Expect annoying cookie-planter Double Click to change name: US regsclear Google/DC deal

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor
  • Start date Start date
T

Taylor

"Google Watch" (stop this company from becoming evil):
http://wreckingboy.livejournal.com/318545.html

Daily News Thursday, December 20, 2007
U.S. Regulators Clear Google-DoubleClick Deal


The U.S. Federal Trade Commission antitrust regulators have approved
Google Inc.'s $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick Inc.

"After carefully reviewing the evidence, we have concluded that
Google's proposed acquisition of DoubleClick is unlikely to
substantially lessen competition," the Federal Trade Commission said
Thursday in a statement cited by Associated Press.

The deal is still under review in Europe; it was first proposed last
April, and it described a combination of Google's leading position in
online text ads with DoubleClick's ad-serving tools.

The five-member commission voted 4-1 in favor of the deal.
Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour dissented "because I make alternate
predictions about where this market is heading, and the transformative
role the combined Google/DoubleClick will play if the proposed
acquisition is consummated."

Even before receiving approval, the deal had many industry observers
and online privacy advocates concerned over its potential
implications.

In a release from the U.S.-based Center for Digital Democracy,
Executive Director Jeff Chester stated:

"The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sidestepped its responsibility
today when it approved the merger of two companies whose new, extended
data-collection reach will give it unprecedented access to track our
every move throughout the digital landscape. By permitting Google to
combine the personal details, gleaned from our searches online and
YouTube downloads, with the vast repository of information collected
by DoubleClick, the FTC has sanctioned the creation of a new digital
data colossus.

The FTC is supposed to protect the privacy of Americans in the digital
age. The excuse offered by the majority of the commission--that
consumer privacy can't be addressed by current antitrust law--reveals
a lack of leadership and determination to protect U.S. consumers. It's
clear that this merger--and the ones that follow--will be about
companies creating the twenty-first-century's equivalent of railroad,
steel, and oil
monopolies in the past. The FTC was created to protect Americans from
the dangers of such monopolies, something the agency failed to do
today.

"Despite the FTC's claims, privacy is most certainly an anti-trust
issue. A key component of the online market dominance that companies
such as Google have achieved is the aggregation and analysis of
consumer profiles, including the merger of far-flung data sets and
vast data warehouses that only a handful of companies now have at
their disposal.

"Since the merger was announced, CDD has provided abundant evidence to
the
FTC that Google will now be able to extend still further its market
dominance over online advertising. But several commissioners
mistakenly believe that we are still living back in the dot-com boom
of the 1990s, when barriers to market entry were low. Its analysis of
the market is flawed. With today's decision, the FTC is helping ensure
that U.S.
consumers will have to live under the shadow of an even bigger digital
giant, with a privacy time bomb ticking in the background."

Having side-stepped its responsibility to protect both competition and
privacy, advocates will press the European Commission to impose the
necessary safeguards on the proposed Google acquisition of
DoubleClick. Congress too will need to conduct oversight hearings into
how the FTC conducted this merger review. Staff privacy principles put
out for
comment is not a substitution for adopting specific safeguards for
this merger.

The CDD especially commends Commissioner Pamela Harbour, who dissented
today,
for her insightful and independent critique. Commissioner Jon
Leibowitz also raised the critical privacy issues in his thoughtful
separate statement."
 
Re: Expect annoying cookie-planter Double Click to change name: US regs clear Google/DC deal

You don't need to put up with Doubleclick's
tracking. If you don't already use a HOSTS file,
go here:

Win95/98/ME: C:\Windows
WinNT4/2000: C:\WINNT\System32\Drivers\Etc
WinXP: C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc

Look for a file named HOSTS. It's not hosts.txt, etc.
Just HOSTS. If not there, create it in Notepad.
Put this line hear the top:

127.0.0.1 localhost

Then add the following:

127.0.0.1 www.doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.com
127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.com
127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net
127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.net

Then save the file.
The HOSTS file dates back to the early days of
the Internet. It's basically a private phone book.
When you go to www.somewhere.com in a browser,
the browser first looks up the URL in your HOSTS
file to see if you have the actual address (IP address)
of the website. If it's in the HOSTS file the browser
will look no further. (It won't call a DNS online.)

127.0.0.1 is your own machine.

So the lines above tell the browser that doubleclick
is on your own machine and therefore the browser
never contacts doubleclick.

You can do the same for any URL, easily removing
most ads, tracking cookies, and web bugs with just
a few lines.

If you search online you'll find sample lists of ad
servers and trackers to put into a HOSTS file.



> http://wreckingboy.livejournal.com/318545.html
>
> Daily News Thursday, December 20, 2007
> U.S. Regulators Clear Google-DoubleClick Deal
>
>
> The U.S. Federal Trade Commission antitrust regulators have approved
> Google Inc.'s $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick Inc.
>
> "After carefully reviewing the evidence, we have concluded that
> Google's proposed acquisition of DoubleClick is unlikely to
> substantially lessen competition," the Federal Trade Commission said
> Thursday in a statement cited by Associated Press.
>
> The deal is still under review in Europe; it was first proposed last
> April, and it described a combination of Google's leading position in
> online text ads with DoubleClick's ad-serving tools.
>
> The five-member commission voted 4-1 in favor of the deal.
> Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour dissented "because I make alternate
> predictions about where this market is heading, and the transformative
> role the combined Google/DoubleClick will play if the proposed
> acquisition is consummated."
>
> Even before receiving approval, the deal had many industry observers
> and online privacy advocates concerned over its potential
> implications.
>
> In a release from the U.S.-based Center for Digital Democracy,
> Executive Director Jeff Chester stated:
>
> "The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sidestepped its responsibility
> today when it approved the merger of two companies whose new, extended
> data-collection reach will give it unprecedented access to track our
> every move throughout the digital landscape. By permitting Google to
> combine the personal details, gleaned from our searches online and
> YouTube downloads, with the vast repository of information collected
> by DoubleClick, the FTC has sanctioned the creation of a new digital
> data colossus.
>
> The FTC is supposed to protect the privacy of Americans in the digital
> age. The excuse offered by the majority of the commission--that
> consumer privacy can't be addressed by current antitrust law--reveals
> a lack of leadership and determination to protect U.S. consumers. It's
> clear that this merger--and the ones that follow--will be about
> companies creating the twenty-first-century's equivalent of railroad,
> steel, and oil
> monopolies in the past. The FTC was created to protect Americans from
> the dangers of such monopolies, something the agency failed to do
> today.
>
> "Despite the FTC's claims, privacy is most certainly an anti-trust
> issue. A key component of the online market dominance that companies
> such as Google have achieved is the aggregation and analysis of
> consumer profiles, including the merger of far-flung data sets and
> vast data warehouses that only a handful of companies now have at
> their disposal.
>
> "Since the merger was announced, CDD has provided abundant evidence to
> the
> FTC that Google will now be able to extend still further its market
> dominance over online advertising. But several commissioners
> mistakenly believe that we are still living back in the dot-com boom
> of the 1990s, when barriers to market entry were low. Its analysis of
> the market is flawed. With today's decision, the FTC is helping ensure
> that U.S.
> consumers will have to live under the shadow of an even bigger digital
> giant, with a privacy time bomb ticking in the background."
>
> Having side-stepped its responsibility to protect both competition and
> privacy, advocates will press the European Commission to impose the
> necessary safeguards on the proposed Google acquisition of
> DoubleClick. Congress too will need to conduct oversight hearings into
> how the FTC conducted this merger review. Staff privacy principles put
> out for
> comment is not a substitution for adopting specific safeguards for
> this merger.
>
> The CDD especially commends Commissioner Pamela Harbour, who dissented
> today,
> for her insightful and independent critique. Commissioner Jon
> Leibowitz also raised the critical privacy issues in his thoughtful
> separate statement."
 
Re: Expect annoying cookie-planter Double Click to change name: US regs clear Google/DC deal

mayayana wrote:
> You don't need to put up with Doubleclick's
> tracking. If you don't already use a HOSTS file,
> go here:
>
> Win95/98/ME: C:\Windows
> WinNT4/2000: C:\WINNT\System32\Drivers\Etc
> WinXP: C:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc
>
> Look for a file named HOSTS. It's not hosts.txt, etc.
> Just HOSTS. If not there, create it in Notepad.
> Put this line hear the top:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
>
> Then add the following:
>
> 127.0.0.1 www.doubleclick.net
> 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.net
> 127.0.0.1 ad.doubleclick.com
> 127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.com
> 127.0.0.1 doubleclick.net
> 127.0.0.1 ads.doubleclick.net
>
> Then save the file.
> The HOSTS file dates back to the early days of
> the Internet. It's basically a private phone book.
> When you go to www.somewhere.com in a browser,
> the browser first looks up the URL in your HOSTS
> file to see if you have the actual address (IP
> address)
> of the website. If it's in the HOSTS file the browser
> will look no further. (It won't call a DNS online.)
>
> 127.0.0.1 is your own machine.
>
> So the lines above tell the browser that doubleclick
> is on your own machine and therefore the browser
> never contacts doubleclick.
>
> You can do the same for any URL, easily removing
> most ads, tracking cookies, and web bugs with just
> a few lines.
>
> If you search online you'll find sample lists of ad
> servers and trackers to put into a HOSTS file.
>
>
>
>> http://wreckingboy.livejournal.com/318545.html
>>
>> Daily News Thursday, December 20, 2007
>> U.S. Regulators Clear Google-DoubleClick Deal
>>
>>
>> The U.S. Federal Trade Commission antitrust
>> regulators
>> have approved Google Inc.'s $3.1 billion purchase of
>> DoubleClick Inc.
>>
>> "After carefully reviewing the evidence, we have
>> concluded that Google's proposed acquisition of
>> DoubleClick is unlikely to substantially lessen
>> competition," the Federal Trade Commission said
>> Thursday
>> in a statement cited by Associated Press.
>>
>> The deal is still under review in Europe; it was
>> first
>> proposed last April, and it described a combination
>> of
>> Google's leading position in online text ads with
>> DoubleClick's ad-serving tools.
>>
>> The five-member commission voted 4-1 in favor of the
>> deal. Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour dissented
>> "because I make alternate predictions about where
>> this
>> market is heading, and the transformative role the
>> combined Google/DoubleClick will play if the
>> proposed
>> acquisition is consummated."
>>
>> Even before receiving approval, the deal had many
>> industry observers and online privacy advocates
>> concerned over its potential implications.
>>
>> In a release from the U.S.-based Center for Digital
>> Democracy, Executive Director Jeff Chester stated:
>>
>> "The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sidestepped its
>> responsibility today when it approved the merger of
>> two
>> companies whose new, extended data-collection reach
>> will
>> give it unprecedented access to track our every move
>> throughout the digital landscape. By permitting
>> Google
>> to combine the personal details, gleaned from our
>> searches online and YouTube downloads, with the vast
>> repository of information collected by DoubleClick,
>> the
>> FTC has sanctioned the creation of a new digital
>> data
>> colossus.
>>
>> The FTC is supposed to protect the privacy of
>> Americans
>> in the digital age. The excuse offered by the
>> majority
>> of the commission--that consumer privacy can't be
>> addressed by current antitrust law--reveals a lack
>> of
>> leadership and determination to protect U.S.
>> consumers.
>> It's clear that this merger--and the ones that
>> follow--will be about companies creating the
>> twenty-first-century's equivalent of railroad,
>> steel,
>> and oil
>> monopolies in the past. The FTC was created to
>> protect
>> Americans from the dangers of such monopolies,
>> something
>> the agency failed to do today.
>>
>> "Despite the FTC's claims, privacy is most certainly
>> an
>> anti-trust issue. A key component of the online
>> market
>> dominance that companies such as Google have
>> achieved is
>> the aggregation and analysis of consumer profiles,
>> including the merger of far-flung data sets and vast
>> data warehouses that only a handful of companies now
>> have at their disposal.
>>
>> "Since the merger was announced, CDD has provided
>> abundant evidence to the
>> FTC that Google will now be able to extend still
>> further
>> its market dominance over online advertising. But
>> several commissioners mistakenly believe that we are
>> still living back in the dot-com boom of the 1990s,
>> when
>> barriers to market entry were low. Its analysis of
>> the
>> market is flawed. With today's decision, the FTC is
>> helping ensure that U.S.
>> consumers will have to live under the shadow of an
>> even
>> bigger digital giant, with a privacy time bomb
>> ticking
>> in the background."
>>
>> Having side-stepped its responsibility to protect
>> both
>> competition and privacy, advocates will press the
>> European Commission to impose the necessary
>> safeguards
>> on the proposed Google acquisition of DoubleClick.
>> Congress too will need to conduct oversight hearings
>> into how the FTC conducted this merger review. Staff
>> privacy principles put out for
>> comment is not a substitution for adopting specific
>> safeguards for this merger.
>>
>> The CDD especially commends Commissioner Pamela
>> Harbour,
>> who dissented today,
>> for her insightful and independent critique.
>> Commissioner Jon Leibowitz also raised the critical
>> privacy issues in his thoughtful separate
>> statement."


If they change the name, as is likely, that won't help
anything. Gotta wait to see what the name will be.
NBD really; it'll be obvious enough once it happens.
Many will post it, I'm sure.

Or, download an updated HOSTS file from MVP.org or
wherever they have the updated info, when the time
comes. NBD, really.
 
Back
Top