<ham@123.net> wrote in message
news:j5a5u31260p0cceil6uegunin759vorqmf@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:04:39 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <test@dev.null>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>No version of Vista with Home in the name has that function, just like
>>ntbackup with ASR doesn't work on any version of XP with Home in the name.
>>
>>If you want imaging, imaging and cloning programs like TrueImage and Ghost
>>are a better bet. I've used TrueImage for some time now and it's been
>>very
>>reliable, and it's around $50.
>>
>>HTH
>>-pk
>
>
> Then just what does the "Home" version of Vista back up?
>
> ham
It backs up User Data. It *may* back up other files too, but that may not
be particularly helpful. For example, there's little to no point in
backing up Windows or Program files if you have to reinstall Windows and
programs anyway in case of drive crash.
It can't create a backup that you can actually use to restore to a new drive
and recreate the entire environment, that is, create a bootable Windows
drive at the state when the backup was taken. That function is restricted
to Vista Business and Ultimate, just as the same functions were limited in
XP Home vs. Pro.
(In that case, however, the UI in ntbackup could lead you to think it *was*
supported, and more than a few people posted wondering what they were doing
wrong when the process failed. The KB article was misleading on this,
giving a "workaround" for XP Home that ended with the caveat that it would
fail on XP Home as it isn't supported).
Instead, you would have to do an OS install first, reinstall the apps, and
then restore your data.
If this isn't sufficient, and for many it isn't, there are 3rd party apps as
mentioned that work well and are not expensive.
And for myself, that's what I use.
Finally, don't rely on a single copy of your backup (keep one offsite) and
do perform test restores to verify that the backup actually works.
HTH
-pk