On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 16:14:04 -0500, "Lil' Dave"
<spamyourself@virus.net> wrote:
>"Bill in Co." <not_really_here@earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:O8RTE4uwIHA.5620@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>> Lil' Dave wrote:
>>> "§Chrissi§" <anubisofthydeath@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:enoigDowIHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I have a dell PC with Windows XP (SP2). The hard drive is too small
>>>> (40GB). Can I copy all the files from it to a new hard drive and then
>>>> replace it with the new hard drive? Can I still keep the license of XP?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>
>>>> Chriss.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The 40 GB drive sets a flag in my mind. Your bios may not comprehend any
>>> current hard drive past 120GB in capacity (137GB is they made one that
>>> size).
>>
>> I'm just curious why you assumed this. (He may just have had a smaller 40
>> GB drive, and that's all there was to it).
>>
>>> XP understands and perceives drives over that capacity. However,
>>> partitioning must occur on a PC with bios that supports such larger
>>> capacity
>>> drives if made by XP. Similar with imaging and cloning software. Once
>>> done
>>> on such a PC, can be moved to a PC with non-supporting bios for such HD
>>> capacity. At least that has been my experiences....
>>> --
>>> Dave
>>
>>
>
>Generally, in this newsgroup, they go for larger size, and, most don't
>select anything relatively "small" of today's availability of hard drive
>capacity.
BinCo would call that person a "sheep" (baa-baa) or someone who is
trying to "keep up with the Joneses".
>What would you assume? If, not agreeing with my assumption what
>is your appropriate reply, and why?
>
>BTW If the OP is doing something different than my assumption, he/she has
>opportunity to reply to same as well.