Re: Linux: "not cool"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Moshe Goldfarb
  • Start date Start date
M

Moshe Goldfarb

On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:31:39 -0400, DFS wrote:

> "I'm gettin' ******* tired of this ... ****, windows's more stable than this
> ... I'll seriously consider what OS to run, but as for now Feisty is way to
> unstable ....I think I'm going back to Debian until this is solved ...
>
> this is not cool"
>
> #421 at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=412125&page=43


When the number one distribution on the Distrowatch list is this bad it
makes you wonder about the other 599 varieties of Linux.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
 
Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:31:39 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> "I'm gettin' ******* tired of this ... ****, windows's more stable
>> than this ... I'll seriously consider what OS to run, but as for now
>> Feisty is way to unstable ....I think I'm going back to Debian until
>> this is solved ...
>>
>> this is not cool"
>>
>> #421 at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=412125&page=43

>
> When the number one distribution on the Distrowatch list is this bad
> it makes you wonder about the other 599 varieties of Linux.


I found Gutsy to be more stable: If it wasn't for the install repeatedly
crashing I'd have it on dual-boot with XP
..
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
- Personalised Desktop Computers
 
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:30:06 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:31:39 -0400, DFS wrote:
>
>> "I'm gettin' ******* tired of this ... ****, windows's more stable than
>> this ... I'll seriously consider what OS to run, but as for now Feisty
>> is way to unstable ....I think I'm going back to Debian until this is
>> solved ...
>>
>> this is not cool"
>>
>> #421 at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=412125&page=43

>
> When the number one distribution on the Distrowatch list is this bad it
> makes you wonder about the other 599 varieties of Linux.


If Linux is so bad, why do you and your family use it?

--
Rick
 
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:24:54 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:

Nobody except idiots like Schestowitz cares what you say HPT.
Your constant nymshifting and antics make you a fool.

Go back to Cnntp and troll some more.

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/
 
"Dr.Hal0nf1r£$" <femail@nospam.kustomkomputa.co.uk.invalid> wrote in message
news:K4OdnTfYZaTKvZvVnZ2dnUVZ8radnZ2d@bt.com...
> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 00:31:39 -0400, DFS wrote:
>>
>>> "I'm gettin' ******* tired of this ... ****, windows's more stable
>>> than this ... I'll seriously consider what OS to run, but as for now
>>> Feisty is way to unstable ....I think I'm going back to Debian until
>>> this is solved ...
>>>
>>> this is not cool"
>>>
>>> #421 at http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=412125&page=43

>>
>> When the number one distribution on the Distrowatch list is this bad
>> it makes you wonder about the other 599 varieties of Linux.

>
> I found Gutsy to be more stable: If it wasn't for the install repeatedly
> crashing I'd have it on dual-boot with XP
> .


Linsux crashing? OMG
 
Back
Top