ANY reason not to turn off System Restore for non-boot drives?

[a2mgoog@yahoo.com]

If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
partitions? Thank you.

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

<a2mgoog@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3f471541-db09-4877-aa04-f9c5105a9963@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> partitions? Thank you.

If your system files / program files are all on the system
partition then you don't need System Restore for the
other partitions.

 

[Gordon]

a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:

> If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> partitions? Thank you.

Only if you have SYSTEM files on that drive....System Restore only monitors
SYSTEM files...

 

[a2mgoog@yahoo.com]

On Dec 30, 10:33 am, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@fly.com.oz> wrote:
> If your system files / program files are all on the system
> partition then you don't need System Restore for the
> other partitions.

Program files? What program files? Are you saying that if I install
Paintshop Pro on my G: drive that System Restore will back it up?
Thank you.

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

<a2mgoog@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:37a58b1c-2a94-4888-8ee7-6af9151a48c5@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 30, 10:33 am, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@fly.com.oz> wrote:
>> If your system files / program files are all on the system
>> partition then you don't need System Restore for the
>> other partitions.
>
> Program files? What program files? Are you saying that if I install
> Paintshop Pro on my G: drive that System Restore will back it up?
> Thank you.

I suspect it will but I'm not sure. Give it a try:
1. Install some program on drive G:.
2. Create a Restore Point.
3. Uninstall the program.
4. Use System Restore.
Is the program back again?

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:

> If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> partitions?



No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.


--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:19:33 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
<kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:

> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> > only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> > reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> > points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> > have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> > there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> > partitions?
>
>
>
> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.


By the way, one more point. 10GB is very small for the C: partition.
Especially with such a large drive, I would make it substantially
bigger--50GB or even more.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:ur2gn313k0e2ptd508soc8cfao2imorgh4@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:19:33 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
> <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> > If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
>> > only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
>> > reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
>> > points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
>> > have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
>> > there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
>> > partitions?
>>
>>
>>
>> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.
>
>
> By the way, one more point. 10GB is very small for the C: partition.
> Especially with such a large drive, I would make it substantially
> bigger--50GB or even more.
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
including various sound and picture processing programs and
lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.

 

[a2mgoog@yahoo.com]

On Dec 30, 1:46 pm, "Pegasus \(MVP\)" <I....@fly.com.oz> wrote:
> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.


I keep My Documents and the paging file on separate partitions, and
like you, I've never needed more than 10GB.

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:46:08 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
<I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:

>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:ur2gn313k0e2ptd508soc8cfao2imorgh4@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:19:33 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
> > <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> >> > only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> >> > reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> >> > points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> >> > have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> >> > there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> >> > partitions?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.
> >
> >
> > By the way, one more point. 10GB is very small for the C: partition.
> > Especially with such a large drive, I would make it substantially
> > bigger--50GB or even more.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>
> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
>

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:46:08 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
<I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:

>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:ur2gn313k0e2ptd508soc8cfao2imorgh4@4ax.com...
> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:19:33 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
> > <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>
> >> > If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
> >> > only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
> >> > reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
> >> > points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
> >> > have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
> >> > there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
> >> > partitions?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.
> >
> >
> > By the way, one more point. 10GB is very small for the C: partition.
> > Especially with such a large drive, I would make it substantially
> > bigger--50GB or even more.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>
> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.


Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
(no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
upgrade to in the future.

In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Pegasus \(MVP\)]

"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:gl8gn35ob0r0ma038f923rh1fdu6ipl8eu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:46:08 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
> <I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>> news:ur2gn313k0e2ptd508soc8cfao2imorgh4@4ax.com...
>> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 14:19:33 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
>> > <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
>> >> > only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
>> >> > reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
>> >> > points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
>> >> > have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
>> >> > there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
>> >> > partitions?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.
>> >
>> >
>> > By the way, one more point. 10GB is very small for the C: partition.
>> > Especially with such a large drive, I would make it substantially
>> > bigger--50GB or even more.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>
>> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
>> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
>> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
>> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
>> including various sound and picture processing programs and
>> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
>
>
> Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
> (no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
> for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
> upgrade to in the future.
>
> In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

56 GBytes is huge. It would be interesting to see the space
profile on your system partition. Here is mine. The first number
represents "bytes", the second "files".
0 0 C:\My Download Files
85 2 C:\Recycled
69,362 48 C:\RECYCLER
377,040 1 C:\Config.Msi
38,482,686 329 C:\MYOB105
175,243,430 1,822 C:\Documents and Settings
232,892,982 98 C:\MSOCache
778,841,422 10 C:\
1,538,539,221 13,564 C:\Program Files
1,663,555,395 2,991 C:\System Volume Information
3,553,344,512 18,644 C:\WINDOWS
7,981,346,135 37,509 (Total)

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:22:44 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
<I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:

>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:gl8gn35ob0r0ma038f923rh1fdu6ipl8eu@4ax.com...

> >> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> >> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> >> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> >> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> >> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> >> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
> >
> >
> > Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
> > (no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
> > for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
> > upgrade to in the future.
> >
> > In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> > partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>
> 56 GBytes is huge. It would be interesting to see the space
> profile on your system partition. Here is mine. The first number
> represents "bytes", the second "files".
> 0 0 C:\My Download Files
> 85 2 C:\Recycled
> 69,362 48 C:\RECYCLER
> 377,040 1 C:\Config.Msi
> 38,482,686 329 C:\MYOB105
> 175,243,430 1,822 C:\Documents and Settings
> 232,892,982 98 C:\MSOCache
> 778,841,422 10 C:\
> 1,538,539,221 13,564 C:\Program Files
> 1,663,555,395 2,991 C:\System Volume Information
> 3,553,344,512 18,644 C:\WINDOWS
> 7,981,346,135 37,509 (Total)


Without going into great detail, the great majority of it is in two
folders: \Windows and \Users

Ken
>

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:49:22 -0700, "Ken Blake, MVP"
<kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:

> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:22:44 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
> <I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> > news:gl8gn35ob0r0ma038f923rh1fdu6ipl8eu@4ax.com...
>
> > >> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> > >> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> > >> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> > >> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> > >> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> > >> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
> > >
> > >
> > > Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
> > > (no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
> > > for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
> > > upgrade to in the future.
> > >
> > > In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> > > partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
> >
> > 56 GBytes is huge. It would be interesting to see the space
> > profile on your system partition. Here is mine. The first number
> > represents "bytes", the second "files".
> > 0 0 C:\My Download Files
> > 85 2 C:\Recycled
> > 69,362 48 C:\RECYCLER
> > 377,040 1 C:\Config.Msi
> > 38,482,686 329 C:\MYOB105
> > 175,243,430 1,822 C:\Documents and Settings
> > 232,892,982 98 C:\MSOCache
> > 778,841,422 10 C:\
> > 1,538,539,221 13,564 C:\Program Files
> > 1,663,555,395 2,991 C:\System Volume Information
> > 3,553,344,512 18,644 C:\WINDOWS
> > 7,981,346,135 37,509 (Total)
>
>
> Without going into great detail, the great majority of it is in two
> folders: \Windows and \Users


Sorry--and also \Program Files. \Program Files alone is over 8GB

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[R. McCarty]

Vista has a significantly larger footprint because of the folder \WinSxS
in the Windows folder tree. A standard install will have around 4.0
Gigabytes of data inside WinSxS. Side-by-Side is the methodology to
prevent the DllHell issue that has affected previous Windows versions.

"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:ehbgn3557lajevk7cavdvh1osudppbpmi7@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:22:44 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
> <I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
>> news:gl8gn35ob0r0ma038f923rh1fdu6ipl8eu@4ax.com...
>
>> >> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
>> >> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
>> >> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
>> >> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
>> >> including various sound and picture processing programs and
>> >> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
>> >
>> >
>> > Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
>> > (no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
>> > for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
>> > upgrade to in the future.
>> >
>> > In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
>> > partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
>> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>>
>> 56 GBytes is huge. It would be interesting to see the space
>> profile on your system partition. Here is mine. The first number
>> represents "bytes", the second "files".
>> 0 0 C:\My Download Files
>> 85 2 C:\Recycled
>> 69,362 48 C:\RECYCLER
>> 377,040 1 C:\Config.Msi
>> 38,482,686 329 C:\MYOB105
>> 175,243,430 1,822 C:\Documents and Settings
>> 232,892,982 98 C:\MSOCache
>> 778,841,422 10 C:\
>> 1,538,539,221 13,564 C:\Program Files
>> 1,663,555,395 2,991 C:\System Volume Information
>> 3,553,344,512 18,644 C:\WINDOWS
>> 7,981,346,135 37,509 (Total)
>
>
> Without going into great detail, the great majority of it is in two
> folders: \Windows and \Users
>
> Ken
>>
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[a2mgoog@yahoo.com]

On Dec 30, 3:04 pm, "Ken Blake, MVP"
<kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
> In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.


Well, I don't look at it as restricting myself, I look at it as making
it much faster to do backups and restores. I do have 25 GB reserved
for the C drive in case I ever need it, with currently 10GB allocated
to C, and 15 unused. The Acronis software makes it a snap to
reallocate the used/unused if I run out of room, but in the last five
years I haven't needed more than 10GB.

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:58:21 -0500, "R. McCarty"
<PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> wrote:

> Vista has a significantly larger footprint because of the folder \WinSxS
> in the Windows folder tree.


Which is why I pointed out that restricting the size of the system
partition to a low number is not wise. The operating system you run
today is not necessarily the one you will be running tomorrow.



> A standard install will have around 4.0
> Gigabytes of data inside WinSxS. Side-by-Side is the methodology to
> prevent the DllHell issue that has affected previous Windows versions.
>
> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> news:ehbgn3557lajevk7cavdvh1osudppbpmi7@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:22:44 +0100, "Pegasus \(MVP\)"
> > <I.can@fly.com.oz> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
> >> news:gl8gn35ob0r0ma038f923rh1fdu6ipl8eu@4ax.com...
> >
> >> >> In my experience 20 GBytes is generous for a system partition,
> >> >> even for a server, as long all user data is kept on a separate
> >> >> partition. My current system partition for WinXP Professional
> >> >> requires just 8 GBytes. It is fully loaded with the usual apps
> >> >> including various sound and picture processing programs and
> >> >> lots of diagnostic stuff (e.g. the TRK), plus the paging file.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Each to his own. My system partition is 100GB, and 56GB of it is used
> >> > (no user data there). That's running Windows Vista Ultimate, but even
> >> > for those running XP, one never knows what operating system one may
> >> > upgrade to in the future.
> >> >
> >> > In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> >> > partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> >> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
> >>
> >> 56 GBytes is huge. It would be interesting to see the space
> >> profile on your system partition. Here is mine. The first number
> >> represents "bytes", the second "files".
> >> 0 0 C:\My Download Files
> >> 85 2 C:\Recycled
> >> 69,362 48 C:\RECYCLER
> >> 377,040 1 C:\Config.Msi
> >> 38,482,686 329 C:\MYOB105
> >> 175,243,430 1,822 C:\Documents and Settings
> >> 232,892,982 98 C:\MSOCache
> >> 778,841,422 10 C:\
> >> 1,538,539,221 13,564 C:\Program Files
> >> 1,663,555,395 2,991 C:\System Volume Information
> >> 3,553,344,512 18,644 C:\WINDOWS
> >> 7,981,346,135 37,509 (Total)
> >
> >
> > Without going into great detail, the great majority of it is in two
> > folders: \Windows and \Users
> >
> > Ken
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
>

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[Ken Blake, MVP]

On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:13:29 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:

> On Dec 30, 3:04 pm, "Ken Blake, MVP"
> <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:
> > In my view, it makes no sense to restrict oneself to a small system
> > partition when you have a drive anywhere near as big as 1TB.
>
>
> Well, I don't look at it as restricting myself, I look at it as making
> it much faster to do backups and restores.


??? Why do you think a backup or restore will be faster if the system
partition is smaller? Are you imaging the entire drive or just backing
up data?

Either way, the partition size shouldn't matter.



> I do have 25 GB reserved
> for the C drive in case I ever need it, with currently 10GB allocated
> to C, and 15 unused. The Acronis software makes it a snap to
> reallocate the used/unused if I run out of room, but in the last five
> years I haven't needed more than 10GB.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
Please Reply to the Newsgroup

 

[a2mgoog@yahoo.com]

On Dec 30, 4:43 pm, "Ken Blake, MVP"
<kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote:

> ??? Why do you think a backup or restore will be faster if the system
> partition is smaller? Are you imaging the entire drive or just backing
> up data?

I am imaging the system partition. I must be missing your point,
because it seems obvious to me that a smaller partition would take
less time to back up.

 

[Lil' Dave]

"Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message
news:5q2gn356073hsqdot05maj1p5545aqq7e8@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:28:27 -0800 (PST), a2mgoog@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> If I have a 1 TB drive, and partition it so that my C: partition is
>> only 10GB or so for easy backup, then by default Windows XP will
>> reserve about 120GB on my non-system partitions for system restore
>> points in the System Volume Information folders, which as far as I
>> have read are never used for anything. That's a lot of space. Is
>> there any reason to leave System Restore turned on for non-boot
>> partitions?
>
>
>
> No. You *should* turn it off on all non-system partitions.
>
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Just curious. Is your definition of an XP system partition any different
that MS's? Same question for an XP boot partition?
Dave