Nonny wrote:
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:35:56 -0600, "Bill in Co."
> <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> Nonny wrote:
>>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 14:14:20 -0600, "Bill in Co."
>>> <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nonny wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 00:58:04 -0600, "Bill in Co."
>>>>> <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nonny wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 31 May 2008 23:29:56 -0600, "Bill in Co."
>>>>>>> <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> it. I sure wouldn't trust it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I don't know, as I disabled that part. Don't need it. I watch
>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> go when I'm online (which is only when I dial up).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Might just as well uninstall it then. It's not doing you any good
>>>>>>> with recent innovations with worms, virii, etc.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, those who get their kicks writing those kind of
>>>>>>> things
>>>>>>> don't live in the past like you do.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's doing me good, as it's catchin the old stuff (if there even is
>>>>>> any,
>>>>>> coming in).
>>>>>
>>>>> Another one of your "right tool for the job" examples??
>>>>>
>>>>> Good for you. You like old stuff.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not out to try and keep up with the Joneses, like you evidently
>>>> are.
>>>
>>> Nope... just like to keep up to date. I also like to read the daily
>>> news at several sites, rather than wait to read it in my Sunday paper
>>> or my monthly magazine.
>>>
>>>> Or have to have the "latest and greatest" (snort). (which is, in
>>>> reality,
>>>> just a bunch of hype for the newbies).
>>>
>>> You've expressed your opinion on this more than once. I doubt that
>>> anyone is influenced by it. All you are doing is exposing yourself as
>>> being someone who doesn't like anything "new".
>>
>> Nope. I have one of the best models of flash mp3 players out there.
>> Try
>> again?
>> Black and white thinking.
>>
>>> I'm surprised you haven't asked anyone how you might downgrade your
>>> new Dell to 98SE.
>>>
>>> I really am.
>>
>> I don't have to. I have it right over here, on the other computer.
>> But
>> you go right ahead, and keep on insisting on having the "latest and
>> greatest" (like SP3 - snort). mooo, mooo (or is it, baaa, baaa?)
>> (aka:
>> aka: just follow the sheep and the yellow dashed lines on your way
>> out... )
>
> FYI ad-hominem usage doesn't elevate your status in a discussion. It
> merely exposes you for what you really are.
I think if you look back, you'll see that you have directly or indirectly
engaged in such activities yourself. What does that say? Some
projection noted.