Gerry wrote:
> How do internal drive read / write speeds typically compare with
> those of a USB external drive?
Shenan Stanley wrote:
> The drive(s) themselves (inside the box that makes them USB
> accessible) are the same as the drive(s) you would buy to put
> inside your PC. So the difference would be due to the interface
> (USB 1.1/2.0/etc), the drive the manufacturer decided to put inside
> the box and your computer specs in some ways.
Gerry wrote:
> Given that the drives are identical then an external USB set up
> will be slower?
>
> Why do many users install external drives when there is a spare
> internal slot. At least that is my impression, perhaps mistaken,
> that this commonly is the case.
USB 2.0 and 1394 are quick interfaces, but keep in mind that they are not as
fast as a SATA or ATA interface. In general - yes - an internal hard disk
drive will have the capability of being faster than an external hard disk
drive (given identical hard disk drives are utilized in the tests.)
Let's compare the maximum *possible* performance of each interface.
-- USB 1.1 - 12 Mbits/sec
-- USB 2.0 - 480 Mbits/sec
-- USB 3.0 - 4.8Gbits/sec
-- 1394a - 400 Mbits/sec
-- 1394b - 800 Mbits/sec
-- UltraATA 100 - 100 Mbytes/sec
-- SATA - 1.5 Gbits/sec
-- SATA II - 3.0 Gbits/sec
So - why do people get external hard disk drives? (USB 3.0 is not available
that I know of yet - but, yeah - that one might be faster than the rest when
it comes out. hah)
A few possibilities run through my skull.
- Easy. Most people may not even think about opening their computer case.
- Portable media. Maybe they want to carry it someplace.
- External to the computer backups. It's easier to grab that external hard
drive you back up to regularly and get out than get the entire computer.
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html