Windows 2000 Hard Drive

  • Thread starter Thread starter MichaelN
  • Start date Start date
M

MichaelN

I have an old computer with 2 hard drives running Windows 2000. I
believe they are both SCSI.

My C: drive is a Healthy Boot NTFS (Disk 0) and working fine. It is
only 9.32 GB. I said it was old!

My other drive (Disk 1) is the problem. Part of it is Healthy
(active) with a primary partition of 9.32 GB. It is mirroring my c:
drive. It has no drive letter assigned to it.

The rest of the Disk 1 drive is 47.9 GB and contains some important
storage files that I would like to access (but not enough to spend the
$$$ for data recovery, as I have backups of the important ones). It
used to be my d: drive, but something happened and it no longer shows
up in Windows Explorer. Computer Management shows it is Unallocated.

Anyway, the files are still there, according to R-Studio. Does anyone
know how I should partition/ assign a drive letter so I can access the
files in Windows Explorer, or at least make the unallocated portion of
the drive accessible again?

Thanks in advance.
 
Please use cross-posting when addressing several newsgroups:
http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm


"MichaelN" <mrnevarez@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:osm5p3d5af7lh2hhnmnaraj0nlkfpqbper@4ax.com...
>I have an old computer with 2 hard drives running Windows 2000. I
> believe they are both SCSI.
>
> My C: drive is a Healthy Boot NTFS (Disk 0) and working fine. It is
> only 9.32 GB. I said it was old!
>
> My other drive (Disk 1) is the problem. Part of it is Healthy
> (active) with a primary partition of 9.32 GB. It is mirroring my c:
> drive. It has no drive letter assigned to it.
>
> The rest of the Disk 1 drive is 47.9 GB and contains some important
> storage files that I would like to access (but not enough to spend the
> $$$ for data recovery, as I have backups of the important ones). It
> used to be my d: drive, but something happened and it no longer shows
> up in Windows Explorer. Computer Management shows it is Unallocated.
>
> Anyway, the files are still there, according to R-Studio. Does anyone
> know how I should partition/ assign a drive letter so I can access the
> files in Windows Explorer, or at least make the unallocated portion of
> the drive accessible again?
>
> Thanks in advance.
 
MichaelN wrote:

> Anyway, the files are still there, according to R-Studio. Does anyone
> know how I should partition/ assign a drive letter so I can access the
> files in Windows Explorer, or at least make the unallocated portion of
> the drive accessible again?

If it's showing as "unallocated" I'm not sure if you can safely turn it
into a formatted partition and get the data back.

You might want to try a file recovery program such as the freeware:

http://www.pcinspector.de/Sites/file_recovery/download.htm?language=1#

I had a similar problem recently and this recovered 90% of my files.
 
Great! Thank you very much. I'll try that.

btw, do you have any suggestions on how to make the unallocated space
useable again?


On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:19:25 -0500, Sid Elbow <here@there.com> wrote:

>MichaelN wrote:
>
>> Anyway, the files are still there, according to R-Studio. Does anyone
>> know how I should partition/ assign a drive letter so I can access the
>> files in Windows Explorer, or at least make the unallocated portion of
>> the drive accessible again?
>
>If it's showing as "unallocated" I'm not sure if you can safely turn it
>into a formatted partition and get the data back.
>
>You might want to try a file recovery program such as the freeware:
>
>http://www.pcinspector.de/Sites/file_recovery/download.htm?language=1#
>
>I had a similar problem recently and this recovered 90% of my files.
 
Michael Nevarez wrote:
> Great! Thank you very much. I'll try that.
>
> btw, do you have any suggestions on how to make the unallocated space
> useable again?

You can go into Disk Management (R-click My Computer, select <Manage>,
select >Disk management>). It should show up as unallocated space and
you should be able to create and format a partition which will recover
the space.

However, doing that will basically lose any files that may still be on
it so you want to exhaust all possibilities for file recovery first.
 
On Jan 19, 7:27 pm, MichaelN <mrneva...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> I have an old computer with 2 hard drives running Windows 2000. I
> believe they are both SCSI.
>
> My C: drive is a Healthy Boot NTFS (Disk 0) and working fine. It is
> only 9.32 GB. I said it was old!
>
> My other drive (Disk 1) is the problem. Part of it is Healthy
> (active) with a primary partition of 9.32 GB. It is mirroring my c:
> drive. It has no drive letter assigned to it.
>
> The rest of the Disk 1 drive is 47.9 GB and contains some important
> storage files that I would like to access (but not enough to spend the
> $$$ for data recovery, as I have backups of the important ones). It
> used to be my d: drive, but something happened and it no longer shows
> up in Windows Explorer. Computer Management shows it is Unallocated.
>
> Anyway, the files are still there, according to R-Studio. Does anyone
> know how I should partition/ assign a drive letter so I can access the
> files in Windows Explorer, or at least make the unallocated portion of
> the drive accessible again?
>
> Thanks in advance.

MichaelN: A better freeware for your problem might be Testdisk 6.7:

http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk_6.7_Release

It's written specifically to recover lost partitions. It worked great
for me restoring large-capacity disks corrupted by not having
EnableBigLBA installed in my W2K system. Runs in command mode.

PCFile Recovery and the numerous other file recovery programs focus
only on retrieving files inadvertently deleted by the user, and
typically can't find files inside a lost partition.
 
zeke7 wrote:

> PCFile Recovery and the numerous other file recovery programs focus
> only on retrieving files inadvertently deleted by the user, and
> typically can't find files inside a lost partition.

PC Inspector will find lost/deleted/damaged partitions and the files
they contain which was precisely why I recommended it in this instance.
 
Back
Top