Jump to content
Logging In to Free PC Help Forum Has Changed

syed Maz

Members

  • Last visited

  • Posts

    3

  • Reputation

    0
View Profile Find content
  1. syed Maz

    SBS vs server 2008 - Which do we need. newbie

    syed Maz replied to Lucas's post in a topic in Tech Help and Discussions
    Considering you won't need Exchange in next couple of years due to predicted no-chance of more-employees, I would rule out need of SBS, In my opinon Windows Server 2008 standard would be perfect for you. Besides I think Google Apps (Calander, PoP Mail Stuff) you are using is good to carry on with.
  2. syed Maz

    Network resources become unaccessable after random time intervals

    syed Maz replied to Mysterchr's post in a topic in Tech Help and Discussions
    WoW, thats kind of shocking resolution :)
  3. syed Maz

    Too Many UDP serving Ports 2008 server in SBS2011

    syed Maz posted a post in a topic in Microsoft Support & Discussions
    Server 2008 R2, DNS.exe taking around 5000 system socket ports, it that normal? UDP ports listening from 59632 to 64662 around 5000 ports ???? UDP [::]:64574 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64575 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64576 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64577 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64578 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64579 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64580 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64581 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64582 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64583 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64584 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64585 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64586 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64587 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64588 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64589 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64590 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64591 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64592 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64593 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64594 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64595 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64596 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64597 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64598 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64599 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64600 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64601 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64602 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64603 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64604 *:* 1700 UDP [::]:64624 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64625 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64626 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64627 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64628 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64629 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64630 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64631 *:* 1700 [dns.exe] UDP [::]:64632 *:* 1700 Is it ok or it is not normal procedure, I understand that DNS has to choose a random port which is working fine using "netstat -anb | find/C "dns.exe"" , showing only one socket port. But is that ok to reserve 5000 ports ? Thanks