On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:48:04 -0800, toasale
<toasale@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> Non-beta testers taking these blind "leaps of faith" on trying out less than
> RC/RTM packages is hazzardous to you and your unit's health. I know folks get
> hungry for the latest and greatest, but pulleezzee leave it to the more
> experienced.
You're replying to the wrong person and preaching to the choir. I'm
not the one running the beta version, and you're repeating what I've
said many times in these newsgroups.
> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 06:32:01 -0800, GarethTaylor
> > <GarethTaylor@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I cannot believe how rude everyone seems to be on this newsgroup.
> >
> >
> > First, let me point out that you have gotten replies from a handful of
> > people. Please do not generalize from that handful to "everyone on
> > this newsgroup."
> >
> >
> > > Firstly, nearly everyone who replied assumes I am a user with no knoweledge
> > > of the risk associated with Beta software and feels they need to warn me in a
> > > partonising manner.
> >
> >
> > Let me point out two things:
> >
> > 1. You didn't tell us that you had any knowledge at all, and from your
> > initial message, it sounded like you were probably a beginner. Even if
> > you weren't a beginner, when replying to a newsgroup message, it's
> > always safest to assume very little knowledge, simply because that's
> > often the case.
> >
> > 2. You said you installed SP3. SP3 doesn't exist yet, and what you
> > installed was a beta version (or RC1) of SP3. Since you simply said
> > "SP3," without saying something like "SP3 RC1," it's a perfectly
> > reasonable assumption that you didn't even realize that it's a beta.
> >
> > What you call "a partonising manner" was mostly people trying to help
> > and protect you in an area that it appeared you might know nothing
> > about.
> >
> >
> > > Secondly, although this may be a public newsgroup I did arrive here by
> > > clicking a link within Technet which said "managed newsgroups". On server
> > > related issues people seem a little more friendly.
> >
> >
> > Many people here read hundreds of messages in these newsgroups every
> > day and reply to dozens of them. Replies are often short and sweet,
> > and to the point, simply because there is little time to help people
> > and also add pleasantries to the messages. That's simply a fact of
> > life, and has nothing to do with people being rude or unfriendly.
> >
> > Despite what I say in the paragraph above, you *did* get at least one
> > particularly rude messages. We are all individuals here, and it's
> > certainly true that there are some who are rude (or even worse). But
> > once again, please do not ascribe one person's rudeness to all of us.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
> >
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup