Moshe Goldfarb. <brick_n_straw@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have 3 cats and a nice 110 gallon marine aquarium.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't even know cats could swim. Or do you mean you've
>>> got them doing their AIT?
>>
>> Cute....
>> Actually cats are very good swimmers.
>> One of my cats, Tiberious, loves to swim in the pool.
>
>
>> The others will swim to the end and hop out when tossed into the pool.
>
> They won't if you put them into a burlap sack.
That`s definitely worth a smile %> ).