On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 14:40:28 -0400, "Johnny"
<nospamcandj01@mindspring.com> wrote:
> Thank you.
You're welcome. Glad to help.
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.am.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:82qf83hbksg71q3epqe5680an4c32gu8vc@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 12:54:35 -0400, "Johnny"
> > <nospamcandj01@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >
> >> When installing more memory in windows XP home do you need to do a repair
> >> install
> >
> >
> > No.
> >
> >
> >> Or will windows just see it?
> >
> >
> > If your motherboard accepts it and you put the right type in, and you
> > do it correctly, yes.
> >
> >
> >> With memory so cheap I have 2G. But
> >> with memory so cheap I was thinking about putting in 2G more.
> >
> >
> > Why? Regardless of how cheap it is, unless you run particularly
> > memory-hungry applications it will do *nothing* for you. In fact, for
> > the great majority of people, even the 2GB you already have is much
> > more than necessary. My guess is that if you reduced it to 1GB (or
> > maybe even 512MB) you couldn't tell the difference.
> >
> > You often hear people saying that more memory is better, but that's
> > true only up to a point.Beyond that point (and you're probably already
> > way beyond it), more memory doesn't hurt, but it doesn't help either.
> > More memory helps only when what you are running causes you to use the
> > page file instead of RAM. If you're in that situation, adding RAM
> > reduces (or eliminates) page file use, and speeds up performance.
> > If you're not in that situation, the RAM does next to nothing for you.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup