Re: how can i clear all password that is cached on a rodc

  • Thread starter Thread starter ~BD~
  • Start date Start date
B

~BD~


> "~BD~" wrote in message
> news:egshZNmWJHA.556@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>>
>> "Paul Adare" wrote in message
>> news:hkmdx9ilkrc4.1qxm51kc3j0j4$.dlg@40tude.net...
>>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:37:01 -0000, ~BD~, le grand imb?cile, dit:
>>>
>>
>>
>> I will parry with mentioning yet another error spotted on your web site.
>>
>> On this page http://www.identit.ca/events.html you will note that the
>> dark grey 'bar' is about three-quarters of the way down the page instead
>> of being at the bottom as it is on other pages on your site.
>>
>> Perhaps, as supposedly an IT professional, you should put your own house
>> in order.
>>
>> BD
>>
>> --


"Brian Komar" wrote in message
news:02AF4970-5598-4676-B6D0-D8597C42F601@microsoft.com...
> Veuillez ramper de nouveau dans le trou que vous êtes venu de.
> Merci,
> Brian

To save others reading here simply wondering., the approximate translation
of Mr Komar's comment is:-
"Please crawl again in the hole that you came from. Thank you"

This is not the type of answer might expect to receive from the top man of a
major commercial operation, viz:

Brian Komar - President
Brian Komar is the president of IdentIT Inc., a consulting firm specializing
in Public Key Infrastructure design and implementation and identity
integration solutions. Brian partners with Microsoft on several ventures,
authoring material for Microsoft's Prescriptive Architecture Guides, writing
PKI white papers for Microsoft's Security team, and working as a principal
consultant for the Microsoft Center of Excellence enterprise PKI design
engagements.

Brian is a frequent speaker at IT industry conferences such as Microsoft
Tech.Ed, Microsoft IT Forum, and Windows IT Pro Magazine Connections.

Paul Adare - Chief Technology Officer
Paul Adare, the Chief Technology Officer of IdentIT Inc., is a security
consultant specializing in Identity Management, Rights Management, and
Public Key Infrastructure deployments. Paul has a wide ranging and varied
background including the whole gamut of Microsoft technologies, Lotus Notes,
Sun Microsystems, IBM AIX, and various flavours of UNIX and Linux.

Over the many years that Paul has been involved with computer systems and
security, he has held many different roles including technical training
(Microsoft Certified Trainer, Lotus Notes Certified Trainer, Sun
Microsystems Certified Trainer), consulting (Microsoft, Lotus Notes, Sun,
IBM, Security, Identity Management, Rights Management, PKI), subject matter
expert for Microsoft Learning Products, support and help desk roles among
others. Paul has been involved with Microsoft's Identity Management platform
since he worked as a subject matter expert on the Microsoft Learning Product
Course 2062, Implementing Microsoft Metadirectory Services.

Paul has been the Principal Consultant on a number of enterprise PKI and RMS
deployments for large financial services customers in the US and Canada. In
addition, Paul is a Microsoft MVP for Virtual PC and Virtual Server.

*******************************************

Well, that is what is says here http://www.identit.ca/management.html

I truly wonder if this is fact or fiction. Does anyone reading here know
this firm and/or the people?

Dave

PS A simple "thanks for pointing out the error" would have been a more
realistic response IMO. C'est la vie!
 
Actually, if you used a normal browser, you would see that there is no error
I feel that my reputation is safe,
You are a troll, plain and simple.
I feel that our customers can easily distinguish between a competent
professional (Paul and I) and a complete idiot troll (you)
Welcome to only the 2nd person to ever achieve membership in my disregard
list
Brian
 
"Brian Komar" wrote in message
news:41A47F24-04D2-47A2-BCC8-289A9C7B1D16@microsoft.com...
> Actually, if you used a normal browser, you would see that there is no
> error
> I feel that my reputation is safe,
> You are a troll, plain and simple.
> I feel that our customers can easily distinguish between a competent
> professional (Paul and I) and a complete idiot troll (you)
> Welcome to only the 2nd person to ever achieve membership in my disregard
> list
> Brian
>

--

So - I wonder where in the world you are today Mr Komar (your message timed
at 0916 GMT - somewhat earlier in Canada?)

Perhaps, as a competent professional, you can explain why the error was/is
noticed when using Firefox 3.0.4. I am uncertain why you said "if you used
a normal browser" - surely many folk now use Firefox, don't they? Is it not
a *normal* browser?

I appreciate that Mozilla *might* be at fault, so have submitted an error
report accordingly [Successfully Transmitted Report RMO12289055928792]
Should there be an error at their end, I'm sure they will correct it. I'll
let you know. I'm a little surprised though, that "as a competent
professional", you had not checked your own web site using Firefox.

You have further confused me. How would I ever come into contact with your
customers (so that they may have to distinguish between us?)
I *was* going to contact one of them, but you don't seem to have any! See
http://www.identit.ca/clients.html

Dave

--
 
On Dec 10, 11:03 am, "~BD~" wrote:
> "Brian Komar" wrote in message
>
> news:41A47F24-04D2-47A2-BCC8-289A9C7B1D16@microsoft.com...
>
> > Actually, if you used a normal browser, you would see that there is no
> > error
> > I feel that my reputation is safe,
> > You are a troll, plain and simple.
> > I feel that our customers can easily distinguish between a competent
> > professional (Paul and I) and a complete idiot troll (you)
> > Welcome to only the 2nd person to ever achieve membership in my disregard
> > list
> > Brian
> >
>
> --
>
> So - I wonder where in the world you are today Mr Komar (your message timed
> at 0916 GMT - somewhat earlier in Canada?)
>
> Perhaps, as a competent professional, you can explain why the error was/is
> noticed  when using Firefox 3.0.4. I am uncertain why you said "if you used
> a normal browser" - surely many folk now use Firefox, don't they? Is it not
> a *normal* browser?
>
> I appreciate that Mozilla *might* be at fault, so have submitted an error
> report accordingly [Successfully Transmitted Report RMO12289055928792]
> Should there be an error at their end, I'm sure they will correct it. I'll
> let you know. I'm a little surprised though, that "as a competent
> professional", you had not checked your own web site using Firefox.
>
> You have further confused me. How would I ever come into contact with your
> customers (so that they may have to distinguish between us?)
> I *was* going to contact one of them, but you don't seem to have any! See http://www.identit.ca/clients.html
>
> Dave
>
> --

I regret to advise that I've heard nothing from Mozilla.

You have still not advised what you meant by Firefox not being a
'normal' browser.

Perhaps someone in these groups who is knowledgeable in these matters
could comment as to why your web site appears correctly when viewed
with IE7 but has the 'error' when viewed with Firefox.

I do hope so.

Dave
 
Browser error?

wrote in message
news:b6163781-9bd6-4a27-89dc-1a7f28a98978@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 10, 11:03 am, "~BD~" wrote:
> "Brian Komar" wrote in message
>
> news:41A47F24-04D2-47A2-BCC8-289A9C7B1D16@microsoft.com...
>
> > Actually, if you used a normal browser, you would see that there is
> > no
> > error
> > I feel that my reputation is safe,
> > You are a troll, plain and simple.
> > I feel that our customers can easily distinguish between a competent
> > professional (Paul and I) and a complete idiot troll (you)
> > Welcome to only the 2nd person to ever achieve membership in my
> > disregard
> > list
> > Brian
> >
>
> --
>
> So - I wonder where in the world you are today Mr Komar (your message
> timed
> at 0916 GMT - somewhat earlier in Canada?)
>
> Perhaps, as a competent professional, you can explain why the error
> was/is
> noticed when using Firefox 3.0.4. I am uncertain why you said "if you
> used
> a normal browser" - surely many folk now use Firefox, don't they? Is
> it not
> a *normal* browser?
>
> I appreciate that Mozilla *might* be at fault, so have submitted an
> error
> report accordingly [Successfully Transmitted Report RMO12289055928792]
> Should there be an error at their end, I'm sure they will correct it.
> I'll
> let you know. I'm a little surprised though, that "as a competent
> professional", you had not checked your own web site using Firefox.
>
> You have further confused me. How would I ever come into contact with
> your
> customers (so that they may have to distinguish between us?)
> I *was* going to contact one of them, but you don't seem to have any!
> See http://www.identit.ca/clients.html
>
> Dave
>
> --

I regret to advise that I've heard nothing from Mozilla.

You have still not advised what you meant by Firefox not being a
'normal' browser.

Perhaps someone in these groups who is knowledgeable in these matters
could comment as to why your web site appears correctly when viewed
with IE7 but has the 'error' when viewed with Firefox.

I do hope so.

Dave
 
Re: Browser error?

> wrote in message
> news:b6163781-9bd6-4a27-89dc-1a7f28a98978@r10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 10, 11:03 am, "~BD~" wrote:
>> "Brian Komar" wrote in message
>>
>> news:41A47F24-04D2-47A2-BCC8-289A9C7B1D16@microsoft.com...
>>
>>> Actually, if you used a normal browser, you would see that there is
>>> no
>>> error
>>> I feel that my reputation is safe,
>>> You are a troll, plain and simple.
>>> I feel that our customers can easily distinguish between a competent
>>> professional (Paul and I) and a complete idiot troll (you)
>>> Welcome to only the 2nd person to ever achieve membership in my
>>> disregard
>>> list
>>> Brian
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> So - I wonder where in the world you are today Mr Komar (your message
>> timed
>> at 0916 GMT - somewhat earlier in Canada?)
>>
>> Perhaps, as a competent professional, you can explain why the error
>> was/is
>> noticed when using Firefox 3.0.4. I am uncertain why you said "if you
>> used
>> a normal browser" - surely many folk now use Firefox, don't they? Is
>> it not
>> a *normal* browser?
>>
>> I appreciate that Mozilla *might* be at fault, so have submitted an
>> error
>> report accordingly [Successfully Transmitted Report
>> RMO12289055928792] Should there be an error at their end, I'm sure
>> they will correct it. I'll
>> let you know. I'm a little surprised though, that "as a competent
>> professional", you had not checked your own web site using Firefox.
>>
>> You have further confused me. How would I ever come into contact with
>> your
>> customers (so that they may have to distinguish between us?)
>> I *was* going to contact one of them, but you don't seem to have any!
>> See http://www.identit.ca/clients.html
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> --
>
> I regret to advise that I've heard nothing from Mozilla.
>
> You have still not advised what you meant by Firefox not being a
> 'normal' browser.
>
> Perhaps someone in these groups who is knowledgeable in these matters
> could comment as to why your web site appears correctly when viewed
> with IE7 but has the 'error' when viewed with Firefox.
>
> I do hope so.
>
> Dave

More than likely something in the html code is triggering IE's Quirks
mode where it ignores and continues to operate on errors unlike many
more advanced browsers. Believe FireFox, not IE if you're interested in
the maximum number of browsers being able to read the code. IE can
accept some pretty sloppy stuff whether that's good or bad is debatable
and has strong camps on both sides. The biggest downside if things that
work only in IE because of the sloppy coding in the web pages. FF has a
Quirks mode too but it's not as easy to turn on. For more detail, look
it up on google or your fav search engine.
 
Re: Browser error?

"Twayne" wrote in message
news:e5EB6dZXJHA.868@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>> Perhaps someone in these groups who is knowledgeable in these matters
>> could comment as to why your web site appears correctly when viewed
>> with IE7 but has the 'error' when viewed with Firefox.
>>
>> I do hope so.
>>
>> Dave
>
> More than likely something in the html code is triggering IE's Quirks
> mode where it ignores and continues to operate on errors unlike many
> more advanced browsers. Believe FireFox, not IE if you're interested
> in the maximum number of browsers being able to read the code. IE can
> accept some pretty sloppy stuff whether that's good or bad is
> debatable and has strong camps on both sides. The biggest downside if
> things that work only in IE because of the sloppy coding in the web
> pages. FF has a Quirks mode too but it's not as easy to turn on. For
> more detail, look it up on google or your fav search engine.
>
>
>


Thank you for your response, Twayne.

Can you actually see the error to which I referred? Did you look?

Thanks for the tip about Quirks - I'll take a look!

Enjoy your day.

Dave
 
Back
Top